Literature DB >> 31573455

Implementation of pain best practices as part of the spinal cord injury knowledge mobilization network.

JoAnne Savoie1, Shane McCullum1, Dalton L Wolfe2, Jeremy Slayter1, Colleen O'Connell1.   

Abstract

Context/objective: The spinal cord injury (SCI) knowledge mobilization network (KMN) is a community of practice formed in 2011 as part of a national best practice implementation (BPI) effort to improve SCI care. This study objective was to determine whether completion and documentation of pain practices could be improved in a neurorehabilitation setting using the KMN implementation approach. Design: Single site, pre-post intervention study. Setting: Neurorehabilitation hospital. Participants: Twenty sequential consenting inpatients with SCI, with retrospective comparative analysis of 50 sequential SCI admissions pre-KMN. Interventions: A local Site Implementation Team (SIT) was formed to develop an implementation plan, including acceptable timeframes for completion and documentation of four specific pain best practices: (1) pain assessment on admission, (2) development of an Inter-Professional Pain Treatment Plan (IPTP), (3) pain monitoring throughout admission, and (4) a pain discharge plan. Outcomes: Provider adherences to pain best practices were the primary outcomes. The secondary outcome was patient satisfaction.
Results: Provider adherence for most outcomes exceeded 70% completion within acceptable timeframes, with improvements found for all outcomes as compared to the retrospective cohort. Notably, pain education as part of the IPTP improved from 12% completion to 74%, documenting pain onset from 4.5% to 80% and pain discharge plan from 40% to 74%. Overall, participants were satisfied with their pain management. Conclusions: Pain best practices were more consistently documented after the KMN implementation. Pain practices in all four areas have now been expanded to all inpatient diagnoses using the same forms and framework created in the implementation process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Implementation; Pain management; Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injury

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31573455      PMCID: PMC6781186          DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1654191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med        ISSN: 1079-0268            Impact factor:   1.985


  20 in total

1.  A new definition of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Troels S Jensen; Ralf Baron; Maija Haanpää; Eija Kalso; John D Loeser; Andrew S C Rice; Rolf-Detlef Treede
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 2.  Pain following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  P J Siddall; J D Loeser
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Implementation of clinical practice guidelines for prevention of thromboembolism in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Stephen P Burns; Audrey L Nelson; Helen T Bosshart; Lance L Goetz; Jeffrey J Harrow; Kevin D Gerhart; Harriet Bowers; Barbara Krasnicka; Marylou Guihan
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Lessons learned in implementing SCI clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Maylou Guihan; Helen T Bosshart; Audrey Nelson
Journal:  SCI Nurs       Date:  2004

5.  Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.

Authors:  Laura J Damschroder; David C Aron; Rosalind E Keith; Susan R Kirsh; Jeffery A Alexander; Julie C Lowery
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 6.  Multidisciplinary treatment for chronic pain: a systematic review of interventions and outcomes.

Authors:  L Scascighini; V Toma; S Dober-Spielmann; H Sprott
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 7.  The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research.

Authors:  Zoë Slote Morris; Steven Wooding; Jonathan Grant
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks.

Authors:  Per Nilsen
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 9.  Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review.

Authors:  Anneke L Francke; Marieke C Smit; Anke J E de Veer; Patriek Mistiaen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Hospital-based interventions: a systematic review of staff-reported barriers and facilitators to implementation processes.

Authors:  Liesbeth Geerligs; Nicole M Rankin; Heather L Shepherd; Phyllis Butow
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 7.327

View more
  1 in total

1.  Improving practice through collaboration: Early experiences from the multi-site Spinal Cord Injury Implementation and Evaluation Quality Care Consortium.

Authors:  Emma A Bateman; Vidya A Sreenivasan; Farnoosh Farahani; Sheila Casemore; Andrea D Chase; Jennifer Duley; Ivie K Evbuomwan; Heather M Flett; Anellina Ventre; B Catharine Craven; Dalton L Wolfe
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 1.985

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.