| Literature DB >> 31572248 |
Chao Zhou1, Xiaowei Tang1,2, Wei You3, Xiang Wang4, Xiaobin Zhang2, Xiangrong Zhang1, Miao Yu5.
Abstract
Objective: A limited number of studies have previously reported on the regional activity [amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF)] and functional integration [functional connectivity (FC)] of the whole brain in deficit schizophrenia (DS). The present study investigates the resting-state characteristics of the fractional ALFF (fALFF) and the FC in both DS and non-deficit schizophrenia (NDS) patients, and further explores their correlations with neurocognitive features.Entities:
Keywords: deficit schizophrenia; fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation; neurocognition; resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging; salience network
Year: 2019 PMID: 31572248 PMCID: PMC6754073 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00680
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 4.157
Altered regions of zfALFF among DS, NDS, and HCs.
| Regions | Hemisphere | Peak MNI coordinates |
| Cluster size | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | ||||
|
| ||||||
| Cuneus/middle occipital gyrus/middle frontal gyrus/lingual gyrus/middle temporal gyrus/insula | Bilateral | 45 | −69 | 0 | 23.827 | 9,150 |
| Insula/superior temporal gyrus/middle temporal gyrus/inferior frontal gyrus | Left | −51 | −12 | 12 | 11.382 | 404 |
|
| ||||||
| Cuneus/middle occipital gyrus/lingual gyrus/middle temporal gyrus | Bilateral | 12 | −81 | 9 | −6.775 | 2,830 |
| Pre/postcentral gyrus/middle frontal gyrus/inferior parietal lobule/medial frontal lobe | Bilateral | 12 | −27 | 72 | −5.642 | 1,417 |
| Precuneus/middle cingulate gyrus | Bilateral | 0 | −51 | 42 | 4.831 | 500 |
|
| ||||||
| Cuneus/middle occipital gyrus/inferior occipital gyrus/lingual gyrus/calcarine gyrus/middle temporal gyrus | Bilateral | −24 | −96 | −3 | −6.375 | 3,592 |
| Pre/postcentral gyrus/middle frontal gyrus/superior frontal gyrus/inferior parietal lobule | Left | −27 | 3 | 51 | −5.445 | 762 |
| Pre/postcentral gyrus/superior frontal gyrus/middle frontal gyrus | Right | 27 | −9 | 63 | −5.892 | 812 |
| Thalamus/caudate nucleus/hippocampus/parahippocampal gyrus | Left | −3 | 15 | 6 | 4.693 | 701 |
| Precuneus/middle cingulate gyrus | Bilateral | 0 | −57 | 45 | 5.153 | 627 |
|
| ||||||
| Fusiform gyrus/inferior temporal gyrus | Right | 42 | −51 | −18 | 4.024 | 239 |
| Inferior occipital gyrus/middle occipital gyrus/fusiform gyrus/inferior temporal gyrus | Left | −54 | −57 | −18 | 3.968 | 210 |
| Insula/inferior frontal gyrus/superior temporal gyrus | Left | −36 | 18 | −9 | −4.455 | 175 |
| Insula/superior temporal gyrus | Right | 36 | 12 | 3 | −4.463 | 154 |
| Anterior cingulate gyrus/ventromedial prefrontal cortex | Bilateral | −6 | −6 | 36 | −4.490 | 276 |
zfALFF, fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation value of each voxel normalized to the Z value; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; ANCOVA, analysis of covariance.
Altered regions of FC based on the ROI analysis between DS and NDS.
| ROI Seed Points | Regions | Hemisphere | Peak MNI coordinates |
| Cluster size | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | |||||
| Right FG/ITG | Superior frontal gyrus/middle frontal gyrus/inferior frontal gyrus/ventromedial frontal cortex | Left | −39 | 45 | 0 | 4.881 | 1,676 |
| Left IOG/MOG/FG/ITG | None | ||||||
| Left insula/IFG/STG | Cuneus/lingual gyrus/calcarine gyrus/superior occipital gyrus | Bilateral | 21 | −72 | −3 | 3.991 | 1,905 |
| Right insula/STG | Cuneus/calcarine gyrus/middle occipital gyrus/middle temporal gyrus | Bilateral | −6 | −81 | 30 | 3.927 | 1,015 |
| ACG/VMPFC | Calcarine gyrus/lingual gyrus/fusiform gyrus/left inferior temporal gyrus | Bilateral | −15 | −78 | −3 | 4.347 | 1,860 |
MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; FG, fusiform gyrus; ITG, inferior temporal gyrus; IOG, inferior occipital gyrus; MOG, middle occipital gyrus; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; STG, superior temporal gyrus; ROI, region of interest; ACG, anterior cingulate gyrus; VMPFC, ventromedial prefrontal cortex.
Demographic and cognitive data of DS, NDS, and HC groups.
| Variable | DS | NDS | HC |
| P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 48.70 ± 7.68 | 46.02 ± 5.35 | 45.95 ± 9.47 | 1.464 | 0.236 |
| Education (years) | 8.82 ± 2.02* | 9.20 ± 1.83* | 10.60 ± 2.73 | 6.685 | 0.002 |
| Age at onset (years) | 22.09 ± 3.00 | 22.51 ± 2.62 | −0.644 | 0.521 | |
| Duration of illness (years) | 26.61 ± 7.06 | 23.51 ± 5.81 | 2.068 | 0.042# | |
| Smoker/non-smoker | 20/13 | 30/11 | 1.317 | 0.251a | |
| CPZ-equivalent daily dose (mg/day) | 503.18 ± 224.38 | 537.07 ± 209.66 | −0.670 | 0.505 | |
|
| −10.51 ± 6.47 | −4.04 ± 3.27 | 1.262b | ||
| Digit Vigilance Test (s) | 292.23 ± 128.61*,# | 181.74 ± 64.84 | 137.89 ± 42.86 | 25.001 | <.001 |
| TMT-A (s) | 134.21 ± 68.57*,# | 81.02 ± 30.80* | 49.92 ± 23.40 | 27.238 | <.001 |
| Stroop words only | 44.39 ± 19.99*,# | 58.88 ± 15.14* | 79.93 ± 16.3l | 31.728 | <.001 |
| Stroop colors only | 26.52 ± 12.85*,# | 36.05 ± 11.27* | 49.87 ± 13.14 | 24.428 | <.001 |
|
| −3.53 ± 1.79 | −2.16 ± 2.12 | 0.698b | ||
| Animal Naming Test | 9.27 ± 3.22*,# | 12.07 ± 4.50* | 18.10 ± 4.72 | 33.546 | <.001 |
| COWAT | 4.91 ± 3.11*,# | 6.66 ± 3.51* | 9.23 ± 2.33 | 14.300 | <.001 |
|
| −4.17 ± 2.55 | −2.04 ± 1.36 | 1.042b | ||
| TMT-B (s) | 302.45 ± 120.19*,# | 197.90 ± 53.33* | 122.64 ± 66.13 | 34.786 | <.001 |
| Stroop interference | 16.73 ± 10.69* | 21.46 ± 8.56* | 32.90 ± 10.47 | 20.329 | <.001 |
|
| −3.70 ± 2.00 | −2.15 ± 1.39 | 0.900b | ||
| WAIS-RC (block design) | 13.42 ± 8.92* | 21.41 ± 6.45* | 27.83 ± 8.31 | 22.925 | <.001 |
| Spatial processing (block design) | 11.36 ± 4.47*,# | 13.29 ± 3.30* | 18.25 ± 3.40 | 25.241 | <.001 |
Data presented as the mean ± SD. DS, deficit schizophrenia; NDS, non-deficit schizophrenia; HC, healthy control; TMT-A, Trail Making Test-A; TMT-B, Trail Making Test-B; COWAT, Controlled Oral Word Association Test; WAIS-RC, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Chinese Revision; ES, effect size; CPZ, chlorpromazine. The least-significant difference (LSD) was used for post hoc comparisons. The patients’ composite scores of the four neuropsychological domains were standardized using the HC group data. aThe P value was obtained by using a chi-squared test. bEffect size (Cohen’s d). *indicates the comparison between patients and HC. *p < 0.05. #indicates the comparison between patients. #p < 0.05.
Figure 1(A) Group comparisons of the fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation value of each voxel normalized to the Z value (zfALFF) between deficit schizophrenia (DS), non-deficit schizophrenia (NDS), and healthy control (HC) patient groups. Red represents significantly different regions (voxel level p < 0.05, cluster size ≥ 232, corrected p < 0.05). (B, C) Group analyses of the fALFF between patients and HC groups (voxel level p < 0.05, cluster size ≥ 426/521, corrected p < 0.05). Red and blue respectively represent regions where patients had higher and lower activity compared to HC. (D) Group analyses of the zfALFF between DS and NDS groups (voxel level p < 0.05, cluster size ≥ 146, corrected p < 0.05). Red and blue respectively represent regions where DS showed higher and lower activity compared to NDS.
Figure 2(A) Group analyses of the zfALFF between DS and NDS groups. (B–E) Functional connectivity analysis based on five seed points between DS and NDS groups. (There was no significantly different region contained in one seed point FC map.) Red represents regions where DS had higher FC compared to NDS. FC, functional connectivity; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; STG, superior temporal gyrus; ACG, anterior cingulate gyrus; VMPFC, ventromedial prefrontal cortex; FG, fusiform gyrus; ITG, inferior temporal gyrus. The statistical threshold was set with a combination of voxel level p < 0.05 and cluster size ≥ 465/465/449/464 voxels for four ROI FC analyses (DS vs. NDS), which corresponds to a corrected p < 0.05. (F, G) Correlations between the FC of altered regions and neurocognitive assessments in both DS and NDS patients. VC, visual cortex. The significance threshold was set at p < 0.05.