Literature DB >> 31571951

Computational analysis of naturally occurring resistance-associated substitutions in genes NS3, NS5A, and NS5B among 86 subtypes of hepatitis C virus worldwide.

Ruihong Wu1, Dongfeng Geng2, Xiumei Chi1, Xiaomei Wang1, Xiuzhu Gao1, Hongqin Xu1, Ying Shi1, Yazhe Guan1, Yang Wang1, Jinglan Jin1, Yanhua Ding3, Junqi Niu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Direct-acting antivirals (DAA) facing resistance continue to be used in some areas worldwide. Thus, identifying hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes/subtypes and loci with certain prevalent resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) deserves attention. We investigated the global and regional frequencies of naturally occurring RASs among all confirmed HCV subtypes (n=86) and explored co-occurring and mutually exclusive RAS pairs within and between genes NS3, NS5A, and NS5B.
METHODS: A total of 213,908 HCV sequences available as of July 10, 2019 were retrieved from the NCBI nucleotide database. After curation, 17,312 NS3, 8,478 NS5A, and 25,991 NS5B sequence fragments from DAA-naïve patients were screened for RASs. MEGA 6.0 was used to translate aligned nucleotide sequences into amino acid sequences, and RAS pairs were identified by hypergeometric analysis.
RESULTS: RAS prevalence varied significantly among HCV subtypes. For example, D168E, highly resistanct to all protease inhibitors except voxilaprevir, was nearly absent in all subtypes except in 43.48% of GT5a sequences. RASs in NS3 exhibiting significantly different global distribution included Q80K in GT1a with the highest frequency in North America (54.49%), followed by in Europe (22.66%), Asia (6.98%), Oceania (6.62%), and South America (1.03%). The prevalence of NS3 S122G in GT1b was highest in Asia (26.6%) and lowest in Europe (2.64%). NS5A L28M, R30Q, and Y93H in GT1b, L31M in GT2b, and NS5B C316N in GT1b was most prevalent in Asia. A150V in GT3a, associated with sofosbuvir treatment failure, was most prevalent in Asia (44.09%), followed by Europe (31.19%), Oceania (24.29%), and North America (19.05%). Multiple mutually exclusive or co-occurring RAS pairs were identified, including Q80K+R155K and R155K+D168G in GT1a and L159F+C316N and R30Q (NS5A)+C316N (NS5B) in GT1b.
CONCLUSION: Our data may be of special relevance for those countries where highly effective antivirals might not be available. Considering the specific RASs prevalence will help the clinicians to make optimal treatment choices. The RASs pairs would benefit anti-HCV drug development.
© 2019 Wu et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  direct-acting antiviral; hepatitis C virus; resistance-associated substitution; subtype

Year:  2019        PMID: 31571951      PMCID: PMC6756830          DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S218584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Drug Resist        ISSN: 1178-6973            Impact factor:   4.003


Introduction

Infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a global public health problem. Between 130 and 170 million people are HCV chronically infected1 and up to 4 million individuals are newly infected with HCV annually.2 Persistent HCV infection induces high risk for developing severe liver diseases, such as liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.2,3 HCV is an enveloped positive-sense single-stranded RNA virus whose replication can be robust; model-based calculations indicate production of 1012 virions/day.4,5 This high-level replication and a lack of viral RNA polymerase proofreading contribute to HCV’s genetic divergence. The virus is currently classified into seven major genotypes and 86 subtypes according to the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (June 2017) (https://talk.ictvonline.org/ictv_wikis/flaviviridae/w/sg_flavi/56/hcv-classification) with ~30% divergence at the genotype level and ~15% divergence at the subtype level.6 HCV clearance, which is associated with reduced rates of de novo hepatocellular carcinoma,7 is strongly dependent on HCV genotype/subtype when induced by interferon-based antiviral therapy with sustained virologic response (SVR) rates of approximately 50–80%.8–10 HCV therapy has been revolutionized with the advent of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) that directly target HCV gene products, including NS3 protease inhibitors, NS5A inhibitors, nucleos(t)ide inhibitors (NI), and non-nucleoside inhibitors (NNI) of the NS5B RNA-dependent RNA polymerase.11 Generally, DAA based regimens yield highly promising SVR rates (>90%). However, virologic failure still occurs and has been associated with the emergence of HCV variants with resistance-associated substitutions (RASs), which impair drug susceptibility. Notably, RASs can occur naturally in a genotype/subtype-dependent manner before DAA-induced selective pressure occurs.12–17 For example, the SVR rate of daclatasvir/asunaprevir was severely attenuated due to baseline RASs (65.4% with RASs vs 94.3% without RASs).18 Moreover, due to the negative effects of RAS Q80K on the efficacy of simeprevir, clinical guidelines recommend pre-treatment screening in patients infected with HCV subtype GT1a.19,20 Thus, assessing the prevalence of naturally occurring RASs in different HCV genotypes/subtypes and determining their global geographic distribution will help optimize the selection of therapeutic regimens. Several studies have assessed the prevalence of naturally occurring RASs in HCV genes NS3, NS5A, and/or NS5B from DAA-naïve patients but have focused on particular subtypes21–25 or have used HCV sequence databases26–28 containing a relatively small number of sequences covering very few subtypes. Welzel et al29 performed the largest study to date including 46 subtypes across 5 geographic regions, but the RAS distributions determined in that study were based on clinical trials from regional medical centers in primarily developed countries and thus may not reflect the global HCV RAS landscape. To address this knowledge gap, the aims of our current study were to (1) investigate the global and regional prevalence of HCV RASs among all confirmed HCV subtypes (n=86) by mining HCV sequences in NCBI nucleotide database and Los Alamos HCV database, (2) explore the RASs pairs showing significant more or less co-occurrence.

Materials and methods

HCV datasets

HCV genomic sequences available as of July 10, 2019 were retrieved from the NCBI nucleotide database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide) in GenBank (full) format using the following searching criteria: the title contained the words “hepatitis C virus” and the organism was “hepatitis C virus”. The following information was extracted for each sequence: accession number, times of sampling and publication, HCV genotype/subtype, geographic region, and treatment. If the above-mentioned parameters were not available, we extracted the information from publications linked with the sequences. A total of 213,908 HCV genomic sequences were ultimately retrieved. Only one sequence from any duplicate sets and the sequence obtained from the last visit for patients with multiple visits was retained for further analysis. Sequence exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) no NS3, NS5A, or NS5B fragments present; (2) low quality; (3) from non-human hosts; (4) different clone sequences from the same patient; (5) sequences that encoded non-functional proteins; (6) sequences without any available subtype information or with mixed-genotypes; (7) groups of sequences with ambiguous DAA treatment information (eg, “some DAA-treated patients”) that did not specify which patients/sequences were DAA-treated; and (8) sequences from DAA-treated patients. Sequences were confirmed to be from DAA-treated patients based on the NCBI database description and/or the linked publications. Finally, 17,312 NS3, 8,478 NS5A, and 25,991 NS5B sequences were retained for further analysis. All nucleotide sequences were aligned using the Los Alamos HCV Database (LANL; http://hcv.lanl.gov/components/sequence/HCV/search/searchi.html), which also provided curated HCV subtype and geographic region information for some sequences. All sequences were aligned against the H77 reference sequence (GenBank accession no. NC_004102). The aligned nucleotide sequences in FASTA format were downloaded and then translated into their corresponding amino acid sequences with MEGA 6.0 software (Center for Evolutionary Medicine and Informatics, Tempe, AZ, USA) and manually checked and edited as necessary. The MEGA 6.0 output table was further analyzed with R (version 2.10.0) to calculate allele frequencies for each RAS. We focused only on the defined genomic regions relevant to drug resistance, including the first 630 amino acids in NS3, the first 100 amino acids in NS5A, and all 591 amino acids in NS5B.

RASs

RASs were defined by a combination of substitutions summarized in three review papers,30–32 and others recently reported associated with DAA treatment failure and/or conferred a ≥2-fold change in susceptibility compared with a reference strain via in vitro replicon assays.33–39 NS3 RASs included V36A/G/L/M, Q41K/R, F43C/I/L/S/V, T54A/S, V55A/I, Y56F/H/N, Q80G/H/K/L/R, S122D/G/N/R/T, S138T, R155C/G/I/K/L/N/Q/S/T/W, A156G/H/K/L/M/S/T/V, V158A, A166T, D168/A/C/E/F/G/H/I/K/L/N/Q/R/S/T/V/Y, I170T/V, and L175M. NS5A RASs included K24/A/E/G/N/Q/R, S24F/H/T, Q24K/T, T24A/S, K26E, M28A/G/I/K/S/T/V, L28A/F/I/M/S/T/V, F28C/M/S/V,Q30D/E/G/H/I/K/L/N/R/S/T/Y, R30C/E/G/H/K/N/Q/S/T, A30G/H/K/V, L30A/F/G/H/Q/R/S, L31F/I/M/P/V/W, M31F/I/L/V, P32A/L/Q/R/S, S38F, Q54H, H58D/L/N, P58A/D/G/L/R/S/T, T58A/D/G/H/L/N/S, E62D/L, A92K/P/T, C92A/K/N/R/S/T, E92K, Y93C/F/H/I/L/N/R/S/T/W, and T93A/H/I/N/S. NS5B RASs included A150V, L159F, G188D, K206E, E237G, N244I, S282G/R/T, M289I/L, L314H, C316F/H/N/Y, L320F, V321A/I, S368T, A395G, N411S, M414I/T/V, N444K, C445F, E446K/Q, Y448C/H, C451S, A553T/V, G554S, S556G/N/R, G558R, D559G/N, Y561H, and S565F.

Statistical analysis

Differences in RAS prevalence among geographic regions were determined using Fisher’s exact test. Probabilities (P-values) of observing a pair of RASs together in no fewer or no greater than n sequences by random chance were calculated using the hypergeometric test. Statistical analyses were performed using R (version 2.10.0). A P value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Prevalence of naturally occurring NS3 RASs in 86 HCV subtypes

The prevalence of naturally occurring NS3 RASs in different HCV subtypes is shown in Table 1. Majority of NS3 RASs were absent or have very low frequencies (<0.5%), and only several RASs including Q80K, S122G/T/N and D168E were observed in a high rate of sequences in a subtype dependent manner (). The RAS Q80K confers low-level resistance to simeprevir in vitro and is associated with a reduced treatment response in vivo. We found Q80K-positive sequences in 31.74% of HCV subtype GT1a sequences (2277/7178) but only 1.14% of sequences in subtype GT1b (81/7176). This RAS was found frequently in subtypes GT1d (86.67%, 13/15), 5a (100%, 46/46), and 6a (98.28%, 402/409) but was very rare in subtype 3a (0.24%, 2/820). The RAS was also observed in 16.67% (1/6) of subtype 1i sequences. All GT4 and other GT1, 3, 5, 6, 7 subtypes harbored no Q80K-positive sequences. Q80R, which confers resistance to simeprevir/asunaprevir/faldaprevir, was rarely present in G1a (0.49%, 35/7178), G1b (0.3%, 21/7176), 3i (16.67%, 1/6), 4d (1.45%, 1/69), and 6a (0.24%, 1/409). Similarly, R155K, which carries variants associated with resistance to protease inhibitors such as simeprevir, asunaprevir, paritepravir, vaniprevir, and faldaprevir, was rarely present in 0.96% (69/7164) of GT1a, 16.67% (1/6) 1h, and 0.25% (2/805) 3a sequences. A156L/T/V, the only RASs conferred high resistance (>100-fold) to voxilaprevir (a potent pan-genotypic second generation of protease inhibitor), were not detected except in 1a, and 1b with frequencies <0.05%. The RASs at position D168, highly resistant to all protease inhibitors except voxilaprevir, were rare (approximately 1%) in nearly all HCV subtypes, whereas D168E occurred in 43.48% (20/46) of GT5a sequences. RASs at position 122, which confer resistance to simeprevir, asunaprevir and/or voxilaprevir in GT1a and/or GT1b, was highly prevalent in GT5a (122T, 73.9%), GT6a (122N, 76.3%) and GT1b (122G, 9.34%). S122R (confers resistance to simeprevir and asunaprevir) was exclusively detected in GT2 and with GT2 subtype-specific frequencies (i.e., 100% in 2b, 2c, 2d, 2e, 2f, 2i, 2j, 2l, 2m, 2q and 2t but only 1.89% (1/53) in 2a and 0% in 2r and 2u). These present of these RASs may limit the use of some inhibitors for treating the corresponding subtypes. V36L, associated with resistance to asunaprevir, paritepravir, and faldaprevir, was uncommon in GT1a (1.50%) and 1b (0.96%) but more frequent (13.33% to 100%) in five GT1 subtypes including 1d, 1e, 1g, 1i, and 1l. This RAS was also found in almost all GT2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 sequences, as well in several GT6 subtypes. Another asunaprevir/paritepravir/faldaprevir RAS, V36M, was only observed in GT1a (0.48%) and 1b (0.03%). T54S was infrequent in GT1a (3.02%) and 1b (2.01%). The frequency of V170A was extremely low (<0.1%) in GT1a or GT1b but significantly varied among other subtypes with respect to frequency. Lastly, three RASs (Q41R, F43L/S, Y56H) were only found in GT1a or GT1b and at an extremely low prevalence. (<0.1%)
Table 1

Prevalence of naturally occurring NS3 RASs in 86 HCV subtypes

Sub-typeNo. of seqaV36AGLMQ41KRF43CILSVT54ASV55AIY56FHNQ80GHKLR
1a7071, 71801.50L, 0.48M, 0.01A/G0.01R0.01L, 0.01S3.02S, 0.01A2.25A,1.82I0.67F,0.06H31.74K,1.14L,0.49R,0.01G,0.01H
1b6849, 71330.96L, 0.03M, 0.01A0.04R,0.03K0.04L2.01S0.44A,021I26F3.68L,1.14K,0.30R,0.03H,0.01G
1c5.......
1d1513.33L..66.7S.6.67F86.67K
1e15100L..100S6.67I..
1g520L..80S...
1h6.......
1i616.67L....16.7F16.67K
1j1.......
1k1.......
1l922.22L....11.1F77.8L
1m2.......
1n2.....50F50L
2a5398.11L....3.77F98.1G,1.89Q
2b111100L....3.6F100G
2c9, 46100L....100F100G
2d1100L....100F100G
2e1100L..100A.100F100G
2f2100L....100F100G
2i4100L....100F100G
2j683.3L,16.7M....100F100G
2k475L....75F75G
2l4100L.....100G
2m4100L....100F100G
2q2100L....100F100G
2r1100L....100F100G
2t1100L....100F100G
2u1100L.....100G
3a780, 82099.6L..0.24S0.24I0.24F0.24K
3b138100L..1.45S...
3d1100L......
3e1100L......
3g2100L......
3h2100L......
3i6100L.....16.67R
3k2100L......
4a83, 9297.8L..6.52S...
4b2100L......
4c1, 2100L......
4d49, 69100L.....1.45R
4f11100L......
4g3100L......
4k4100L......
4l3100L......
4m4, 5100L......
4n3, 4100L......
4o4100L......
4p1100L......
4q1100L......
4r6100L......
4s1100L......
4t1100L......
4v4100L......
4w2100L......
5a46100L....100F100K
6a409.....0.73F98.28K,0.24L,0.24R
6b2.......
6c2.......
6d1,250L......
6e10.......
6f22100L......
6g2100L......
6h5.......
6i3.......
6j3.......
6k812.5L......
6l8, 911.11L......
6m4.......
6n25.......
6o3.......
6p2.......
6q3.......
6r3.....66.7F.
6s3100L....100F.
6t4100L....50F.
6u3.......
6v6.......
6w3100L......
6xa3.....100F.
6xb2.......
6xc1.......
6xd3100L.....33.3L
6xe2.......
6xf250L......
7a2100L......
7b1100L..100S...
Prevalence of naturally occurring NS3 RASs in 86 HCV subtypes (Continued). Notes: Data are presented as %. The dot denotes 0%. aNot all the positions were analyzed using the same number of sequences. The first figure is the lowest number, and the second figure is the largest number. n.a.: not applicable because of different natural amino acid sequences in the respective HCV genotype/subtype (NS3 V170 and M175 are the dominant amino acids in GT1b).

Prevalence of naturally occurring NS5A RASs in 86 HCV subtypes

The prevalence of naturally occurring NS5A RASs in different HCV subtypes is shown in Table 2. Similar to NS3, most RASs were absent or have very low frequencies (<0.5%) (). RAS Y93H was associated with reduced NS5A-targeted DAA efficacy, with or without L31M/V/I, in GT1b-infected patients.40 Y93H appeared in sequences of subtypes GT1a (0.41%, 12/2928), 1b (4.25%, 80/1882), 1c (25%,1/4), 1m (50%, 1/2), 3a (1.35%, 14/1114), 4a (3.33%,1/30), 4b (50%,1/2), 4g (33.33%,1/3), 7a (100%,2/2) and 7b (100%,1/1). Other substitutions at this position, such as Y93C/F/N/S, were uncommon in GT1a, 1b, 2a, 3a, and 6a (0.03%-1.92%), but were prevalent in other subtypes, including GT1c, 1g, 1m, 4w, 6e, 6m, 6n, 6o, 6u, 6v, and 6xe (15.38%-100%). L31M, which confers resistance to daclatasvir/omibitasvir/ledipasvir, has been associated with reduced elbasvir/grazoprevir efficacy in patients with HCV-GT1a infection.17 L31M was rare in GT1a (0.65%,19/2928) and 1b (2.63%,49/1865) sequences and absent in GT3a, 5a, and all GT6 subtypes except in one GT6a sequence. In contrast, this RAS was frequently detected (≥50%) in subtypes G1d, 1e, 1l, 1m, 3b, and a majority of GT2 and 4 subtypes. A30K, which is associated with daclatasvir resistance, was only detected in 2.25% of GT3a sequences but was found in nearly 100% of sequences from other GT3 subtypes. The most commonly observed RAS in GT1b was Q54H (26.76%, daclatasvir resistance). RASs L28M (daclatasvir/ombitasvir resistance) and R30Q (daclatasvir resistance) were identified in 2.37% and 4.66% of GT1b sequences, respectively.
Table 2

Prevalence of naturally occurring NS5A RASs in 86 HCV subtypes

SubtypeNo.of seqaK24AEGNQRbM28AGIKSTVF28CSL28AFIMSTVQ30DEGHIKLNRSTYR30CEGHKNQSTA30GHKV
1a2855, 29280.46R,0.21E,0.32Q3.79V, 0.38T,0.10In.a.n.a.1.30L, 0.79H, 0.44Rn.a.n.a.
1b1817, 18821.93Kn.a.n.a.0.11F,2.37M,0.11Vn.a.4.66Q,0.59K,0.05Hn.a.
1c4.50V.50M,50V.100Q.
1d1....100R..
1e250R..100M.100Q.
1g250R...50.00R50.00Q.
1h3100Q...100R..
1i1100Q...100R..
1j1...100M.100Q.
1k1.100A.100A.100Q.
1l366.67G..100M33.33R66.67Q.
1m2...100M50S50S,50Q.
1n2...100M.100Q.
2a52...100F100K100K100K
2b145...4.83F99.3K99.3K99.3K
2c9..33.3C66.67F22.2R,77.8K77.8K77.8K
2d1....100K100K100K
2e1...100F100K100K100K
2f250F50S50S50F,50S100K100K100K
2i4...100F100K100K100K
2j6...66.67F100K100K100K
2k425Q..25.00F25R,75K75K75K
2l2....100K100K100K
2m4....50R,50K50K50K
2q2....100K100K100K
2r1...100F100K100K100K
2t1....100K100K100K
2u1...100F100K100K100K
3a1112, 11141.08A,0.09T0.27V,0.09T.0.09T,99.2M1.26L, 0.90T,0.45S0.90T,0.45S2.25K,0.81V
3b19...100M5.26R,84.2K84.2K84.2K
3d1...100M100K100K100K
3e1...100M100K100K100K
3g250T..100M100K100K100K
3h2...100M...
3i6...100M16.67R,83.3K83.3K83.3K
3k2100G..50M100K100K100K
.........
4a30.6.67V.10M,6.67V86.67L,3.33R,3.33H3.33S3.33H,3.33S3.33H
4b2....50.00S50.00S.
4c1....100R..
4d11....90.91R..
4f6....66.67R33.33Q.
4g3....66.67L,33.33R..
4k3....100R..
4l3....100R..
4m4....100S100S.
4n3....100R..
4o4...100M100T..
4p1....100R..
4q1....100R..
4r7.42.86V,28.6I.28.6I,28.6M,42.7V100R..
4s1....100R..
4t1....100R..
4v4....100R..
4w2...100M100S100S.
.........
5a23100Q....100Q.
6a11689.7Q,6.03R2.59V.23.3F,2.59V100R..
6b2.100T.100T100R..
6c2.100V.100V50T50T.
6d1100R100V.100V100T100T.
6e1315.38R46.15V.53.9M,46.2V100S100S.
6f18.61.11T,38.89A.61.1T,38.9A100S100S.
6g2...100M50.00S50.00S.
6h5.100V.100V...
6i3.66.67V.66.67V...
6j4.100V.100V...
6k825R100V.100V...
6l7.100V.100V...
6m4.100V.100V100S100S.
6n9.100V.100V100S100S.
6o4.......
6p3.66.67V.33.3M,66.7V100S100S.
6q3.100V.100V100S100S.
6r3.33.33G,33.33T.33.33T...
6s333.33R..33.3M100S100S.
6t4.100V.100V100S100S.
6u2.100V.100V100S100S.
6v4.100V.100V100S100S.
6w3.100T.100T...
6xa3.100V.100V100S100S.
6xb2.100V.100V...
6xc1.100V.100V...
6xd3...66.67F100R..
6xe2.100V.100V100S100S.
6xf250R100V.100V..50V
7a2....100S100S.
7b1....100S100S.
Prevalence of naturally occurring NS5A RASs in 86 HCV subtypes (Continued). Notes: Data are presented as %. The dot denotes 0%. aNot all the positions were analyzed using the same number of sequences. The first figure is the lowest number, and the second figure is the largest number. n.a. not applicable because of different natural amino acid sequences in the respective HCV genotype/subtype (NS5A K24, M28, Q30, and H58 are the dominant amino acids in GT1a; F28 is the dominant amino acid in subtype 2a and L28 in subtype 2b; A30 is the dominant amino acid in GT3; T93 is the dominant amino acid in GT6). bFor GT1b, Q24K was screened; for GT3 and GT2 except GT2a, S24FHT were screened. cFor GT1b, P58A/D/G/L/R/S/T was screened; for GT6, T58A/D/G/H/L/N/S were screened. dFor GT2, C92A/K/N/R/S/T was screened; for GT3, E92K were screened.No sequences harbored S38F. K26E was found in 0.11% of 1a, and 0.27% of 3a sequences.

Prevalence of naturally occurring NS5B NI-specific and NNI-specific RASs in 86 HCV subtypes

The prevalence of naturally occurring NI-specific NS5B RASs and NNI-specific RASs in different HCV subtypes is shown in Table 3. Except for a few RASs with high rates, others have very low rates (). A150V has recently been found to be associated with a reduced response to treatment with sofosbuvir and ribavirin, with or without pegylated interferon in GT3a infected patients.34 A150V is highly prevalent in sequences of GT3a (31.5%, 103/327). L159F was found in 11.19% (297/2655) of GT1b sequences but in only 0.09% (2/2346) of GT1a sequences. S282T, the only known variant conferring sofosbuvir resistance in vitro, rarely appeared in GT1a (0.19%, 10/5182), 1b (0.15%, 11/7440), 2b (0.22%, 1/455), 3a (0.03%, 1/3003) and 4a (0.35%, 3/857).
Table 3

Prevalence of naturally occurring NS5B RASs in 86 HCV subtypes

Sub typeNo.of seqaNS5B NI RAS position
A150VL159FK206EE237GS282TGRM289ILL320FV321AI
1a1433, 5412.0.090.121.540.19T,0.02G,0.02R0.10L0.020.23I,0.02A
1b2090, 74620.08V11.20.030.060.15T,0.26R,0.03G0.01I0.031.83I,0.01A
1c3, 27........
1d1, 27........
1e2, 59........
1g2, 41.......2.7I
1h3, 30........
1i1, 6........
1j1, 4........
1k1, 8.......100I
1l3, 40.......2.5I
1m2, 5........
1n2, 2.......100I
2a28, 74213.8....1.49I, 0.54L0.14.
2b97, 4601.03..3.020.22T7.73I.0.44I
2c13, 286.....0.35I.0.78I
2d1, 9........
2e1, 25.....100L..
2f2, 14........
2i4, 84.....1.19I, 2.38L..
2j6, 89..16.74.76.1.12I..
2k9, 72.....1.39I.3.17I
2l2, 20.....5.00I, 90.0L..
2m3, 21........
2q2, 5.....20.00I..
2r1, 13100......46.2I
2t1, 1........
2u1, 1........
3a90, 315531.5.7.380.450.2R,0.03T0.07L0.030.13I
3b20, 6722.63.7.920.670.15G...
3d1, 3..100.....
3e1, 4........
3g2, 8........
3h2, 12.....100L..
3i5, 20..33.3.....
3k2, 57..55.6.....
4a42, 857...10.050.35T,0.12R0.95L0.120.12I
4b2, 14.....7.14L.7.14I
4c1, 59....1.69G..3.77I
4d25, 672...0.950.18R0.18I, 0.18L..
4f5, 87...2.38....
4g3, 16.......6.25I
4k3, 127....1.57G0.79L.7.14I
4l5, 31...9.68.7.69L..
4m4, 29..25.....
4n2, 31...3.23....
4o4, 44.....2.38I..
4p1, 16........
4q1, 15.....26.7L..
4r3, 126...1.15...60.3I
4s1, 3........
4t1, 22........
4v2, 6...66.67.16.7L..
4w2, 2........
5a37, 419.....1.19I0.25.
6a118, 1290....0.08R1.16L..
6b2, 9.....77.8L..
6c2, 12.....100L..
6d1, 13.....100L..
6e16, 139.....98.6L..
6f5, 121.....98.4L.0.87I
6g2, 5........
6h5, 42........
6i4, 38........
6j4, 16.....50.0L..
6k8, 31.....100L..
6l7, 42..14.3..100L..
6m4, 21..87.5.....
6n8, 196..6.45..94.9L.0.54I
6o4, 13.....100L..
6p2, 15.....6.67I, 93.3L..
6q3, 18.....100L.16.7I
6r3, 11.....100L..
6s3, 5...100.100L..
6t4, 4.....100L..
6u2, 43.....4.65L..
6v4, 6........
6w3, 4.....100 L..
6xa3, 4........
6xb2, 2.....100L..
6xc1, 1.....100L..
6xd3, 3.....33.3L..
6xe2, 2..50..100L..
6xf2, 4.....100L..
7a2, 2........
7b1, 2........
Prevalence of naturally occurring NS5B RASs in 86 HCV subtypes (Continued). Notes: Data are presented as %. The dot denotes 0%. C451S were detected in 1.05% of 1b sequences, G188D in 0.82% of 3a, N224I in 3.06% of 3a and in 3.45% of 6k, A395G in 0.75% of 4a, and Y561H in 0.10% of 1b. L314H, N444K, S565F were not found. aNot all the positions were analyzed using the same number of sequences. The first figure is the lowest number, and the second figure is the largest number. All observed NNI-specific RASs are associated with dasabuvir. C316N was common in sequences of GT1b (43.09%, 3179/7377), GT4f (81.61%, 71/87), 4b (14.29%, 2/14), and 1e (10.17%,6/59). C316H was observed in GT1b (1.19%, 88/7377) and 5–10% of several GT4 subtypes but was more prevalent in GT4r (60.32%, 76/126). The frequency of S556G was higher in GT1b than in GT1a (11.77% vs.0.79%) and was found in 6h (85.71%, 6/7), 6e (5.26%, 1/19), and GT2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 subtypes (nearly 100%). However, this RAS was absent in other GT1 subtypes and GT6 subtypes, although S556N, a closely related variant, was harbored by GT4r (75%, 3/4). S556R was found in GT1a (0.34%) and in several GT6 subtypes (6a, 6e, 6n, 6o, 6p, 6q, 6s, 6t, 6u, 6xc, and 6xf).

Geographical distribution of RASs

Country of origin information was available for approximately 70% of the analyzed sequences. We classified these sequences into Asia, Europe, North America, Central America, South America, Former USSR, Oceania, Africa, Caribbean, or Middle East clusters according to geographic region definitions in the Los Alamos HCV Database. The majority of RASs in most HCV subtypes were similarly distributed among different geographic regions worldwide. NS3 RASs with distinctly variable prevalence by geographic region including Q8OK in GT1a, V36L in GT1a, S122G in GT1b and so on (Figure 1, P<0.05). Q80K in GT1a was mostly prevalent in North America (54.49%, 679/1246), followed by Europe (22.66%, 246/1090), Asia (6.98%, 3/43), Oceania (6.62%, 9/136), and South America (1.03%, 4/390). NS5A RASs (L28M, R30Q, Q54H, and Y93H in GT1b, L31M in GT2b, and E62L in GT3a) varied significantly in geographic prevalence (Figure 2, all P-values <0.05). L28M, R30Q, and Y93H in GT1b showed the highest prevalence in Asia. NS5B RASs exhibited distinct global distribution patterns are present in Figure 3. C316N/H was found mostly in Asia (73.20%, 1923/2627), followed by in the Former USSR (63.77%, 213/334), Europe (31.82%, 415/1304), North America (22.81%, 52/228), South America (21.39%, 182/851), Oceania (10.64%, 5/47), the Middle East (21.82%, 24/110), Africa (4.49%, 7/156), Central America (0%, 0/10), and the Caribbean (0%, 0/12). In contrast, Asia had the lowest prevalence of L159F in GT1b (0.62%, 2/322), while S556G in GT1b commonly appeared in Oceania (26.92%, 7/26) but infrequently in North America (4.49%, 8/178). A150V in GT3a was most prevalent in Asia (44.09%), followed by Europe (31.19%), Oceania (24.29%), and North America (19.05%).
Figure 1

The global and regional frequency of naturally occurring NS3 RASs that showed unequal distribution by geographic regions. In each plot, except for the first bar representing the global prevalence, geographic regions were arranged in descending order according to the frequency of RASs. Sequences were clustered into Asia, Europe, North America, Central America, South America, Former USSR, Oceania, Africa, Caribbean or Middle East. In each plot, regions with <10 sequences were not shown. Region definition was according to the Los Alamos HCV Database. “A” in North A, South A and Central A denotes America.

Figure 2

NS5A RASs rate with significantly different frequencies among different geographic regions. In each plot, the first bar represents the global prevalence and geographic regions were arranged in descending order according to the frequency of RASs. Sequences were clustered into Asia, Europe, North America, Central America, South America, Former USSR, Oceania, Africa, Caribbean or Middle East. In each plot, only regions with at least 10 sequences were shown. Region definition was according to the Los Alamos HCV Database. “A” in North A, South A and Central A denotes America.

Figure 3

NS5B RASs rate with significantly different frequencies among different geographic regions. In each plot, the first bar represents the global prevalence and geographic regions were arranged in descending order according to the frequency of RASs. Sequences were clustered into Asia, Europe, North America, Central America, South America, Former USSR, Oceania, Africa, Caribbean or Middle East. In each plot, only regions with at least 10 sequences were shown. Region definition was according to the Los Alamos HCV Database. “A” in North A, South A and Central A denotes America.

The global and regional frequency of naturally occurring NS3 RASs that showed unequal distribution by geographic regions. In each plot, except for the first bar representing the global prevalence, geographic regions were arranged in descending order according to the frequency of RASs. Sequences were clustered into Asia, Europe, North America, Central America, South America, Former USSR, Oceania, Africa, Caribbean or Middle East. In each plot, regions with <10 sequences were not shown. Region definition was according to the Los Alamos HCV Database. “A” in North A, South A and Central A denotes America. NS5A RASs rate with significantly different frequencies among different geographic regions. In each plot, the first bar represents the global prevalence and geographic regions were arranged in descending order according to the frequency of RASs. Sequences were clustered into Asia, Europe, North America, Central America, South America, Former USSR, Oceania, Africa, Caribbean or Middle East. In each plot, only regions with at least 10 sequences were shown. Region definition was according to the Los Alamos HCV Database. “A” in North A, South A and Central A denotes America. NS5B RASs rate with significantly different frequencies among different geographic regions. In each plot, the first bar represents the global prevalence and geographic regions were arranged in descending order according to the frequency of RASs. Sequences were clustered into Asia, Europe, North America, Central America, South America, Former USSR, Oceania, Africa, Caribbean or Middle East. In each plot, only regions with at least 10 sequences were shown. Region definition was according to the Los Alamos HCV Database. “A” in North A, South A and Central A denotes America.

Naturally occurring combined RASs

The associations of RASs within and between the HCV NS3, NS5A, and NS5B genes were investigated using a hypergeometric test to detect significantly more or less frequent RAS co-occurrences. This analysis identified pairs of variants that may result in improved or reduced fitness, and RASs were defined as co-occurring or mutually exclusive based on their observed frequencies. Subtypes GT1a and 1b were separately analyzed. For each pair of RASs, only overlapping sequences were used. Dozens of RAS pairs were identified. In GT1a, RAS combinations within NS3 is shown in Figure 4A. Q80K has three partners (R155K, D168E, and T54S), but the frequencies of all their combinations was significantly lower than expected. Q80K and R155K were respectively observed in 31.87% (2275/7137) and 0.96% (69/7137) of GT1a sequences, but the pair was only found in 0.056% (4/7137) of sequences compared with the expected level (0.308%). Thus, these RASs were considered a mutually exclusive pair. All of these RASs, except Q80K, showed significantly higher co-occurrences with other RASs than expected. For example, R155K tends to be present with V36M, D168G, and T54S. Co-occurring pairs in NS5A included L31M+Y93C and Q30H+Y93H (Figure 4B), and those in NS5B included NI-L159F+NNI-S556G and NNI-M414T+NNI-S556G (Figure 4C). We also identified some co-occurring RASs pairs among NS3, NS5A, and NS5B, including NS3-Q80K+NA5A-M28T/V, NS3-T54S+NS5A-Q30H/L and NS3-V36M+NS5B-A553V and so on (Figure 4D). Two RASs from different regions co-occurred rarely in this study (one or two of the 734 sequences). This means that each of these RASs occurred rarely, but they tend to be co-occurred.
Figure 4

Co-occurring and mutually exclusive RAS pairs within NS3 (A), NS5A (B) and NS5B (C) and among regions (D) in GT1a; within NS3 (E), NS5A (F) and NS5B (G) and among regions (H) in GT-1b. Bold line represents HCV genome, the figures on the line indicate the location of amino acid, the characters above the location indicate the wild type amino acids, and the characters below the location indicate RASs. The solid, and dashed line connecting two RASs indicate co-occurring RAS pairs (significantly more frequent appearance than expected) and mutually exclusive RAS pairs (significantly infrequent occurrence than expected), respectively. Amino acid residue position is numbered relative to the first amino acid of the NS3, NS5A, or NS5B region.

Co-occurring and mutually exclusive RAS pairs within NS3 (A), NS5A (B) and NS5B (C) and among regions (D) in GT1a; within NS3 (E), NS5A (F) and NS5B (G) and among regions (H) in GT-1b. Bold line represents HCV genome, the figures on the line indicate the location of amino acid, the characters above the location indicate the wild type amino acids, and the characters below the location indicate RASs. The solid, and dashed line connecting two RASs indicate co-occurring RAS pairs (significantly more frequent appearance than expected) and mutually exclusive RAS pairs (significantly infrequent occurrence than expected), respectively. Amino acid residue position is numbered relative to the first amino acid of the NS3, NS5A, or NS5B region. For GT1b, co-occurring pairs in NS3, NS5A, and NS5B were shown in Figure 4E, F, and G respectively. NS3 RAS pairs included T54S+Q80L, Y56F+S122T and so on. NS5A pairs included Y93H+Q54H and L28M+R30Q. Within NS5B, similar to GT1a, pairs NI-L159F+NNI-S556G and NNI-M414I/T+NNI-S556G were identified. Other pairs included C316H+V321I. 95.4% of sequences with 316H have 321I. Co-occurring pairs between NS3, NS5A, and NS5B, included NS5A-L28M+NS5B-C316N, NS5A-R30Q+NS5B-C316N, and NS3-V36L+NS5B-S556N (Figure 4H).

Discussion

This study investigated naturally occurring RASs among all 86 confirmed HCV subtypes using nucleotide sequences from multiple public databases. We analyzed the frequency and distribution of RASs based on HCV subtype and global geographic regions. In addition, co-occurring RAS and mutually exclusive RAS pairs were identified in subtypes GT1a and 1b within or between the NS3, NS5A, and NS5B genes. The frequency of Q80K in NS3 varied by both HCV subtype and geographic regions. This RAS was detected in nearly one-third of HCV GT1a sequences and was particularly prevalent in North America, which corroborates findings from previous studies. The NS3 R155K and D168E substitutions, which confer resistance to simeprevir and cross-resistance to other NS3/4A protease inhibitors, appeared in 0.96% and 0.23% of HCV GT1a sequences, respectively. Frequencies of Q80K+R155K and Q80K+D168E were lower than expected, and the pairs appeared to be mutually exclusive. However, these observations contrast with those from another study in which 83% (29/35) of patients infected with HCV GT1a harboring Q80K who experienced virologic failure with simeprevir plus Peg-IFNα/RBV developed virus with a treatment-emergent R155K.41 R155 enables protein conformation favorable for interactions with the quinoline moiety of simeprevir (TMC435), and the salt bridge network between Q80, R155, and D168 within the complex stabilizes this conformation. The R155K mutation results in loss of the salt bridge between residue 155 and Asp168, which leads to reduced simeprevir efficacy.42 Y93H was most prevalent in GT1b (dominant in Asia), and present in 1.35% GT3a and the two 7a and one 7b sequences. Its distribution may be associated with polymorphism of some immune genes. Nguyen et al suggested that the frequency of Y93H in patients who were IFNL3 rs12979860 CC major homozygotes (30%, 3/10) was higher than in the non-CC group in Ireland (11.1%, 4/36),43 and Asian patients also had a high frequency of IFNL3 rs12979860 CC (approximately 90%).44 This association may explain the prevalence of Y93H in Asia. Y93H variants reduce viral sensitivity to ledipasvir in the GT3 HCV subtype.45 The low frequency of Y93H in GT3a is consistent with previous reports, which found only 1 or 2 patients carrying Y93H of among approximately 50 patients at baseline.46–48 The NI-specific RAS S282T, the only RAS to confer in vitro resistance to sofosbuvir, was detected in 27 sequences from GT1a, GT1b, GT2b, GT2h, GT3a, and GT4a. Although this RAS was widely distributed geographically, the most recent notation of this RAS in the searched databases was from 2008. This finding suggests S282T may be deleterious to HCV fitness and could explain why S282T has not been recently identified in samples from clinical trials and has only been found in a few patients with viral relapse in recent years.49–52 The first case involving the S282T variant was reported when viral breakthrough occurred at week 12 in a patient infected with genotype GT3a.49 L159F is not associated with reduced sofosbuvir susceptibility, although this RAS was frequently detected with C316N. The high frequency of this double mutation was reported in untreated Brazilian patients infected with GT1b.53 The combination of L159F with C316N was also frequently found in GT1b-infected patients who failed to respond to sofosbuvir/ribvirin or other sofosbuvir-based regimens.54 Notably, we found a very high prevalence of C316N, but a very low occurrence of L159F, in Asia. As demonstrated in a study of Japanese patients, deep sequencing showed that 30.0% of patients with C316N also carried L159F, indicating that the variant is present but not easily detected due to low abundance.55 S556G significantly co-occurred with C316N in GT1b sequences, which reflects results from a previous study showed this combination after treatment failure with three DAAs (paritaprevir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir) in GT1b-infected patients.56 Two important points need to be addressed. The first one is whether the observed RASs are the result of natural HCV variation or of transmission from patients who selected RASs during DAA treatment is unclear. This information was not available in overwhelming studies. In clinical practice, it is difficult to determine the source of infection. The second one is about sequences with highly similarity. Although we have excluded all the clones from the same individuals and only kept one sequence from DAA naive patients with multiple visits, we cannot rule out the possibility that there may be some sequences originated from the same individual at different time points but are not specified in NCBI or related publications. In conclusion, we obtained the knowledge about the geographic and subtype specific prevalence for an updated list of RASs. Our data may be of special relevance for those countries where highly effective antivirals might not be available. Considering the geographic and subtype specific RASs prevalence will help the clinicians to make optimal treatment choices. The RASs pairs both mutually exclusive and co-occurring would benefit anti-HCV drug development. In addition, given that the emergence of RASs is a growing issue in the setting of current treatment with DAAs, the results provide valuable data on the baseline prevalence, which can be used to monitor for increasing antiviral resistance in the future.
Table 1

(Continued).

Sub-typeS122DGNRTR155CGIKLNQSTWA156GHKLMSTVV158AA166TD168AnyoneI170TVL175M
1a6.43G,0.85N,0.18T,0.01R0.96K, 0.01M, 0.04T, 0.01S0.04T0.01.0.23E, 0.01G,0.01N5.49V,0.11T2.32
1b9.34G,4.46T,3.2N,0.04R.0.01T.0.030.67E, 0.03Q,0.01V66.1V,0.15T96.4
1c80N.....80V.
1d6.67T.....100V100
1e73.3N,20.0T.....93.3V.
1g20N.....100V.
1h16.7T16.67K....100V100
1i......100V100
1j100N.....100V.
1k100T.......
1l22.2T,11.1N.....88.9V.
1m50T.......
1n.......50
2a1.89R.....1.89V1.89
2b100R.....1.80V.
2c100R.......
2d100R.......
2e100R.......
2f100R.......
2i100R..25....
2j100R.......
2k75R.....25V25
2l100R.....100V.
2m100R.......
2q100R.......
2r100T.......
2t100R.......
2u........
3a0.37T0.25K0.12G.5.59T98.9Q,0.50R,0.13H/K4.41V0.13
3b0.73T5.07I, 4.35M...100Q..
3d.....100Q..
3e.....100Q..
3g.....100Q..
3h.....100Q..
3i.....100Q100V.
3k.....100Q..
4a96.7T.....90.6V.
4b50T.....100V.
4c100T.....100V.
4d95.7T...1.75.98V.
4f100T.....100V.
4g100T.....100V.
4k100T.....100V.
4l100T.....100V.
4m......75V.
4n100T.....100V.
4o100T.....100V.
4p100T.....100V.
4q100N.....100V.
4r100T.....100V.
4s100N....100T100V.
4t100T.....100V.
4v75N.....100V.
4w100T.....100V.
5a73.9T....43.5E8.7V.
6a76.3N,0.49D/G...0.491.71E0.24V100
6b100T......100
6c......100V100
6d100T.....100V100
6e80T.....100V100
6f100T.....100V100
6g100N....50E100V100
6h100N.....80V,20A100
6i......100V100
6j100N.....100V100
6k100T.....100V100
6l25N,25T.12.5V...100V100
6m100T......100
6n100N.....100V100
6o100T.....100V100
6p100T.....100V100
6q100T.....100V100
6r100T.....100V100
6s66.7T.....100V100
6t100T.....100V100
6u100T.....100V100
6v100T.....100V100
6w......100V100
6xa100T.....100V100
6xb100T.....50V100
6xc100T......100
6xd66.7N.....100V100
6xe100T.....100V100
6xf100T.....100V100
7a100G....100Q100V100
7b.....100Q..

Notes: Data are presented as %. The dot denotes 0%. aNot all the positions were analyzed using the same number of sequences. The first figure is the lowest number, and the second figure is the largest number. n.a.: not applicable because of different natural amino acid sequences in the respective HCV genotype/subtype (NS3 V170 and M175 are the dominant amino acids in GT1b).

Table 2

(Continued).

SubtypeL31FIMPVWP32ALQRSQ54HH58DLNcE62DLA92KPTdY93CFILNRSTWY93H
1a0.65M0.03L,0.07S96.520.10D,0.10N1.4D0.51P0.24C,0.17N, 0.07F, 0.03S0.41
1b2.63M,0.27I,0.05F0.05S26.763.43S,0.8T,0.48L,0.48A,0.05R0.05D,0.21L1.28T0.05C, 0.05F, 0.05S4.25
1c..75.00.50D.25N25.00
1d100M.......
1e50M.50.00..100T..
1g......100F.
1h........
1i..100.....
1j........
1k........
1l100M.33.33.....
1m50M...50D.50.00C50.00
1n....100D...
2a82.7M.....1.92F.
2b64.8M....0.69A,0.69S..
2c11.1M.......
2d........
2e100M....100S..
2f100M....50S..
2i100M.......
2j100M.......
2k75M.25.00..25A..
2l....50L100S..
2m100M....100S..
2q50M.......
2r100M.......
2t........
2u100M.......
3a0.18P..0.09L3.32L.0.36C, 0.09F1.35
3b84.2M,5.26V...36.8D...
3d100M.......
3e........
3g50M,50V.......
3h........
3i........
3k100M...100L...
........
4a3.33V.100.10D..3.33
4b..100.50D50P50T50.00
4c..100.....
4d..100.....
4f..100.....
4g..100...33.3R33.33
4k66.7L.100.....
4l..100.....
4m..100.....
4n33.3L.100.....
4o..100.25D...
4p..100.....
4q..100.....
4r85.7L.100.....
4s100L.100.....
4t..100.....
4v..100.....
4w..100...100S.
L31FIMPVW.......
5a........
6a0.86M.98.28.1.72L.0.86I, 0.86S.
6b..100100S....
6c..100100G.100P..
6d...100S..100I.
6e...7.69H..15.38S.
6f..94.4416.7S,5.56L....
6g........
6h..10020S....
6i..100.66.7D...
6j..75.0050A50D...
6k..25.00.87.5D...
6l....100D...
6m..100...100S.
6n..100...100S.
6o...100A..50S.
6p..100.....
6q..100.....
6r...33.3S....
6s..100.....
6t...100G....
6u......100S.
6v......100S.
6w..100.66.7D...
6xa..100.....
6xb....100D...
6xc........
6xd..10033.3A....
6xe..100...100S.
6xf........
7a....100L..100
7b.......100

Notes: Data are presented as %. The dot denotes 0%. aNot all the positions were analyzed using the same number of sequences. The first figure is the lowest number, and the second figure is the largest number. n.a. not applicable because of different natural amino acid sequences in the respective HCV genotype/subtype (NS5A K24, M28, Q30, and H58 are the dominant amino acids in GT1a; F28 is the dominant amino acid in subtype 2a and L28 in subtype 2b; A30 is the dominant amino acid in GT3; T93 is the dominant amino acid in GT6). bFor GT1b, Q24K was screened; for GT3 and GT2 except GT2a, S24FHT were screened. cFor GT1b, P58A/D/G/L/R/S/T was screened; for GT6, T58A/D/G/H/L/N/S were screened. dFor GT2, C92A/K/N/R/S/T was screened; for GT3, E92K were screened.No sequences harbored S38F. K26E was found in 0.11% of 1a, and 0.27% of 3a sequences.

Table 3

(Continued).

Sub typeNS5B NNI RAS position
C316NYHFS368TN411SM414TIVC445FE446KQY448CHA553ITVG554SDS556GNRG558RD559GN
1a0.02N, 0.09Y..0.11T.0.11Q, 0.04K0.07H, 0.04C0.06V.0.79G,0.34R, 0.11N0.42.
1b43.09N, 0.09Y,1.19H0.03.0.14T, 0.32I,0.03V0.6798.46Q0.26H, 0.03C.0.09D11.77G,0.83N0.090.05N
1c............
1d.....100Q......
1e10.17N...........
1g5.26Y, 2.63H....20Q......
1h....100.......
1i.....100Q......
1j............
1k......100H.....
1l2.50H...........
1m............
1n............
2a0.14Y...100..100V.100G..
2b....100..95.37V.100G..
2c....100..87.5V, 6.25I100S100G..
2d....100..100V.100G..
2e....100..87.5V.100G..
2f....100..75V25I.100G..
2i....100..100100S100G..
2j....100..50V, 33.3I, 16.7T.100G..
2k3.12H...90.99.09Q.88.89V.88.9G..
2l....100..100V.100G..
2m....100..100V100S100G..
2q....100..100V.100G..
2r7.69N, 7.69Y...100..100V.100G..
2t....100..100V....
2u....100..100V.100G..
3a0.03Y.0.34.99.70.12Q.100V1.04S97.8G.1.11N
3b....1000.99Q0.33H100V.100G..
3d....100100Q.100V.100G..
3e....100..100V.100G..
3g....100..100V.100G..
3h....100..100V.100G..
3i....100..100V.100G..
3k....100..100V.100G..
4a0.48N..91.4V,7.76I100..100V.100G..
4b14.29N, 7.14H..50V100..100V.100G..
4c5.66Y, 3.77H..100I100..100V.100G..
4d0.16Y..2.80T, 96.8I100..100V.100G..
4f81.61N..83.3V,16.7I100..100V.100G..
4g6.25H...100..100V.100G..
4k0.79Y, 4.76H...100..100V.100G..
4l....100..100V.100G..
4m....100..100V.100G..
4n4.35Y...100..100V.100G..
4o....100..100V.100G..
4p....100..100V.100G..
4q....100..100V.100G..
4r60.3H,0.79N..9.09I100..100V.75N..
4s....100..100V.100G..
4t....100..100V.100G..
4v....100..100V.100G..
4w....100..100V.100G..
5a....98.1..100V5.41S97.3G..
6a....100.0.41H..0.84R..
6b....100.......
6c....100.......
6d....100.......
6e0.72Y2.33..98.2....5.26G,94.7R..
6f....100.......
6g....100.......
6h....100....85.71G..
6i..11.1.100.......
6j....100.......
6k....100.......
6l....100......10.0G
6m....100.......
6n...1.16V100.1.16H..12.5R..
6o....100..25V.75R..
6p....100..50V.100R..
6q....100....100R..
6r....100.......
6s....100..100V.100R..
6t....100....25R..
6u....100....100R..
6v....100.......
6w....100.......
6xa....100.......
6xb....100.......
6xc....100....100R..
6xd....100......33.3G
6xe....100.......
6xf....100....100R..
7a....100..100V.100G..
7b....100...100S100G..

Notes: Data are presented as %. The dot denotes 0%. C451S were detected in 1.05% of 1b sequences, G188D in 0.82% of 3a, N224I in 3.06% of 3a and in 3.45% of 6k, A395G in 0.75% of 4a, and Y561H in 0.10% of 1b. L314H, N444K, S565F were not found. aNot all the positions were analyzed using the same number of sequences. The first figure is the lowest number, and the second figure is the largest number.

  56 in total

1.  Interferon lambda 4 genotypes and resistance-associated variants in patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotypes 1 and 3.

Authors:  Kai-Henrik Peiffer; Lisa Sommer; Simone Susser; Johannes Vermehren; Eva Herrmann; Matthias Döring; Julia Dietz; Dany Perner; Caterina Berkowski; Stefan Zeuzem; Christoph Sarrazin
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 17.425

2.  Infrequent development of resistance in genotype 1-6 hepatitis C virus-infected subjects treated with sofosbuvir in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials.

Authors:  Evguenia S Svarovskaia; Hadas Dvory-Sobol; Neil Parkin; Christy Hebner; Viktoria Gontcharova; Ross Martin; Wen Ouyang; Bin Han; Simin Xu; Karin Ku; Sophia Chiu; Edward Gane; Ira M Jacobson; David R Nelson; Eric Lawitz; David L Wyles; Neby Bekele; Diana Brainard; William T Symonds; John G McHutchison; Michael D Miller; Hongmei Mo
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Global epidemiology of HCV subtypes and resistance-associated substitutions evaluated by sequencing-based subtype analyses.

Authors:  Tania M Welzel; Neeru Bhardwaj; Charlotte Hedskog; Krishna Chodavarapu; Gregory Camus; John McNally; Diana Brainard; Michael D Miller; Hongmei Mo; Evguenia Svarovskaia; Ira Jacobson; Stefan Zeuzem; Kosh Agarwal
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 25.083

4.  Prevalence and characteristics of naturally occurring sofosbuvir resistance-associated variants in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection.

Authors:  Jun Ito; Goki Suda; Yoshiya Yamamoto; Atsushi Nagasaka; Ken Furuya; Kenichi Kumagai; Hideaki Kikuchi; Takuto Miyagishima; Tomoe Kobayashi; Megumi Kimura; Kazushi Yamasaki; Machiko Umemura; Takaaki Izumi; Seiji Tsunematsu; Fumiyuki Sato; Yoko Tsukuda; Katsumi Terashita; Masato Nakai; Takuya Sho; Mitsuteru Natsuizaka; Kenichi Morikawa; Koji Ogawa; Naoya Sakamoto
Journal:  Hepatol Res       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 4.288

5.  Peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin for 12 vs. 24 weeks in HCV genotype 2 or 3.

Authors:  Alessandra Mangia; Rosanna Santoro; Nicola Minerva; Giovanni L Ricci; Vito Carretta; Marcello Persico; Francesco Vinelli; Gaetano Scotto; Donato Bacca; Mauro Annese; Mario Romano; Franco Zechini; Fernando Sogari; Fulvio Spirito; Angelo Andriulli
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  In Vitro Susceptibility of Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 through 6 Clinical Isolates to the Pangenotypic NS3/4A Inhibitor Voxilaprevir.

Authors:  Bin Han; Bandita Parhy; Julia Lu; David Hsieh; Gregory Camus; Ross Martin; Evguenia S Svarovskaia; Hongmei Mo; Hadas Dvory-Sobol
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  IFNL4 ss469415590 polymorphism contributes to treatment decisions in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1b, but not 2a, infection.

Authors:  Ruihong Wu; Xiumei Chi; Xiaomei Wang; Haibo Sun; Juan Lv; Xiuzhu Gao; Ge Yu; Fei Kong; Hongqin Xu; Rui Hua; Jing Jiang; Bing Sun; Jin Zhong; Yu Pan; Junqi Niu
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 3.342

8.  Polymorphisms and resistance mutations of hepatitis C virus on sequences in the European hepatitis C virus database.

Authors:  Dimas Alexandre Kliemann; Cristiane Valle Tovo; Ana Beatriz Gorini da Veiga; Angelo Alves de Mattos; Charles Wood
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  In Vitro Antiviral Activity and Resistance Profile of the Next-Generation Hepatitis C Virus NS3/4A Protease Inhibitor Glecaprevir.

Authors:  Teresa I Ng; Rakesh Tripathi; Thomas Reisch; Liangjun Lu; Timothy Middleton; Todd A Hopkins; Ron Pithawalla; Michelle Irvin; Tatyana Dekhtyar; Preethi Krishnan; Gretja Schnell; Jill Beyer; Keith F McDaniel; Jun Ma; Guoqiang Wang; Li-Juan Jiang; Yat Sun Or; Dale Kempf; Tami Pilot-Matias; Christine Collins
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Natural prevalence of NS5A polymorphisms in subjects infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 3 and their effects on the antiviral activity of NS5A inhibitors.

Authors:  Dennis Hernandez; Nannan Zhou; Joseph Ueland; Aaron Monikowski; Fiona McPhee
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 3.168

View more
  4 in total

1.  Extended interaction networks with HCV protease NS3-4A substrates explain the lack of adaptive capability against protease inhibitors.

Authors:  Georg Dultz; Tetsuro Shimakami; Markus Schneider; Kazuhisa Murai; Daisuke Yamane; Antoine Marion; Tobias M Zeitler; Claudia Stross; Christian Grimm; Rebecca M Richter; Katrin Bäumer; MinKyung Yi; Ricardo M Biondi; Stefan Zeuzem; Robert Tampé; Iris Antes; Christian M Lange; Christoph Welsch
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Chronic Infection with Hepatitis C Virus Subtype 1g in a Japanese Patient Successfully Treated with Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir.

Authors:  Takeshi Hatanaka; Satoru Kakizaki; Takuya Kaburagi; Naoto Saito; Sachi Nakano; Yoichi Hazama; Sachiko Yoshida; Yoko Hachisu; Yoshiki Tanaka; Teruo Yoshinaga; Kenji Kashiwabara; Atsushi Naganuma; Yuichi Yamazaki; Toshio Uraoka; Shigeo Nagashima; Masaharu Takahashi; Tsutomu Nishizawa; Kazumoto Murata; Hiroaki Okamoto
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 1.282

3.  Phylodynamic Analysis and Implication of HCV Genotype 4 Variability on Antiviral Drug Response and T-Cell Recognition.

Authors:  Giuseppina Maria Elena Colomba; Noemi Urone; Vito di Marco; Donatella Ferraro
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 5.048

4.  Diversity of the hepatitis C virus NS5B gene during HIV co-infection.

Authors:  Tshegofatso Ngwaga; Ling Kong; Derrick Lin; Cassandra Schoborg; Lynn E Taylor; Kenneth H Mayer; Robert S Klein; David D Celentano; Jack D Sobel; Denise J Jamieson; Caroline C King; John E Tavis; Jason T Blackard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.