| Literature DB >> 31571731 |
Xiu Ting Yiew1, Samantha Clarke1, Allan Willms1, Shane W Bateman1.
Abstract
Conventional geometric formulas for estimating bladder volume assume that bladders have a perfectly uniform spheroid geometry. Bladders are often irregularly shaped, however, especially when under-filled or distorted by a full colon, which results in inaccurate ultrasonographic linear measurements and volume estimation. This pilot study investigates the feasibility, inter-observer reliability (reproducibility), robustness, and agreement of a novel 3-dimensional bladder volume computation method using bladder circumference tracing compared to a published feline linear bladder dimension formula. Paired sets of longitudinal and transverse B-mode bladder ultrasound images (n = 228) were acquired by 2 observers with different point-of-care ultrasonography skills using 10 healthy purpose-bred cats positioned in dorsal recumbency at various time points. Using strict criteria for Lin's concordance correlation coefficient, inter-observer agreements (n = 223) were found to be substantial (0.95 to 0.99) with statistically significant but clinically non-significant median differences (biases) of 0.96 mL [interquartile range (IQR): 0.16 to 2.46, P < 0.001] and 0.23 mL (IQR: 0.88 to 1.97, P = 0.006) when bladder circumference tracings were made on similar sets of ultrasound images respectively. Inter-observer agreements improved from substantial (0.95 to 0.99) to almost perfect (> 0.99) strength-of-agreement as the quality of ultrasound images improved. The bladder circumference tracing method showed moderate (0.90 to 0.95) strength-of-agreement with the recently published feline linear bladder dimension formula, with significant additive median differences (biases) of -6.76 mL (IQR: -9.06 to -3.88, P < 0.001) and -6.44 mL (IQR: -11.41 to -3.81, P < 0.001) recorded by each observer (n = 111, n = 83), respectively. Data obtained from orthogonal ultrasonographic bladder circumference tracings justify further investigation into use of this method for estimating bladder volume in cats. Copyright and/or publishing rights held by the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31571731 PMCID: PMC6753888
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Can J Vet Res ISSN: 0830-9000 Impact factor: 1.310