Mary J Thomson1,2, Arthur Taylor3, Pratima Sharma4, Anna S Lok4,5, Elliot B Tapper4,5,6. 1. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, 3912 Taubman Center, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. maryjt@med.umich.edu. 2. Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. maryjt@med.umich.edu. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 4. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, 3912 Taubman Center, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. 5. Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 6. Veterans Affairs Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Type 1 hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a fatal complication of cirrhosis. Treatments trend toward HRS reversal, but few show clear mortality benefit. We sought to quantify the progress-or lack thereof-in improving outcomes of type 1 HRS over time. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing type 1 HRS outcomes including (a) overall survival (liver transplant-free survival if reported) and (b) HRS reversal. Each study arm was analyzed separately to look at changes in outcomes over time. RCTs published comparing medical treatments for type 1 HRS were searched using several databases through July 31, 2019. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs (28 arms) involving 778 participants enrolled between 2002 and 2018 were included. Twelve RCTs measured HRS reversal. In conjunction with albumin (or plasma expander), the most common medications used were terlipressin (13 arms), antibiotics (7), norepinephrine (6), dopamine (4), and midodrine/octreotide (3). Pooled survival rate was 34.6% (95% CI 26.4-43.8), and pooled HRS reversal rate was 42.8% (95% CI 34.2-51.9). Regression analyzing the incremental effect of the year the RCT was initiated showed that more recent studies were not associated with improved survival (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.94-1.11, p = 0.66) or HRS reversal rates (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.96-1.11, p = 0.41). There was no survival improvement when RCTs with endpoints assessed ≤ or > 1 month were analyzed separately with respective OR of 1.07 (95% CI 0.95-1.20, p = 0.26) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.85-1.12, p = 0.70). CONCLUSION: Outcomes have not improved for patients with type 1 HRS since 2002. There is a need to improve prevention and treatment of type 1 HRS.
INTRODUCTION:Type 1 hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a fatal complication of cirrhosis. Treatments trend toward HRS reversal, but few show clear mortality benefit. We sought to quantify the progress-or lack thereof-in improving outcomes of type 1 HRS over time. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing type 1 HRS outcomes including (a) overall survival (liver transplant-free survival if reported) and (b) HRS reversal. Each study arm was analyzed separately to look at changes in outcomes over time. RCTs published comparing medical treatments for type 1 HRS were searched using several databases through July 31, 2019. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs (28 arms) involving 778 participants enrolled between 2002 and 2018 were included. Twelve RCTs measured HRS reversal. In conjunction with albumin (or plasma expander), the most common medications used were terlipressin (13 arms), antibiotics (7), norepinephrine (6), dopamine (4), and midodrine/octreotide (3). Pooled survival rate was 34.6% (95% CI 26.4-43.8), and pooled HRS reversal rate was 42.8% (95% CI 34.2-51.9). Regression analyzing the incremental effect of the year the RCT was initiated showed that more recent studies were not associated with improved survival (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.94-1.11, p = 0.66) or HRS reversal rates (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.96-1.11, p = 0.41). There was no survival improvement when RCTs with endpoints assessed ≤ or > 1 month were analyzed separately with respective OR of 1.07 (95% CI 0.95-1.20, p = 0.26) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.85-1.12, p = 0.70). CONCLUSION: Outcomes have not improved for patients with type 1 HRS since 2002. There is a need to improve prevention and treatment of type 1 HRS.
Authors: Thomas D Boyer; Arun J Sanyal; Florence Wong; R Todd Frederick; John R Lake; Jacqueline G O'Leary; Daniel Ganger; Khurram Jamil; Stephen Chris Pappas Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Arun J Sanyal; Thomas Boyer; Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao; Frederick Regenstein; Lorenzo Rossaro; Beate Appenrodt; Andres Blei; Veit Gülberg; Samuel Sigal; Peter Teuber Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2008-02-13 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: C Alessandria; A Ottobrelli; W Debernardi-Venon; L Todros; M Torrani Cerenzia; S Martini; F Balzola; A Morgando; M Rizzetto; A Marzano Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2007-05-24 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: V Arroyo; P Ginès; A L Gerbes; F J Dudley; P Gentilini; G Laffi; T B Reynolds; H Ring-Larsen; J Schölmerich Journal: Hepatology Date: 1996-01 Impact factor: 17.425