Literature DB >> 31570972

Correlation between Shapley values of rooted phylogenetic trees under the beta-splitting model.

Michael Fuchs1, Ariel R Paningbatan2.   

Abstract

In recent years, several different versions of the Shapley value have been introduced in phylogenetics for the purpose of ranking biodiversity data in order to decide whether to preserve the data or not. Two of these Shapley values are the rooted and unrooted Shapley value which have been compared with the fair proportion index since this index is easier to compute. In particular, it was proved for the former that it is identical with the fair proportion index and numerical data was presented by several authors that the latter is strongly correlated with the fair proportion index. In this paper, we will prove a theoretical result which supports this observation. More precisely, we will prove that in random phylogenetic trees under the [Formula: see text]-splitting model, the correlation coefficient between the unrooted Shapley value and the fair proportion index indeed tends to one for all [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text]. We also present data which suggests that the convergence worsens as [Formula: see text] is approaching [Formula: see text].

Keywords:  Beta-splitting model; Biodiversity; Correlation; Fair proportion index; Shapley value

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31570972     DOI: 10.1007/s00285-019-01435-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.259


  6 in total

1.  Which random processes describe the tree of life? A large-scale study of phylogenetic tree imbalance.

Authors:  Michael G B Blum; Olivier François
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  The Shapley value of phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  Claus-Jochen Haake; Akemi Kashiwada; Francis Edward Su
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Equality of Shapley value and fair proportion index in phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  Michael Fuchs; Emma Yu Jin
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 2.259

4.  Comparing the rankings obtained from two biodiversity indices: the Fair Proportion Index and the Shapley Value.

Authors:  Kristina Wicke; Mareike Fischer
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  The equivalence of two phylogenetic biodiversity measures: the Shapley value and Fair Proportion index.

Authors:  Klaas Hartmann
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  Biodiversity, Shapley value and phylogenetic trees: some remarks.

Authors:  Hubert Stahn
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.259

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Biodiversity, Shapley value and phylogenetic trees: some remarks.

Authors:  Hubert Stahn
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Mathematical indices for the influence of risk factors on the lethality of a disease.

Authors:  Ricardo Martínez; Joaquín Sánchez-Soriano
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.259

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.