Literature DB >> 31570522

Mass cytometry-based single-cell analysis of human stem cell reprogramming uncovers differential regulation of specific pluripotency markers.

Ilkyun Im1, Ye Seul Son1,2, Kwang Bo Jung1,2, Insoo Kang3,4,5, Boon-Eng Teh6, Kyung-Bok Lee7, Mi-Young Son8,2, Janghwan Kim9,2.   

Abstract

Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) are reprogrammed from somatic cells and are regarded as promising sources for regenerative medicine and disease research. Recently, techniques for analyses of individual cells, such as single-cell RNA-Seq and mass cytometry, have been used to understand the stem cell reprogramming process in the mouse. However, the reprogramming process in hiPSCs remains poorly understood. Here we used mass cytometry to analyze the expression of pluripotency and cell cycle markers in the reprogramming of human stem cells. We confirmed that, during reprogramming, the main cell population was shifted to an intermediate population consisting of neither fibroblasts nor hiPSCs. Detailed population analyses using computational approaches, including dimensional reduction by spanning-tree progression analysis of density-normalized events, PhenoGraph, and diffusion mapping, revealed several distinct cell clusters representing the cells along the reprogramming route. Interestingly, correlation analysis of various markers in hiPSCs revealed that the pluripotency marker TRA-1-60 behaves in a pattern that is different from other pluripotency markers. Furthermore, we found that the expression pattern of another pluripotency marker, octamer-binding protein 4 (OCT4), was distinctive in the pHistone-H3high population (M phase) of the cell cycle. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first mass cytometry-based investigation of human reprogramming and pluripotency. Our analysis elucidates several aspects of hiPSC reprogramming, including several intermediate cell clusters active during the process of reprogramming and distinctive marker expression patterns in hiPSCs.
© 2019 Im et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  OCT4; TRA-1–60; cell cycle; computational biology; iPS cell; iPSC; induced pluripotent stem cell; mass cytometry; pluripotency; reprogramming; single-cell analysis; spanning-tree progression analysis of density-normalized events (SPADE)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31570522      PMCID: PMC6901311          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.009061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  54 in total

1.  A mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition initiates and is required for the nuclear reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts.

Authors:  Ronghui Li; Jialiang Liang; Su Ni; Ting Zhou; Xiaobing Qing; Huapeng Li; Wenzhi He; Jiekai Chen; Feng Li; Qiang Zhuang; Baoming Qin; Jianyong Xu; Wen Li; Jiayin Yang; Yi Gan; Dajiang Qin; Shipeng Feng; Hong Song; Dongshan Yang; Biliang Zhang; Lingwen Zeng; Liangxue Lai; Miguel Angel Esteban; Duanqing Pei
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 24.633

Review 2.  Effects of cell cycle status on early events in retroviral replication.

Authors:  Richard A Katz; James G Greger; Anna Marie Skalka
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 4.429

3.  Direct reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts to neural progenitors.

Authors:  Janghwan Kim; Jem A Efe; Saiyong Zhu; Maria Talantova; Xu Yuan; Shufen Wang; Stuart A Lipton; Kang Zhang; Sheng Ding
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Web-based analysis and publication of flow cytometry experiments.

Authors:  Nikesh Kotecha; Peter O Krutzik; Jonathan M Irish
Journal:  Curr Protoc Cytom       Date:  2010-07

5.  Data-Driven Phenotypic Dissection of AML Reveals Progenitor-like Cells that Correlate with Prognosis.

Authors:  Jacob H Levine; Erin F Simonds; Sean C Bendall; Kara L Davis; El-ad D Amir; Michelle D Tadmor; Oren Litvin; Harris G Fienberg; Astraea Jager; Eli R Zunder; Rachel Finck; Amanda L Gedman; Ina Radtke; James R Downing; Dana Pe'er; Garry P Nolan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  The TRA-1-60 and TRA-1-81 human pluripotent stem cell markers are expressed on podocalyxin in embryonal carcinoma.

Authors:  William M Schopperle; William C DeWolf
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 6.277

7.  Human induced pluripotent stem cells free of vector and transgene sequences.

Authors:  Junying Yu; Kejin Hu; Kim Smuga-Otto; Shulan Tian; Ron Stewart; Igor I Slukvin; James A Thomson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  High-dimensional analysis of the murine myeloid cell system.

Authors:  Burkhard Becher; Andreas Schlitzer; Jinmiao Chen; Florian Mair; Hermi R Sumatoh; Karen Wei Weng Teng; Donovan Low; Christiane Ruedl; Paola Riccardi-Castagnoli; Michael Poidinger; Melanie Greter; Florent Ginhoux; Evan W Newell
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 25.606

9.  Three monoclonal antibodies defining distinct differentiation antigens associated with different high molecular weight polypeptides on the surface of human embryonal carcinoma cells.

Authors:  P W Andrews; G Banting; I Damjanov; D Arnaud; P Avner
Journal:  Hybridoma       Date:  1984

10.  The cell cycle and virus infection.

Authors:  Stevan R Emmett; Brian Dove; Laura Mahoney; Torsten Wurm; Julian A Hiscox
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2005
View more
  2 in total

1.  Specificity of anti-MYC antibodies.

Authors:  Giorgio Cattoretti
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Reply to Cattoretti: Specificity of anti-MYC antibodies.

Authors:  Ilkyun Im; Ye Seul Son; Kwang Bo Jung; Insoo Kang; Boon-Eng Teh; Kyung-Bok Lee; Mi-Young Son; Janghwan Kim
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 5.157

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.