| Literature DB >> 31570392 |
H Pelling1,2, L J Bock3, J Nzakizwanayo1, M E Wand3, E L Denham1, W M MacFarlane2, J M Sutton3, B V Jones4.
Abstract
Proteus mirabilis is a common pathogen of the catheterised urinary tract and often described as intrinsically resistant to the biocide chlorhexidine (CHD). Here we demonstrate that de-repression of the smvA efflux system has occurred in clinical isolates of P. mirabilis and reduces susceptibility to CHD and other cationic biocides. Compared to other isolates examined, P. mirabilis RS47 exhibited a significantly higher CHD MIC (≥512 μg/ml) and significantly greater expression of smvA. Comparison of the RS47 smvA and cognate smvR repressor with sequences from other isolates, indicated that RS47 encodes an inactivated smvR. Complementation of RS47 with a functional smvR from isolate RS50a (which exhibited the lowest smvA expression and lowest CHD MIC) reduced smvA expression by ∼59-fold, and markedly lowered the MIC of CHD and other cationic biocides. Although complementation of RS47 did not reduce MICs to concentrations observed in isolate RS50a, the significantly lower polymyxin B MIC of RS50a indicated that differences in LPS structure are also a factor in P. mirabilis CHD susceptibility. To determine if exposure to CHD can select for mutations in smvR, clinical isolates with the lowest CHD MICs were adapted to grow at increasing concentrations of CHD up to 512 μg/ml. Analysis of the smvR in adapted populations indicated that mutations predicted to inactivate smvR occurred following CHD exposure in some isolates. Collectively, our data show that smvA de-repression contributes to reduced biocide susceptibility in P. mirabilis, but differences in LPS structure between strains are also likely to be an important factor.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31570392 PMCID: PMC6879213 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01535-19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother ISSN: 0066-4804 Impact factor: 5.191
Susceptibility of P. mirabilis clinical isolates to chlorhexidine digluconate
| Isolate | MIC (μg/ml) |
|---|---|
| B2 | 32–128 |
| B4 | 32–64 |
| RS1 | 16 |
| RS6 | 32–64 |
| RS17 | 16–64 |
| RS18 | 32–64 |
| RS28 | 128–256 |
| RS40 | 32 |
| RS47 | ≥512 |
| RS50a | 8–16 |
FIG 1Comparison of SmvAR sequences. The smvAR locus was identified in draft genome sequences from P. mirabilis isolates analyzed for CHD susceptibility. Translated SmvR and SmvA amino acid sequences from all isolates were compared further by ClustalW alignment. (A) Shows alignments of SmvA sequences. B) Shows alignments of SmvR sequences. Amino acid residues that varied from the majority consensus between isolates are highlighted by symbols. The ∼22-amino acid truncation at the C terminus of RS47 SmvR is highlighted by the black dashed box.
FIG 2Expression of smvA in Proteus mirabilis strains. Quantitative real-time PCR was used to measure the expression of smvA in selected P. mirabilis isolates. Isolates chosen represent SmvR sequences with the range of amino acid variations observed (Fig. 2). A calibration curve of plasmid DNA containing an smvA fragment was used to determine absolute quantification. Expression of smvA is shown as copies per ng of cDNA template used. Data represent the mean of three biological replicates, with two technical replicates performed in each. Error bars show standard error of the mean. One-away ANOVA and Bonferroni’s post hoc test were performed comparing RS50a to other P. mirabilis strains. ****, P ≤ 0.0001 versus RS50a. The average fold difference in smvA expression of each isolate relative to RS50a is provided by numbers on bars.
FIG 3SmvA expression in Proteus mirabilis following chlorhexidine digluconate exposure. Quantitative real-time PCR was used to measure the expression of smvA in P. mirabilis following exposure to a sub-MIC of CHD. Exposure was to 4 μg/ml (0.25× RS50a MIC) for 15 min, and copies of smvA per nanogram cDNA template calculated. Data are expressed as fold change in svmA expression in CHD-exposed cells relative to unexposed cells. Data represent the mean of three biological replicates (with duplicated technical replicates for each), and error bars show standard error of the mean. Symbols indicate statistical significance of changes in smvA expression for each isolate compared with cells without CHD exposure. Statistical comparisons between CHD-exposed cells and unexposed cells of each isolate performed using a t test. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01.
FIG 4Impact of smvR complementation of RS47 smvA expression. Quantitative real-time PCR was used to measure the expression of smvA in the wild-type RS47 isolate and the derivatives RS47::RS50AsmvR and RS47::pGEM-Tempty, harboring constructs with a functional copy of smvR or empty vector, respectively. Expression of smvA is shown as copies per nanogram of cDNA template from each strain. Data represent the mean of three biological replicates (with duplicated technical replicates performed in each), and error bars show standard error of the mean. One-way ANOVA and Bonferroni’s post hoc test were performed to identify significant differences in smvA expression between the wild type and transformants. *, P ≤ 0.01 versus RS47.
MIC values of various antibiotics and biocides for wild-type and complemented isolates
| Antimicrobial | MIC (μg/ml) by isolate | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RS50a | RS47 | RS47::pGEM-Tempty | RS47::RS50A | |
| Biocides | ||||
| CHD | 8–16 | ≥512 | >512 | 128–256 |
| OCT | 1–2 | 64–128 | 32–64 | 4–32 |
| BZK | 16 | 128 | 64–128 | 16–32 |
| CET | 8 | 256–512 | 256–512 | 32–64 |
| CPC | 4 | 256–512 | 128–256 | 16 |
| CTAB | 8 | 256–512 | 256–512 | 8 |
| HDPCM | 4–8 | 256 | 64–128 | 16–32 |
| Antibiotics | ||||
| PMB | 128 to 256 | >2,048 | >2,048 | >2,048 |
| NAL | 4 to 8 | 4 | 2 to 4 | 4 |
| FOF | 128 | 256 to 512 | 256 | 256 to 512 |
| GEN | 16 | 8 to ≥16 | 4 to 16 | 4 to 16 |
| CHL | 32 | 16 to 32 | 8 to 16 | 8 to 16 |
| TMP | 4 to 8 | 4 to 8 | 1 to 4 | 2 to 4 |
| CIP | 0.016 to 0.06 | 0.06 to 0.25 | 0.03 to 0.125 | 0.03 to 0.06 |
| AMX | 4 | 2 | * | * |
CHD, chlorhexidine digluconate; OCT, octenidine; BZK, benzalkonium chloride; CET, cetrimide; CPC, cetylpyridinium chloride; CTAB, cetrimonium bromide; HDPCM, hexadecylpyridinium chloride monohydrate; NAL, nalidixic acid; FOF, fosfomycin; GEN, gentamicin; CHL, chloramphenicol; TMP, trimethoprim; CIP, ciprofloxacin; AMX; amoxicillin.
*, Isolates that required ampicillin selection were not tested against amoxicillin.
Analysis of smvR mutations arising in chlorhexidine-adapted populations
| Parent | NT | Mutation | Frequency | Amino acid change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B4 | 7 | C>T | 1.5 | R3C |
| 15 | A>C | 5.4 | R5S | |
| 85 | A>G | 10.0 | T29A | |
| 101 | C>T | 1.4 | A34V | |
| 282 | (ATGATCAC)1>2 | 7.4 | D95M, K96I, L97T, S98I, F99S, A100S, K101L, G102L, A103P, S104K, L105E, M106P, | |
| 307 | G>T | 2.2 | A103S | |
| 323 | C>T | 3.3 | A108V | |
| 460 | C>T | 1.4 | R154W | |
| 467 | Δ14 bp | 1.3 | F156Y, | |
| 530 | T>G | 11.1 | L177R | |
| RS1 | 10 | C>T | 13.7 | |
| 101 | C>T | 2.0 | A34V | |
| 292 | T>C | 15.3 | S98P | |
| 313 | T>G | 33.4 | L105V | |
| RS50a | 70 | G>A | 100 | G14R |
NT, nucleotide position in smvR.
Mutations, NT substitution (e.g., C > T); duplication (e.g., [ATGATCAC] 1 > 2); deletion (e.g., Δ14 bp).
Frequency, predicted frequency of sequences containing the mutation.
Amino acid change, reference aa; aa position; new aa. Substitutions highlighted in bold indicate those where mutations lead to formation of a stop codon (*), predicted to truncate the translated protein at the indicated position.
FIG 5Impact of smvA overexpression on P. mirabilis crystalline biofilm formation. In vitro infection models simulating catheter-associated urinary tract infection were used to determine if smvA derepression influences crystalline biofilm formaiton. Models were used to simulate established infections with starting cell numbers of ∼108 CFU/ml in residual “bladder” urine and ability to form crystalline biofilms assessed by time taken for catheters to become blocked. (A) Time taken for catheters to block. (B) pH of residual bladder urine at time of blockage. (C) Viable cells in residual bladder urine at catheter blockage. Data represent the mean from a minimum of four replicate experiments, and error bars show standard error of the mean. No statistically significant differences in time to blockage or pH and CFU/ml at blockage between isolates tested were identified (t test).
List of isolates and derivatives used in this study
| Strain by bacterial species | Comment(s) | Source |
|---|---|---|
| B2 | Clinical isolate from urinary tract infection. | Royal Sussex County Hospital or Bristol Southmead Hospital |
| B4 | Clinical isolate from urinary tract infection. | Royal Sussex County Hospital or Bristol Southmead Hospital |
| RS1 | Clinical isolate from urinary tract infection. | Royal Sussex County Hospital or Bristol Southmead Hospital |
| RS6 | Clinical isolate from urinary tract infection. | Royal Sussex County Hospital or Bristol Southmead Hospital |
| RS17 | Clinical isolate from urinary tract infection. | Royal Sussex County Hospital or Bristol Southmead Hospital |
| RS18 | Clinical isolate from urinary tract infection. | Royal Sussex County Hospital or Bristol Southmead Hospital |
| RS28 | Clinical isolate from urinary tract infection. | Royal Sussex County Hospital or Bristol Southmead Hospital |
| RS40 | Clinical isolate from urinary tract infection. | Royal Sussex County Hospital or Bristol Southmead Hospital |
| RS47 | Displays high level chlorhexidine resistance (≥512 μg/ml) and de-repression of the smvA efflux system. Clinical isolate from urinary tract infection. | Royal Sussex County Hospital or Bristol Southmead Hospital |
| RS50a | Clinical isolate from urinary tract infection. | Royal Sussex County Hospital or Bristol Southmead Hospital |
| RS47:RS50AsmvR | Derivative of isolate RS47 harboring functional copy of | This study |
| RS47:pGEM-Tempty | Derivative of isolate RS47 harboring empty pGEM-T vector Used as control for studies of effect of | This study |
| JM109 | Standard cloning strain. Used as intermediate host for plasmid constructs harboring RS50A | Promega, UK |
List of primers used in this study
| Target | Primer | Sequence (5′–3′) | Product, application, comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| SMVA-F | TCGCCACCCTTATTGCCATT | qPCR primer for | |
| SMVA-R | CGGCGACTAACTGTAAGCGT | qPCR primer for | |
| SMVA3-F | CCTCACTTTTCGGGACAACG | Amplification of | |
| SMVA3-R | ACCTAAACGCGCTAGCCAAA | Amplification of | |
| SMVR-BAMHI-F | Amplification of RS50a | ||
| SMVR-BAMHI-R | Amplification of RS50a | ||
| SMVR-2-F | GCGCGATTTAATCAGGTGGT | Primer for region internal to | |
| SMVR-2-R | TTCTGGCGTTTGCAGTAACG | Primer for region internal to | |
| SMVR-FLANK2-F | CGTTGCAGGCATGCTCATAG | Amplification of | |
| SMVR-FLANK2-R | CGCCTCTGTGTATTCCGACT | Amplification of |