| Literature DB >> 31569805 |
Qianliang Ming1,2,3, Xin Dong4,5, Sijia Wu6, Bo Zhu7, Min Jia8, Chengjian Zheng9, Khalid Rahman10, Ting Han11, Luping Qin12.
Abstract
We have previously reported that Trichoderma atroviride, an endophytic fungus isolated from S. miltiorrhiza, promotes S. miltiorrhiza hairy root growth and significantly stimulates the biosynthesis of tanshinones specifically the polysaccharide fraction (PSF). However, this study only focused exclusively on six metabolites whilst ignoring changes to the whole metabolite composition of the S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots. In the present study, the dynamic metabonomic responses of S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots were investigated using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HRMSn). UHPLC-HRMS typical total ions chromatograms (TICs) of PSF-treated hairy root samples were different from the control. Moreover, the results of principal component analysis (PCA), partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) indicated that PSF-treated samples were significantly different from the control. Through the analysis of PLS-DA, a total of 114 and 99 differential metabolites were found from the positive and negative models respectively and a total of 33 differential metabolites were identified. Thus, S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots had been induced to regulate the metabolic profiling in response to PSF and the changes of the metabolic profiling contributed to promoting the biosynthesis of tanshinones notably whilst the biosynthesis of phenolic acids were slightly inhibited.Entities:
Keywords: Salvia miltiorrhiza; Trichoderma atroviride; UHPLC-HRMSn; hairy roots; metabolomics; polysaccharide
Year: 2019 PMID: 31569805 PMCID: PMC6843243 DOI: 10.3390/biom9100541
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1Typical ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HRMS) total ions chromatograms (TICs) of methanol extracts from the control and polysaccharide fraction (PSF)-treated S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots collected at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 d post-elicitation. ESI+: black line; ESI−: red line. The peak indicated by the arrow was casticin (C19H18O8) added into the extraction solvent methanol as an internal standard.
Figure 2Principal component analysis (PCA) scores plot derived from UHPLC-MS data both in positive mode and negative mode for extracts obtained from the control (C) and PSF-treated (T) S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots collected 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 d post-elicitation. 3C: black squares, 6C: blue rhombus, 12C: yellow triangles, 18C: olive rhombus, 24C: wine squares; 3T: red rhombus, 6T: green rhombus, 12T: pink squares, 18T: cyan triangles, 24T: yellow rhombus.
Parameters of PCA and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) models by the control and treated models.
| Time Point | Ion Model | Type | A | R2X | R2Y | Q2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 d | ESI+ | PCA | 2 | 0.658 | 0.495 | |
| PLS-DA | 4 | 0.761 | 0.991 | 0.864 | ||
| ESI− | PCA | 2 | 0.825 | 0.501 | ||
| PLS-DA | 2 | 0.777 | 0.593 | 0.239 | ||
| 6 d | ESI+ | PCA | 2 | 0.695 | 0.557 | |
| PLS-DA | 2 | 0.675 | 0.991 | 0.959 | ||
| ESI− | PCA | 2 | 0.655 | 0.470 | ||
| PLS-DA | 2 | 0.525 | 0.997 | 0.951 | ||
| 12 d | ESI+ | PCA | 2 | 0.788 | 0.683 | |
| PLS-DA | 2 | 0.744 | 0.996 | 0.974 | ||
| ESI− | PCA | 2 | 0.766 | 0.645 | ||
| PLS-DA | 2 | 0.760 | 0.992 | 0.981 | ||
| 18d | ESI+ | PCA | 3 | 0.880 | 0.635 | |
| PLS-DA | 2 | 0.755 | 0.993 | 0.958 | ||
| ESI− | PCA | 3 | 0.820 | 0.635 | ||
| PLS-DA | 2 | 0.68 | 0.994 | 0.923 | ||
| 24 d | ESI+ | PCA | 2 | 0.846 | 0.729 | |
| PLS-DA | 2 | 0.834 | 0.999 | 0.994 | ||
| ESI− | PCA | 2 | 0.819 | 0.682 | ||
| PLS-DA | 2 | 0.796 | 0.999 | 0.994 | ||
| 3–24 d | ESI+ | PCA | 12 | 0.889 | 0.759 | |
| PLS-DA | 19 | 0.925 | 0.941 | 0.627 | ||
| ESI− | PCA | 10 | 0.879 | 0.757 | ||
| PLS-DA | 13 | 0.897 | 0.966 | 0.79 | ||
| 3–24 d | ESI± | PCA | 11 | 0.876 | 0.771 | |
| PLS-DA | 18 | 0.912 | 0.953 | 0.654 |
Figure 3Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) dendrogram derived from UHPLC-HRMS data both in positive and negative modes for extracts obtained from the control (C) and PSF-treated (T) S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots collected 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 d post-elicitation.
Figure 4Heatmap analysis of the differential metabolites between the control and PSF treated S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots in positive (A) and negative (B) ion model of UHPLC-HRMS (axis of abscissas indicates the differential metabolites, axis of ordinates indicates the serial number of sample; red indicates high concentration levels of metabolites, yellow and black indicate medium concentration levels of metabolites, green indicates low concentration levels of metabolites).
The list of identified differential metabolites and their characteristic fragment ions.
| NO. | RT(min) | mz | Ion | Formula | Identification | Fragments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| 1 △ | 9.88 | 313.143 | [M + H]+ | C19H20O4 | 1β-Hydroxycryptotanshinone | 313.1432, 295.1315, 277.1233, 267.1360, 253.1219, 249.1264, 225.0903, 209.0952, 183.0796, 165.0690, 141.0688 |
| 2 ● | 11.74 | 295.098 | [M − H]− | C18H16O4 | Danshenxinkun A/Przewaquinone C | 295.0985, 279.0658, 267.1064, 249.0924, 237.0926, 222.0690, 209.0628, 183.0086, 165.0712, 148.4306 |
| 3 △ | 11.80 | 341.138 | [M + H]+ | C20H20O5 | Trijuganone C | 341.1380, 281.1165, 263.1069, 253.1197, 235.1113, 220.0881, 207.1166, 192.0923, 179.0850, 169.0639, 153.0697, 145.1000, 135.1176, 124.0449, 107.0836 |
| 4 △ | 12.47 | 343.155 | [M − H]− | C19H22O3 | 1-R-Hydroxymiltione | 343.1603, 299.1671, 284.1423, 256.1112, 243.1040, 228.0799, 216.0804, 199.0765, 186.0690, 173.0253, 160.0522, 127.6810, 106.5153 |
| 5 * | 12.55 | 279.101 | [M + H]+ | C18H14O3 | Dihydrotanshinone I | 279.1020, 261.0910, 251.1060, 233.0960, 218.0730, 209.0960, 205.1010, 190.0770, 169.0650 |
| 6 △ | 12.91 | 281.117 | [M + H]+ | C18H16O3 | Tetrahydrotanshinone 1 | 281.1172, 263.1067, 248.0825, 235.1106, 220.0880, 207.1165, 192.0931, 179.0850, 169.0645, 153.0701, 141.0698, 115.0554 |
| 7 * | 13.78 | 277.086 | [M + H]+ | C18H12O3 | Tanshinone I | 277.0860, 262.0620, 249.0910, 234.0670, 221.0960, 203.0850, 193.1010, 178.0770, 169.0650 |
| 8 * | 13.81 | 297.148 | [M + H]+ | C19H20O3 | Cryptotanshinone | 297.1490, 282.1250, 279.1380, 268.1090, 254.0940, 251.1430, 236.1187, 221.0954, 209.0958, 193.1014, 181.1004, 165.0698, 143.0495 |
| 9 * | 15.10 | 295.133 | [M + H]+ | C19H18O3 | Tanshinone IIA | 295.1330, 280.1090, 277.1230, 266.0940, 262.0990, 252.0780, 249.1270, 235.0750, 221.1320, 207.0810 |
| 10 △ | 15.45 | 283.169 | [M + H]+ | C19H22O2 | Miltirone | 283.1710, 268.1492, 253.1211, 240.1145, 225.0914, 207.0813, 195.1163, 180.0922, 165.0698, 153.0711, 139.0041 |
|
| ||||||
| 11 * | 4.07 | 197.045 | [M − H]− | C9H10O5 | Danshensu | 197.0463, 179.0353, 135.0453, 123.0452, 109.0292, 89.0402, 72.9930, 67.0192, 53.0392 |
| 12 * | 5.61 | 179.035 | [M − H]− | C9H8O4 | Caffeic acid | 179.0353, 135.0445, 117.0340, 108.0218, 89.0398, 79.0556, 65.0038 |
| 13 * | 7.34 | 359.078 | [M − H]− | C18H16O8 | Rosmarinic acid | 359.0780, 197.0460, 179.0350, 161.0240, 135.0450, 72.9930 |
| 14 * | 7.78 | 717.147 | [M − H]− | C36H30O16 | Salvianolic acid B | 717.1480,519.0950,321.0420 |
| 15 △ | 8.21 | 717.147 | [M − H]− | C36H30O16 | Salvianolic acid E | 717.1480, 519.0950, 339.0530, 321.0420 |
| 16 △ | 9.24 | 315.086 | [M + H]+ | C17H14O6 | Salvianolic acid F | 163.0390, 145.0285, 135.0440, 117.0335, 107.0493, 89.0387 |
|
| ||||||
| 17 | 0.70 | 147.076 | [M + H]+ | C5H10N2O3 | Glutamine | 147.0766, 130.0501, 102.0551, 84.0449, 56.0496 |
| 18 | 2.50 | 116.071 | [M + H]+ | C5H9NO4 | Proline | 116.0707, 99.0437, 84.0442, 71.0494, 56.0494 |
| 19 # | 3.54 | 166.086 | [M + H]+ | C9H11NO2 | Phenylalanine | 166.0861, 149.0601, 131.0486, 120.0807, 103.0540, 84.9599, 79.0530 |
| 20 # | 4.71 | 205.097 | [M + H]+ | C11H12N2O2 | Tryptophan | 205.0966, 188.0700, 159.0917, 146.0599, 132.0805, 118.0650 |
| 4.71 | 203.082 | [M − H]− | 203.0382, 186.0552, 159.0930, 142.0665, 116.0510, 74.0253 | |||
|
| ||||||
| 21 # | 0.71 | 195.051 | [M − H]− | C6H12O7 | Gluconic acid | 195.0512, 177.0394, 159.0294, 129.0194, 99.0288, 75.0092, 59.0139 |
| 22 # | 0.92 | 101.025 | [M − H]− | C4H6O3 | 3-methyl pyruvic acid | 101.0248, 83.0138, 73.0286, 57.0351 |
| 23 # | 0.96 | 133.014 | [M − H]− | C4H6O5 | Malic acid | 133.0143, 115.0039, 89.0249, 71.0142, 59.0144 |
| 24 # | 1.42 | 117.019 | [M − H]− | C4H6O4 | Methylmalonic acid | 117.0193, 99.0089, 73.0302, 55.019 |
| 25 # | 4.09 | 143.034 | [M + Na]+ | C6H6O4 | cis, cis-Muconic acid | 143.0341, 126.0342, 113.0291, 97.9684, 69.0337, 55.0181 |
| 26 | 5.17 | 239.056 | [M + FA − H]− | C10H10O4 | Ferulic acid | 197.0457, 179.035, 135.0452 |
|
| ||||||
| 27 | 0.69 | 219.026 | [M + Na]+ | C9H8O5 | 3-(3,4-Dihydroxyphenyl)pyruvate | 219.1202, 202.0934, 174.098, 156.0889, 130.0724, 104.0946, 84.0695 |
| 28 # | 0.72 | 265.111 | [M + H]+ | C12H16N4OS | Thiamine | 265.1114, 248.1132, 144.0479, 122.0716 |
| 29 | 3.57 | 306.100 | [M + H]+ | C12H19NO6S | 3-O-Methylisoproterenol Sulfate | 306.0955, 186.0577, 144.0476, 126.037, 113.0291, 99.0261, 85.0284, 69.03367 |
| 30 ● | 5.14 | 175.061 | [M + FA − H]− | C6H10O3 | 3-hydroxy-2-methylglutarate/ Mevalonolactone | 175.0612, 157.0512, 131.0721, 115.0403, 85.0664, 59.0148 |
| 31 | 7.90 | 475.196 | [M + Na]+ | C20H38O7P2 | Dihydrogeranylgeranyl diphosphate | 475.1922, 393.2455, 342.2300, 297.1884, 164.1471, 209.1525, 181.0498, 163.0377, 135.1163, 107.0857, 93.0700, 85.0286, 71.0491, 57.0698 |
| 32 | 10.45 | 318.300 | [M + H]+ | C18H39NO3 | Phytosphingosine | 318.3003, 300.2896, 256.2629, 212.2368, 146.1174, 132.1017, 102.0917, 88.0753, 70.0652, 57.0702 |
| 33 ● | 11.26 | 347.185 | [M + H]+ | C20H26O5 | Gibberellin A44/24/37/64 | 347.1850, 329.1753, 301.1793, 283.1688, 233.0808, 187.0736, 169.0630, 163.0761, 141.0692, 121.1000, 95.0854, 55.0540 |
* indicates that the metabolite is identified by compared with the reference and the MS/MS spectra of these metabolites are shown in Supplementary Materials Figure S1. # indicates that the metabolite is identified by compared with the network databases. ● indicates that the metabolite is identified as one of the isomers basing on the mass data.
Figure 5The relative quantification of the identified differential metabolites (A) tanshinones; (B) phenolic acids; (C) amino acids; (D) organic acids; and (E) other compounds, between the control (black solid lines) and PSF-treated (red dotted lines) S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots at different time points post-elicitation.
Figure 6Changes of metabolites associated with tanshinones biosynthesis in S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots with PSF treatment. The circles associated with the metabolites indicate whether the metabolite was up-regulation (red), down-regulation (green), or no differences (black) and the numbers above the circles mean the days after PSF treatment.