| Literature DB >> 31569753 |
Fangting Wang1, Changsheng Huang2, Zhihua Chen3, Ke Bao4.
Abstract
Background: Cadmium (Cd) pollution poses a threat to human health. Examination of the spatial distribution of Cd in soils can be used to assess the risks posed to humans and the environment. Objective: This study determined the enrichment rules and factors influencing Cd pollution in Nansha, and evaluated the pollution characteristics and bioavailability of Cd in quaternary sediments through 7 deep soil profiles (0-200 cm), 4 boreholes, and 348 topsoil (0-20 cm) samples.Entities:
Keywords: cadmium bioavailability; ecological risk assessment; heavy metal; spatial distribution
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31569753 PMCID: PMC6801859 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16193637
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Topsoil sampling sites in Nansha District (Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China).
Sequential extraction methods for Cd in different depth soils from the study area.
| Step | Fractions | Extract Composition | pH | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Water soluble | 25 mL ultrapure water | pH = 8.0 ± 0.2 | 30 min ultrasound (40 KHz, 25 ± 5 °C), rinse with ultrapure H2O. |
| F2 | Exchangeable | 25 mL 1.0 mol/L MgCl2·6H2O | pH = 7.0 ± 0.2 | 30 min ultrasound (40 KHz, 25 ± 5 °C), rinse with ultrapure H2O. |
| F3 | Carbonate-bound | 25 mL 1.0 mol/L CH3COONa·3H2O | pH = 5.0 ± 0.2 | 60 min ultrasound (40 KHz, 25 ± 5 °C), rinse with ultrapure H2O. |
| F4 | Humic-acid-bound | 50 mL 0.1 mol/L Na4PO7·10H2O | pH = 10.0 ± 0.2 | 40 min ultrasound (40 KHz, 25 ± 5 °C), rinse with ultrapure H2O. |
| F5 | Fe–Mn-oxide-bound | 50 mL 0.25 mol/L HONH3Cl–HCl | 1 h ultrasound (40 KHz, 25 ± 5 °C), rinse with ultrapure H2O. | |
| F6 | Refractory-organic-matter-bound | 3 mL HNO3 + 5 mL 30% H2O2 | pH = 2.0 ± 0.2 | 1.5 h bath (83 °C, stirred every 10 min), another 1.0 h bath with 3 mL 30% H2O2 (83 °C, stirred every 10 min), rinse with ultrapure H2O. |
| F7 | Residual | 5 mL mixture of 37% HCl, 70% HClO4, and 70% HNO3 (1:1:1)/5 mL 40% HF | Digested at 105 °C for 3 h. |
Figure 2Comparisons between Cd, pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and soil organic matter (SOM) for the different depths and soil profiles.
Cadmium contents in the different cores.
| Boring Number | Number of Samples | MIN 1 | MAX 2 | AVG 3 | MID 4 | SD 5 | CV 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unit: μg/Kg | |||||||
| NSGC27 | 24 | 55 | 388 | 209 | 160 | 126 | 0.601 |
| NSGC05 | 7 | 28 | 560 | 273 | 305 | 170 | 0.624 |
| NSGC11 | 23 | 54 | 664 | 299 | 286 | 167 | 0.577 |
| NSGC39 | 21 | 29 | 573 | 238 | 165 | 148 | 0.625 |
1 Minimum value, 2 Maximum value, 3 Average value, 4 Mid-value, 5 Standard deviation, 6 Coefficient of variation.
Figure 3Cd, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and soil organic matter (SOM) distribution in the cores.
Figure 4Contour map of pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and soil organic matter (SOM).
Descriptive statistics of pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and soil organic matter (SOM) in different soil types (n = 348).
| Coastal sand (n = 4) | Fluvo-aquic soil (n = 47) | Red soil (n = 27) | |||||||
| pH | CEC | SOM | pH | CEC | SOM | pH | CEC | SOM | |
| MAX 1 | 8.30 | 5.52 | 4.05 | 8.28 | 19.65 | 12.17 | 8.43 | 13.81 | 6.87 |
| MIN 2 | 6.88 | 3.13 | 0.20 | 4.60 | 2.83 | 0.43 | 4.05 | 4.10 | 0.53 |
| AVG 3 | 7.59 | 4.51 | 1.82 | 6.76 | 14.29 | 2.46 | 5.89 | 7.06 | 2.62 |
| MID 4 | 7.59 | 4.69 | 1.51 | 6.92 | 16.22 | 2.19 | 5.44 | 6.63 | 2.45 |
| SD 5 | 0.64 | 0.87 | 1.60 | 1.04 | 4.71 | 1.62 | 1.19 | 2.35 | 1.38 |
| CV 6 | 0.08 | 0.19 | 0.88 | 0.15 | 0.33 | 0.66 | 0.20 | 0.33 | 0.53 |
| Paddy soil (n = 158) | Alluvial soil (n = 32) | Swamp soil (n = 77) | |||||||
| pH | CEC | SOM | pH | CEC | SOM | pH | CEC | SOM | |
| MAX 1 | 8.13 | 27.54 | 3.53 | 8.28 | 20.80 | 7.04 | 8.43 | 19.99 | 5.82 |
| MIN 2 | 4.28 | 7.98 | 0.77 | 4.63 | 4.50 | 0.00 | 5.84 | 5.94 | 0.55 |
| AVG 3 | 6.17 | 17.52 | 1.71 | 7.16 | 9.41 | 2.46 | 7.50 | 13.54 | 1.64 |
| MID 4 | 6.15 | 17.43 | 1.48 | 7.40 | 8.24 | 2.50 | 7.56 | 14.06 | 1.52 |
| SD 5 | 0.98 | 2.89 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 4.10 | 1.31 | 0.37 | 3.31 | 0.79 |
| CV 6 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.33 | 0.14 | 0.44 | 0.53 | 0.05 | 0.24 | 0.49 |
1 Maximum value, 2 Minimum value, 3 Average value, 4 Mid-value, 5 Standard deviation, 6 Coefficient of variation.
Figure 5Soil Cd contour distribution.
Figure 6Box charts for Cd content of the different soil types.
Correlation and significance of cadmium concentration with cation exchange capacity (CEC), pH, and soil organic matter (SOM) in topsoil and four different cores.
| Topsoil | NSGC27 | NSGC05 | NSGC11 | NSGC39 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correlation coefficient | CEC | 0.159 | 0.912 | 0.760 | 0.805 | 0.820 |
| pH | 0.250 | −0.124 | −0.177 | −0.155 | −0.333 | |
| SOM | 0.171 | 0.503 | 0.741 | 0.499 | 0.552 | |
| Sig (single side) | CEC | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| pH | 0.000 | 0.200 | 0.159 | 0.152 | 0.016 | |
| SOM | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
Figure 7Igeo box plots for each element (N = 348).
Figure 8Soil Cd evaluation using the Geological Accumulation Index (left) and the Potential Ecological Risk Index (right) in Nansha District.
Figure 9Percentage of Cd fractionation in each core.
Descriptive statistics of bioavailable and moderately bioavailable Cd in each core.
| Boring Number | Bioavailable Cd | Moderately Bioavailable Cd | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSGC27 | NSGC05 | NSGC11 | NSGC39 | NSGC27 | NSGC05 | NSGC11 | NSGC39 | |
| MAX | 0.127 | 0.202 | 0.370 | 0.220 | 0.242 | 0.336 | 0.277 | 0.308 |
| MIN | 0.012 | 0.004 | 0.013 | 0.010 | 0.039 | 0.022 | 0.038 | 0.029 |
| AVG | 0.051 | 0.062 | 0.077 | 0.060 | 0.117 | 0.128 | 0.137 | 0.123 |
| 0–20 m AVG | 0.056 | 0.084 | 0.104 | 0.063 | 0.146 | 0.165 | 0.157 | 0.154 |
| >30 m AVG | 0.029 | 0.010 | 0.035 | 0.022 | 0.069 | 0.045 | 0.100 | 0.043 |
Figure 10Bioavailability of Cd in each core.
Correlation coefficients for total, bioavailable, and labile Cd in each profile.
| Fractions | NSGC27 | NSGC05 | NSGC11 | NSGC39 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Bioavailable | Labile | Total | Bioavailable | Labile | Total | Bioavailable | Labile | Total | Bioavailable | Labile | |
| Total | 1.00 | 0.780 | 0.893 | 1.00 | 0.773 | 0.891 | 1.00 | 0.679 | 0.898 | 1.00 | 0.787 | 0.977 |
| Bioavailable | 0.780 | 1.00 | 0.916 | 0.773 | 1.00 | 0.920 | 0.679 | 1.00 | 0.908 | 0.787 | 1.00 | 0.885 |
| Labile | 0.893 | 0.916 | 1.00 | 0.891 | 0.920 | 1.00 | 0.898 | 0.908 | 1.00 | 0.977 | 0.885 | 1.00 |
| Water-soluble | −0.064 | 0.266 | 0.030 | 0.555 | 0.876 | 0.696 | 0.345 | 0.877 | 0.635 | 0.390 | 0.674 | 0.478 |
| Exchangeable | 0.827 | 0.917 | 0.928 | 0.782 | 0.999 | 0.928 | 0.841 | 0.892 | 0.962 | 0.790 | 1.00 | 0.887 |
| Carbonate | 0.846 | 0.653 | 0.902 | 0.774 | 0.478 | 0.783 | 0.749 | 0.121 | 0.526 | 0.895 | 0.457 | 0.819 |
| Humic acid | 0.756 | 0.397 | 0.534 | 0.843 | 0.640 | 0.671 | 0.831 | 0.747 | 0.869 | 0.843 | 0.592 | 0.809 |
| Fe–Mn oxide | 0.773 | 0.314 | 0.430 | 0.778 | 0.331 | 0.541 | 0.795 | 0.170 | 0.484 | 0.674 | 0.243 | 0.582 |
| Organic | 0.796 | 0.527 | 0.620 | 0.622 | 0.174 | 0.364 | −0.004 | −0.202 | −0.164 | 0.388 | −0.084 | 0.233 |
| Residual | 0.932 | 0.655 | 0.746 | 0.800 | 0.539 | 0.558 | 0.893 | 0.339 | 0.633 | 0.868 | 0.777 | 0.869 |
% Total and variation coefficients for Cd fractionation in each core.
| Fractionation | % Total (%) | Variation Coefficients (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSGC27 | NSGC05 | NSGC11 | NSGC39 | NSGC27 | NSGC05 | NSGC11 | NSGC39 | |
| Water-soluble | 3.07 | 1.44 | 3.15 | 0.89 | 321.79 | 83.19 | 264.81 | 70.9 |
| Exchangeable | 22.13 | 20.31 | 22.69 | 25.65 | 31.5 | 51.47 | 25.69 | 32.81 |
| Carbonate | 20.43 | 16.17 | 19.86 | 20.95 | 35.29 | 53.01 | 32.56 | 33.04 |
| Humic acid | 18.06 | 13.37 | 11.56 | 12.93 | 42.07 | 47.76 | 35.56 | 44.02 |
| Fe–Mn oxide | 13.01 | 11.86 | 10.22 | 10.82 | 42.07 | 45.07 | 29.66 | 33.37 |
| Organic | 8.83 | 10.2 | 12.3 | 11.39 | 43.99 | 57.61 | 79.45 | 59.94 |
| Residual | 14.46 | 26.66 | 20.22 | 17.36 | 53.79 | 65.73 | 53.56 | 59.92 |
Figure 11Correlation between Cd water solubility and the pH value for each core.