Literature DB >> 31569576

The Incomplete Puzzle of the BCL2 Proteins.

Hector Flores-Romero1, Ana J García-Sáez2.   

Abstract

The proteins of the n class="Gene">BCL2 family are key players in multiple cellular processes, chief amongst them being the regulation of mitochondrial integrity and apoptotic cell death. These proteins establish an intricate interaction network that expands both the cytosol and the surface of organelles to dictate the cell fate. The complexity and unpredictability of the BCL2 interactome resides in the large number of family members and of interaction surfaces, as well as on their different behaviours in solution and in the membrane. Although our current structural knowledge of the BCL2 proteins has been proven therapeutically relevant, the precise structure of membrane-bound complexes and the regulatory effect that membrane lipids exert over these proteins remain key questions in the field. Here, we discuss the complexity of BCL2 interactome, the new insights, and the black matter in the field.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BCL2 proteins; MOMP; apoptosis; cancer therapy; protein membrane interactions

Year:  2019        PMID: 31569576      PMCID: PMC6830314          DOI: 10.3390/cells8101176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cells        ISSN: 2073-4409            Impact factor:   6.600


Perspective in BCL2 Universe

The proteins of the n class="Gene">BCL2 family are the main regulators of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway and constitute a fundamental part of tumorigenic cell dismissal and cancer treatment effectiveness [1,2]. Apoptosis effectors, or BAX-type proteins, are the most effective removers of damaged cells, while their antiapoptotic counterparts, or BCL2-type proteins, inhibit apoptotic cell death and play a role in chemotherapeutic resistance [3,4]. The opposing forces between BAX- and BCL2-type proteins are tuned by the so-called BH3-only proteins, a third subgroup of this family of proteins that promotes apoptosis by activating BAX-type proteins and/or blocking antiapoptotic proteins [5]. The proteins of the n class="Gene">BCL2 family interact with each other by a BH3-into-groove mechanism, where the BH3 domain of one protomer binds to the hydrophobic groove of another protomer, thereby forming homo and heterodimers to control their apoptotic function. Under this premise several models have emerged, with differences in binding affinities amongst subgroups and the relevancy of the membrane environment. These models propose that antiapoptotic proteins repress apoptosis neutralizing either BH3-only activators (direct model, MODE 1) or BAX-type proteins (indirect model, MODE 2) [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. In addition, retrotranslocation or inhibition MODE 0 postulates that BCL2-type proteins inhibit apoptosis by keeping BAX-type proteins inactive through continuous retrotranslocation from the mitochondrial surface into the cytosol [15,16,17,18,19]. These models, however, do not consider an enigmatic property shared by all BCL2-type proteins, which is their ability to promote, rather than inhibit, apoptosis under specific conditions (PRODEATH MODE) [15,20,21,22]. The complex interaction network that orchestrates these proteins’ actions is commonly termed the BCL2 interactome, which constitutes an intricate puzzle yet unresolved (Figure 1).
Figure 1

The BCL2 puzzle. Canonical BAX/BAK activation. Activation of BAX-type proteins at the mitochondrial outer membrane (MOM) by the BH3 only proteins induces their oligomerization, formation of supramolecular structures (lines, arcs and rings) and pore formation with the consequent release of apoptogenic factors. The apoptotic repressors, block this process by either interacting with BH3 only proteins (MODE1) or with BAX-type proteins in the membrane (MODE 2) or translocating them to the cytosol (MODE 0). Non canonical cell death or PRODEATH MODE of BCL2-type proteins. Under cellular stress, BCL2-type proteins can switch their antiapoptotic phenotype, directly eliciting rather than inhibiting membrane permeabilization. PL: phospholipids; grey balls: apoptogenic factors.

There are multiple reasons why, in spite of the pieces of this puzzle being defined long ago, it remains impossible to unequivocally model BCL2-mediated cell fate. First, n class="Gene">BCL2 proteins perform their function, that is, regulating mitochondrial outer membrane (MOM) permeabilization (MOMP) to release apoptogenic factors into the cytosol and therefore induce apoptosis, when targeted to the membrane. The membrane and its constituting lipids affect the pieces of the BCL2 puzzle by modulating the affinities between the different family members [23,24] or by altering their canonical phenotype or function, for example switching their antiapoptotic nature to proapoptotic activity [15]. In addition to the membrane environment, posttranslational modifications have also been shown to modify the affinity and function of the BCL2 family members [13,25,26]. These modifications include phosphorylation, proteolytic cleavage, ubiquitination, and proteosomal degradation [14,25]. Second, despite common consensus on the importance of the BH3:groove in mediating the interaction between proteins, additional non-canonical surfaces exist that regulate the BCL2 interactome (e.g., rear binding site, N-terminal alpha helix 1 and tail anchoring domain) [27,28,29,30,31]. Third, these proteins can assemble into defined supramolecular structures that expand their role in cell death beyond cytochrome c release [32,33]. Indeed, the oligomeric apoptosis effectors BAX and BAK are able to mediate mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) release and an immunological response [34,35,36]. Finally, some of the BCL2 puzzle’s pieces participate in other cellular puzzles, as BCL2 proteins are reported to have many other functions which are not directly related to apoptotic cell death. For example, these proteins elicit critical roles in normal cell physiology related to metabolism, mitophagy, mitochondrial dynamics and energetics, and calcium homeostasis, amongst others [37,38,39,40]. Years of extensive research efforts have shed light on important mechanistic and structural details of the BCL2 family n class="Disease">proteins [41,42,43]. Understanding the atomic structure and interaction network of these proteins has provided fundamental opportunities for the rational design of drugs that specifically target them. These compounds, commonly known as BH3 mimetics, are molecules based on the BH3 domain of BH3-only proteins designed to interact with specific BCL2 family members [44]. BH3 mimetics exhibit enhanced lethal activity in primed cells, which contain high levels of antiapoptotic and proapoptotic effectors [44,45,46]. Chief amongst them is Venetoclax (or ABT-199); based on the BH3 only protein BAD, this compound efficiently neutralizes BCL2, thereby leading to BAX/BAK activation and to MOMP to induce apoptosis [47,48]. Although this drug has been recently approved to treat chronic lymphoid leukaemia (CLL), acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) [47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54], its applicability for cancer treatment is limited and chemotherapy still remains the most frequent alternative [55]. There are many possible explanations for the partial efficiency of BH3 mimetics, including cancer heterogeneity, the lack on specific BH3-mimetics optimized for the different BCL2 members governing cell death resistance in the tumor, and mutations or posttranslational modification in the BCL2 family members that alter their canonical function and structure [45,49,55]. On the other hand, these drugs were designed based on solution studies where the regulatory role of the membrane is neglected. Moreover, some BH3-only proteins like BIMs, a shorter isoform of the BH3-only protein BIM, are reported to kill mainly due to their membrane targeting, rather than due to interaction with the antiapoptotic family members [56]. The exact pattern of interactions comprising the BCL2 interactome and the precise structure of the membrane-bound complexes, particularly considering the MOM environment, remains controversial [14,57,58]. Regarding the proapoptotic effectors n class="Gene">BAX and BAK, there is solid evidence suggesting that their active conformations arrange into toroidal pores of proteo-lipidic nature and tunable size [59,60,61,62]. The structural reorganization driving BAX-type proteins from the inactive to the fully activated conformation at the MOM is considered the “holy grail” of apoptosis research [63]. These events are usually divided into: (i) early activation steps; involving TM dislodgement and N terminal exposure [64,65,66], (ii) BH3 domain exposure, which occurs due to BAX/BAK reorganization in two different parts (dimerization and piercing domains) [5,67,68,69,70], (iii) oligomerization and redistribution into apoptotic foci [33,70,71,72,73] and (iv) pore formation [59,74] (Figure 2). Importantly, these events are regulated, at least partially, by mitochondrial membranes. Although there is literature describing the topology of active BAX/BAK in the membrane [70,71,73], we still fail to understand the contribution of mitochondrial lipids in modulating their activation, oligomerization and formation of supramolecular structures at apoptotic foci during and after MOMP. BAX was recently reported to induce mtDNA release [34,36]. This renders mitochondrial apoptosis an unexpected immunological relevance, which changes the current paradigm and expands the horizons of BCL2-based therapeutics.
Figure 2

BAX/BAK structural organization during their activation process. (a) Protein disposition in solution. BAX is represented with nine cylinders corresponding to its nine α-helixes and based on [41]. (b) BAX/BAK early activation steps: including TM dislodgement and N terminal exposure (depicted in green and cyan respectively). (c) BAX/BAK reorganization in two different parts (dimerization and piercing domains) and BH3 domain exposure (depicted in orange). (d) Oligomerization and pore formation, structural representation of membrane embedded BAX/BAK in the context of toroidal pore (clamp model, based on [70]). One monomer is showed in grey (α1–9) and the other is depicted in dark grey (α1′–9′). The relative orientation of the helices 9 remains unresolved.

Concerning the antiapoptotic members of the BCL2 family, membrane lipid composition can enhance their binding affinity for the proapoptotic members [24,75] or ablate their inhibition capacity and release a hidden pore forming activity [15,20,21,76]. Although the transition of antiapoptotic n class="Gene">BCL2 members to pro-death molecules remains poorly understood, the therapeutic potential of this phenotypic reversion should not be neglected, given that their overexpression is key in promoting resistance to chemotherapy. The membrane permeabilizing activity of BCL2-type proteins has similarities and differences to that of BAX-type proteins. Structurally, the pores formed by BCL2-type proteins are smaller, and do not require canonical BH3:groove interactions for oligomerization and pore opening [15,20,77]. Similarly to BAX-type proteins, the amphipathic alpha helix 5 of some antiapoptotic member has been reported to mediate their membrane-permeabilizing function [15,20]. Mechanistically, stimulation of the phenotypic reversion of BCL2- type proteins is diverse, including changes in pH, caspase and µcalpain cleavage, and membrane lipid composition amongst others [15,76,78,79]. Particularly, the mitochondrion-specific lipid cardiolipin (n class="Gene">CL) has been postulated as a key regulatory element in BCL2 protein activity [15,24]. CL is implicated in many mitochondrial functions such as normal organelle ultrastructure, mitochondrial dynamics, energy metabolism and apoptosis [80,81]. Indeed, different lines of evidence indicate that the net content of CL at the MOM increases during apoptosis [82,83]. Because of its unique structural properties (e.g., two negative charges, a relatively small head group and four acyl chains), CL can form highly-curved inverted hexagonal structures [84,85,86] and laterally segregate into defined nanodomains [87,88]. These elements support the concept that CL potentially creates a unique environment for BCL2 family proteins and promotes mitochondrial membrane alterations that facilitate bilayer structure remodeling, deformation, and ultimately permeabilization. Moreover, the peroxidized isoform of CL (CLox) weakens the interaction of cytochrome c with the MIM, a process that may also contribute to ease MOMP [82,89,90]. Beyond their role in cell death, BCL2 family n class="Disease">proteins participate in several cellular processes, including the regulation of mitochondrial dynamics [91]. New insights into the link between shape and function of mitochondria in health and disease (mitopathology) is beginning to unravel on several fronts [92]. A new connection between mitochondrial dynamics and not only cellular metabolism but also cell fate pathways may emerge from the intersection of BCL2 family proteins and mitochondrial reshaping machinery [91]. In vertebrates, the fundamental protein for mitochondrial fission is a large GTPase termed dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1) [93]. The localization of DRP1 at constriction points to induce membrane fission is not random, but it seems to be mainly associated with MERCS (mitochondria ER contact sites) and to colocalize to apoptotic foci with the proapoptotic effectors BAX/BAK [94,95]. BCL2 proteins have been also related to Mitofusins 1 and 2 (MFN1/2), dynamin-like proteins involved in mitochondrial fusion [96]. Finally, mitochondrial cristae remodeling appears to be a fundamental step for the BAX-induced differential release of apoptotic factors at the apoptotic foci [34,36,97]. OPA1 is a key regulator of mitochondrial cristae remodeling [98], and its function appears to be regulated by the BH3 only protein tBID [99,100,101]. Thus, it is conceivable that BCL2 family proteins can elicit a direct regulatory effect over mitochondrial dynamics with diverse effects on cell death and survival. All in all, it is striking that, after more than 30 years of BCL2 research, it is still unn class="Gene">clear how these proteins behave specially at the membrane and how we could efficiently guide them in death and disease. Although many important mechanistic details have been uncovered during these years, the puzzle remains challenging to complete. However, we should not forget that therapeutic-regulation of apoptosis particularly by modulating the BCL2 interactome has strong therapeutic potential to combat human disease, including cancer and neurodegenerative disorders. Indeed, the design of Venetoclax based on BCL2 knowledge is the best evidence that a treatment targeting apoptotic proteins can get us closer to curing cancer. In spite of this, BCL2 regulation and drug targeting at the mitochondrial membrane remain intangible. Mitochondrial lipids regulate BCL2 proteins, both indirectly by changing the mechanical properties of the membrane, or directly by specifically modulating protein targeting, structure and function. Therefore, the understanding of BCL2 action in the membrane context appears to be compulsory, particularly in the light of two recent activities unveiled by these proteins that occur in the membrane, supramolecular organization into defined structures and mtDNA release [32,33,34,36]. In this context, it remains to be understood if the phenotypically-reverted antiapoptotic proteins share these activities with the proapoptotic effector BAX. On the other hand, function and abundance of BCL2 proteins are influenced by posttranslational modifications. As many of these modifications are governed by enzymes, their modulation could be efficiently achieved using small molecules, a suitable scenario for drug design and therapy. Moreover, there is a growing body of evidence suggesting that BCL2 proteins regulate metabolism and mitochondrial function, which are dysregulated in many disease pathologies [39,92,102]. The role of BCL2 in mitopathology, or mitochondria-related diseases, also provides new therapeutic opportunities [92,102]. Finally, as BCL2 proteins are all highly overexpressed in cancers, they represent prime candidates as antigens for anti-cancer therapy. Importantly, cellular immune responses against the BCL2 family proteins have been reported as common features in cancer patients, highlighting that these proteins are natural targets for the immune system and tumor microenvironment [103,104]. Taken together, comprehensive knowledge of the BCL2 family proteins is a highly reliable option to rationally design specific treatments that can cure on demand, alone or combined, adjusted depending on the specific BCL2 profile of patients. As BCL2 family proteins are reported to mediate many cellular processes in healthy and pathological situations, their targeting holds the potential to be unmatched.
  104 in total

1.  Differential targeting of prosurvival Bcl-2 proteins by their BH3-only ligands allows complementary apoptotic function.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Simon N Willis; Andrew Wei; Brian J Smith; Jamie I Fletcher; Mark G Hinds; Peter M Colman; Catherine L Day; Jerry M Adams; David C S Huang
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2005-02-04       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Bax crystal structures reveal how BH3 domains activate Bax and nucleate its oligomerization to induce apoptosis.

Authors:  Peter E Czabotar; Dana Westphal; Grant Dewson; Stephen Ma; Colin Hockings; W Douglas Fairlie; Erinna F Lee; Shenggen Yao; Adeline Y Robin; Brian J Smith; David C S Huang; Ruth M Kluck; Jerry M Adams; Peter M Colman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Viewing BCL2 and cell death control from an evolutionary perspective.

Authors:  Andreas Strasser; David L Vaux
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 15.828

4.  The MCL1 inhibitor S63845 is tolerable and effective in diverse cancer models.

Authors:  András Kotschy; Zoltán Szlavik; James Murray; James Davidson; Ana Leticia Maragno; Gaëtane Le Toumelin-Braizat; Maïa Chanrion; Gemma L Kelly; Jia-Nan Gong; Donia M Moujalled; Alain Bruno; Márton Csekei; Attila Paczal; Zoltán B Szabo; Szabolcs Sipos; Gábor Radics; Agnes Proszenyak; Balázs Balint; Levente Ondi; Gábor Blasko; Alan Robertson; Allan Surgenor; Pawel Dokurno; Ijen Chen; Natalia Matassova; Julia Smith; Christopher Pedder; Christopher Graham; Aurélie Studeny; Gaëlle Lysiak-Auvity; Anne-Marie Girard; Fabienne Gravé; David Segal; Chris D Riffkin; Giovanna Pomilio; Laura C A Galbraith; Brandon J Aubrey; Margs S Brennan; Marco J Herold; Catherine Chang; Ghislaine Guasconi; Nicolas Cauquil; Fabien Melchiore; Nolwen Guigal-Stephan; Brian Lockhart; Frédéric Colland; John A Hickman; Andrew W Roberts; David C S Huang; Andrew H Wei; Andreas Strasser; Guillaume Lessene; Olivier Geneste
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  BH3 profiling discriminates on-target small molecule BH3 mimetics from putative mimetics.

Authors:  Mariana Villalobos-Ortiz; Jeremy Ryan; Thelma N Mashaka; Joseph T Opferman; Anthony Letai
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 15.828

6.  Targeting BCL2 with Venetoclax in Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Authors:  Andrew W Roberts; Matthew S Davids; John M Pagel; Brad S Kahl; Soham D Puvvada; John F Gerecitano; Thomas J Kipps; Mary Ann Anderson; Jennifer R Brown; Lori Gressick; Shekman Wong; Martin Dunbar; Ming Zhu; Monali B Desai; Elisa Cerri; Sari Heitner Enschede; Rod A Humerickhouse; William G Wierda; John F Seymour
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  OPA1 controls apoptotic cristae remodeling independently from mitochondrial fusion.

Authors:  Christian Frezza; Sara Cipolat; Olga Martins de Brito; Massimo Micaroni; Galina V Beznoussenko; Tomasz Rudka; Davide Bartoli; Roman S Polishuck; Nika N Danial; Bart De Strooper; Luca Scorrano
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Bax assembles into large ring-like structures remodeling the mitochondrial outer membrane in apoptosis.

Authors:  Lena Große; Christian A Wurm; Christian Brüser; Daniel Neumann; Daniel C Jans; Stefan Jakobs
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  BCL-2 family protein BOK is a positive regulator of uridine metabolism in mammals.

Authors:  Rahul Srivastava; Zhipeng Cao; Christina Nedeva; Samara Naim; Daniel Bachmann; Tatiana Rabachini; Lahiru Gangoda; Sanjay Shahi; Jason Glab; Joseph Menassa; Laura Osellame; Tao Nelson; Yuniel Fernandez-Marrero; Fiona Brown; Andrew Wei; Francine Ke; Lorraine O'Reilly; Marcel Doerflinger; Cody Allison; Andrew Kueh; Rob Ramsay; Brian J Smith; Suresh Mathivanan; Thomas Kaufmann; Hamsa Puthalakath
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Mitochondrial inner membrane permeabilisation enables mtDNA release during apoptosis.

Authors:  Joel S Riley; Giovanni Quarato; Catherine Cloix; Jonathan Lopez; Jim O'Prey; Matthew Pearson; James Chapman; Hiromi Sesaki; Leo M Carlin; João F Passos; Ann P Wheeler; Andrew Oberst; Kevin M Ryan; Stephen Wg Tait
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Targeting Mitochondrial Apoptosis to Overcome Treatment Resistance in Cancer.

Authors:  Natalie Yan Li Ngoi; Clarice Choong; Joanne Lee; Gregory Bellot; Andrea Li Ann Wong; Boon Cher Goh; Shazib Pervaiz
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 6.639

2.  Fenofibrate Ameliorates Hepatic Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Mice: Involvements of Apoptosis, Autophagy, and PPAR-α Activation.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Ping Cheng; Weiqi Dai; Jie Ji; Liwei Wu; Jiao Feng; Jianye Wu; Qiang Yu; Jingjing Li; Chuanyong Guo
Journal:  PPAR Res       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 3.  The Mysteries around the BCL-2 Family Member BOK.

Authors:  Raed Shalaby; Hector Flores-Romero; Ana J García-Sáez
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-12-04

4.  Regulation of Apoptosis by the Bcl-2 Family of Proteins: Field on a Brink.

Authors:  Alexey S Ladokhin
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 6.600

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.