Literature DB >> 3156955

How much is an icon worth?

G R Loftus, C A Johnson, A P Shimamura.   

Abstract

We report a new technique for assessing the amount of information extracted from the icon that follows a briefly presented picture. The problem of how to measure such information was formulated in terms of how much physical exposure of a picture an icon is worth. Consider two types of stimulus presentations, each with a base duration of d ms. The first is a d-ms picture followed by an icon, and the second is a d + a-ms picture not followed by an icon. How large does a have to be so that equivalent amounts of information are extracted in the two cases? To answer this question, we showed people pictures and later tested their memory for the pictures. We found that the physical exposure duration needed to reach a particular level of performance was approximately 100 ms longer when an icon was not permitted versus when the icon was permitted. This value was independent of the base duration and the luminance of the picture. Moreover, the same value was obtained using three different kinds of memory test and four different sets of pictures. We conclude that an icon is worth approximately 100 ms of additional physical exposure duration. A reasonable explanation for this robust equivalence between icon and stimulus is that the same encoding processes are responsible for extracting information from the icon and from the physical stimulus. Therefore, any variable that affects these encoding processes must affect extraction of information from the icon and the physical stimulus in an identical manner. This prediction was confirmed for one such variable, picture luminance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3156955     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.11.1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  14 in total

1.  A front end to a theory of picture recognition.

Authors:  G R Loftus; J E McLean
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

2.  Position effects in encoding briefly exposed item matrices: evidence for a reading bias or merely a matter of the selection criterion?

Authors:  Uta Lass; Song Yan; Guopeng Chen; Dietrich Becker; Gerd Lüer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-10-08

3.  Effects of spatially directed attention on visual encoding.

Authors:  M T Reinitz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-05

4.  Persisting arguments about visual persistence: reply to Long.

Authors:  D E Irwin; J M Yeomans
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-03

5.  Evidence for the persistence of visual guidance information.

Authors:  R A Tyrrell; K K Rudolph; B G Eggers; H W Leibowitz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-10

6.  Providing a sensory basis for models of visual information acquisition.

Authors:  G R Loftus; T A Busey; J W Senders
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-10

7.  The varieties of visual persistence: comments on Yeomans and Irwin.

Authors:  G M Long
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-10

8.  Distinguishing among potential mechanisms of singleton suppression.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Direct Evidence for Active Suppression of Salient-but-Irrelevant Sensory Inputs.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Carly J Leonard; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-09-29

10.  Why is it easier to identify someone close than far away?

Authors:  Geoffrey R Loftus; Erin M Harley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.