| Literature DB >> 31569456 |
Krzysztof K Cwalina1, Piotr Rajchowski2, Olga Blaszkiewicz3, Alicja Olejniczak4, Jaroslaw Sadowski5.
Abstract
In this article, the usage of deep learning (DL) in ultra-wideband (UWB) Wireless Body Area Networks (WBANs) is presented. The developed approach, using channel impulse response, allows higher efficiency in identifying the direct visibility conditions between nodes in off-body communication with comparison to the methods described in the literature. The effectiveness of the proposed deep feedforward neural network was checked on the basis of the measurement data for dynamic scenarios in an indoor environment. The obtained results clearly prove the validity of the proposed DL approach in the UWB WBANs and high (over 98.6% for most cases) efficiency for LOS and NLOS conditions classification.Entities:
Keywords: BAN; DWM1000; LOS; NLOS; UWB; WBAN; channel impulse response; deep learning; machine learning
Year: 2019 PMID: 31569456 PMCID: PMC6806233 DOI: 10.3390/s19194229
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Architecture of the proposed Deep Feedforward Neural Network (DFNN).
Results of the classification efficiency.
| Number of Hidden Layers | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | >5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classification efficiency [%] | 98.66 | 98.70 | 98.71 | 98.72 | 98.72 |
Figure 2Two-dimensional plans of the indoor measurement environments: (a) hall, (b) corridor.
Selected parameters of people participating in the measurements.
| Height (m) | Weight (kg) | BMI | Montage |
| Scenario | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W1 | 1.75 | 56 | 18.3 | WS | 1.10 | S1 |
| W2 | 1.68 | 56 | 19.8 | WS | 1.10 | S1 |
| W3 | 1.76 | 74 | 23.9 | WS | 1.10 | S1 |
| M1 | 1.72 | 60 | 20.3 | TO | 1.35 | S2 |
| M2 | 1.75 | 93 | 30.4 | TO | 1.35 | S2 |
| W – Woman, M – Man; BMI – Body Mass Index; WS – Waist; TO – Chest; S – Scenario; | ||||||
Classification effectiveness η results of selected methods for one-person training set.
| W1 | W2 | W3 | M1 | M2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| η (%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SVM | 93.9 | 97.8 | 87.8 | 95.8 | 86.4 | |
| THM | 86.0 | 93.9 | 90.1 | 90.9 | 89.2 |
Figure 3DFNN effectiveness η as a function of the Body Mass Index (BMI) parameter for the one-person training set.
Figure 4Selected methods effectiveness η for two-person training sets.