Literature DB >> 31569274

Randomized controlled trial of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist microdose flare-up versus flare-up among poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Firouzeh Ghaffari1, Nadia Jahangiri1, Tahereh Madani1, Shabnam Khodabakhshi1, Mohammad Chehrazi2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist microdose flare-up and GnRH agonist flare-up protocols among women with poor ovarian reserve undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles.
METHODS: Randomized controlled trial study among 131 women with poor ovarian reserve who underwent ICSI cycles at a single center in Tehran, Iran, between September 2008 and May 2014. Eligible women were randomly assigned to either the microdose flare-up (n=66) or flare-up (n=65) protocol. The primary outcome measure was live birth rate.
RESULTS: Both groups were comparable in cycle cancellation, mean number of dominant follicles, retrieved oocytes, and metaphase II oocytes. Number of stimulation days (P=032) and endometrial thickness (P=0.001) were significantly higher, and gonadotropin dose was non-significantly higher (P=0.075) in the microdose flare-up group than in the flare-up group. No difference in clinical pregnancy, implantation, or abortion rate was observed between the two protocols. Live birth was higher in the microdose flare-up group than in the flare-up group (P=0.036).
CONCLUSION: The microdose flare-up protocol seemed to be superior to the flare-up protocol, but it required a higher dose of gonadotropins and a longer duration of stimulation. Further prospective clinical trials of the microdose flare-up protocol are recommended. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01006954.
© 2019 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Embryo transfer; GnRH agonist flare-up; Gonadotropin-releasing hormone; Infertility; Intracytoplasmic sperm injection; Microdose GnRH agonist flare-up; Poor ovarian response; Randomized controlled trial

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31569274     DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  3 in total

Review 1.  Ovarian stimulation protocols for poor ovarian responders: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Man Di; Xiaohong Wang; Jing Wu; Hongya Yang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Ovarian protection and safety of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist after cervical cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jialing Yuan; Yi Lai; Tao Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-04

Review 3.  The Conundrum of Poor Ovarian Response: From Diagnosis to Treatment.

Authors:  Polina Giannelou; Mara Simopoulou; Sokratis Grigoriadis; Evangelos Makrakis; Adamantia Kontogeorgi; Agni Pantou; Dionysios Galatis; Theodoros Kalampokas; Panagiotis Bakas; Stamatis Bolaris; Konstantinos Pantos; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.