Literature DB >> 31568935

Adolescents' smoking environment under weak tobacco control: A mixed methods study for Portugal.

Teresa Leão1, Anton E Kunst2, Michael Schreuders2, Pirjo Lindfors3, Mirte Ag Kuipers2, Julian Perelman4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Bans on smoking in public places and on sales to minors have been widely implemented across the globe. However, many countries have either adopted non-comprehensive (i.e., partial) bans and/or weakly enforce those bans. Little is known, from the adolescents' perspective, how this affects their smoking-related perceptions and behaviors. We studied the case of Portugal, where bans are partial and/or weakly enforced. We sought to understand how the bans affect adolescents' access to cigarettes from commercial sources, the visibility of smoking in public places, and smoking locations.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used a mixed methods design on data gathered in 2016. Quantitative, cross-sectional surveys were conducted in six schools (n = 2,444) in Coimbra, Portugal. In two of these schools, qualitative data were collected in eight single-sex focus group interviews (n = 42).
RESULTS: Ninety-five percent of the adolescents who tried to buy cigarettes were able to do so from commercial sources, through vending machines, or directly from the vendor. Bans on smoking on school premises and at enclosed public places did not prevent these adolescents from observing smoking outside school gates (84.0%), in cafes and restaurants (97%), or from smoking at cafes, bars, or nightclubs (72.9%). DISCUSSION: Partial and/or weakly enforced policies seem to not prevent adolescents from having access to cigarettes, frequently seeing smoking, and finding ample opportunities to smoke in public places. Adopting and enforcing comprehensive policies are necessary efforts to prevent unfavorable responses and more effectively reduce adolescents' smoking behavior.
Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent; Mixed methods; Smoking; Tobacco control policy

Year:  2019        PMID: 31568935     DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.492


  5 in total

1.  Commentary on Titus et al.: Understanding how smoke-free policies can contribute to smoke-free generations.

Authors:  Anton E Kunst
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 7.256

2.  Change in the Prevalence and Social Patterning of First-and Second-Hand Smoking in PORTUGAL: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study (2005 and 2014).

Authors:  Joana Alves; Rita Filipe; João Machado; Baltazar Nunes; Julian Perelman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  [The association between school tobacco policies and the perceived smoking prevalence of adolescents].

Authors:  Martin Mlinarić; Sebastian Günther; Irene Moor; Kristina Winter; Laura Hoffmann; Matthias Richter
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Intergenerational transmission of parental smoking: when are offspring most vulnerable?

Authors:  J Alves; J Perelman; E Ramos; A E Kunst
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.424

5.  Why staff at European schools abstain from enforcing smoke-free policies on persistent violators.

Authors:  Michael Schreuders; Anu Linnansaari; Pirjo Lindfors; Bas van den Putte; Anton E Kunst
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.483

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.