Literature DB >> 31568900

Quality of Life and Cost Implications of Pseudarthrosis After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and its Subsequent Revision Surgery.

Zach Pennington1, Vikram A Mehta2, Daniel Lubelski1, Charles Elliott3, Jacob A Miller4, Edward C Benzel5, Thomas E Mroz6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: More than 120,000 anterior cervical discectomy and fusions (ACDFs) are performed annually. Pseudarthrosis is a potential delayed adverse event that affects up to 33% of patients. The degree to which this adverse event affects both patient quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes and health care costs is poorly understood.
METHODS: Patients who underwent revision surgery for pseudarthrosis between 2007 and 2012 were identified and matched to controls not experiencing pseudarthrosis in a 1:2 fashion (case/control). Cases and controls were compared regarding total health care costs incurred in the year after the index ACDF and QOL outcomes on the following metrics: EuroQol Five-Dimensions Questionnaire, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and Pain Disability Questionnaire.
RESULTS: Of 738 patients who underwent ACDF, 11 underwent surgery for pseudarthrosis. No differences were noted between cases and controls regarding any of the matched variables. Patients in the pseudarthrosis cohort had poorer postoperative scores on the EuroQol Five-Dimensions Questionnaire mobility, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and quality-adjusted life-year dimensions. In addition, 64% of patients with pseudarthrosis had worsened quality-adjusted life-year scores compared with only 9% of controls (P < 0.01). Patients with pseudarthrosis also had poorer mental health (P < 0.01) and pain disability outcomes (P < 0.01) than did controls. Pseudarthrosis was associated with significant increases in direct costs, direct postoperative costs, and total costs (all P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to characterize the effect of surgical revision for pseudarthrosis on both QOL outcomes and care costs after ACDF. Patients requiring revision experienced significantly poorer QOL outcomes and higher care costs relative to controls.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cervical decompression and fusion; EQ-5D; Patient-reported outcomes; Postoperative complications; Pseudarthrosis; Revision surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31568900     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.09.104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  4 in total

Review 1.  Failure in Cervical Spinal Fusion and Current Management Modalities.

Authors:  Terence Verla; David S Xu; Matthew J Davis; Edward M Reece; Michelle Kelly; Mervin Nunez; Sebastian J Winocour; Alexander E Ropper
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Spine Instrumented Surgery on a Budget-Tools for Lowering Cost Without Changing Outcome.

Authors:  Ilyas Eli; Robert G Whitmore; Zoher Ghogawala
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-04

3.  Is the fusion order of the cranial and caudal levels different in two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical spondylopathy? A retrospective study.

Authors:  Xia-Qing Sheng; Yang Meng; Hao Liu; Bei-Yu Wang; Yi Yang; Xin Rong; Ying Hong
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Autologous Stem Cells in Cervical Spine Fusion.

Authors:  Patrick C Hsieh; Andrew S Chung; Darrel Brodke; Jong-Beom Park; Andrea C Skelly; Erika D Brodt; Ki Chang; Zorica Buser; Hans Joerg Meisel; S Timothy Yoon; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-09-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.