Literature DB >> 31568099

A randomized controlled trial testing a virtual perspective-taking intervention to reduce race and socioeconomic status disparities in pain care.

Adam T Hirsh1, Megan M Miller1, Nicole A Hollingshead2, Tracy Anastas1, Stephanie T Carnell3, Benjamin C Lok3, Chenghao Chu4, Ying Zhang4, Michael E Robinson5, Kurt Kroenke6,7,8, Leslie Ashburn-Nardo1.   

Abstract

We conducted a randomized controlled trial of an individually tailored, virtual perspective-taking intervention to reduce race and socioeconomic status (SES) disparities in providers' pain treatment decisions. Physician residents and fellows (n = 436) were recruited from across the United States for this two-part online study. Providers first completed a bias assessment task in which they made treatment decisions for virtual patients with chronic pain who varied by race (black/white) and SES (low/high). Providers who demonstrated a treatment bias were randomized to the intervention or control group. The intervention consisted of personalized feedback about their bias, real-time dynamic interactions with virtual patients, and videos depicting how pain impacts the patients' lives. Treatment bias was re-assessed 1 week later. Compared with the control group, providers who received the tailored intervention had 85% lower odds of demonstrating a treatment bias against black patients and 76% lower odds of demonstrating a treatment bias against low SES patients at follow-up. Providers who received the intervention for racial bias also showed increased compassion for patients compared with providers in the control condition. Group differences did not emerge for provider comfort in treating patients. Results suggest an online intervention that is tailored to providers according to their individual treatment biases, delivers feedback about these biases, and provides opportunities for increased contact with black and low SES patients, can produce substantial changes in providers' treatment decisions, resulting in more equitable pain care. Future studies should examine how these effects translate to real-world patient care and the optimal timing/dose of the intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31568099      PMCID: PMC6784848          DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   7.926


  65 in total

1.  Using virtual human technology to provide immediate feedback about participants' use of demographic cues and knowledge of their cue use.

Authors:  Laura D Wandner; Janelle E Letzen; Calia A Torres; Benjamin Lok; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 5.820

2.  "We don't carry that"--failure of pharmacies in predominantly nonwhite neighborhoods to stock opioid analgesics.

Authors:  R S Morrison; S Wallenstein; D K Natale; R S Senzel; L L Huang
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-04-06       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Key Ingredients-Target Groups, Methods and Messages, and Evaluation-of Local-Level, Public Interventions to Counter Stigma and Discrimination: A Lived Experience Informed Selective Narrative Literature Review.

Authors:  Laura J Ashton; Sarah E Gordon; Racheal A Reeves
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2017-11-28

4.  Cut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe pain on the visual analogue scale for pain in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Anne M Boonstra; Henrica R Schiphorst Preuper; Gerlof A Balk; Roy E Stewart
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  The impact of neighborhood socioeconomic status and race on the prescribing of opioids in emergency departments throughout the United States.

Authors:  Michael Joynt; Meghan K Train; Brett W Robbins; Jill S Halterman; Enrico Caiola; Robert J Fortuna
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Pain among women: associations with socio-economic and work conditions.

Authors:  Beata Jablonska; Joaquim J F Soares; Orjan Sundin
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 3.931

7.  Factors associated with triptan use in episodic migraine: results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention Study.

Authors:  Min Kyung Chu; Dawn C Buse; Marcelo E Bigal; Daniel Serrano; Richard B Lipton
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.887

8.  The Changing Bases of Segregation in the United States.

Authors:  Douglas S Massey; Jonathan Rothwell; Thurston Domina
Journal:  Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci       Date:  2009-11-01

9.  Socioeconomic and demographic disparities in symptoms of orofacial pain.

Authors:  Joseph L Riley; Gregg H Gilbert; Marc W Heft
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.821

10.  Virtual human technology: patient demographics and healthcare training factors in pain observation and treatment recommendations.

Authors:  Laura D Wandner; Lauren A Stutts; Ashraf F Alqudah; Jason G Craggs; Cindy D Scipio; Adam T Hirsh; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 3.133

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Racial and ethnic differences in the experience and treatment of noncancer pain.

Authors:  Samantha M Meints; Alejandro Cortes; Calia A Morais; Robert R Edwards
Journal:  Pain Manag       Date:  2019-05-29

2.  Patient race and opioid misuse history influence provider risk perceptions for future opioid-related problems.

Authors:  Adam T Hirsh; Tracy M Anastas; Megan M Miller; Patrick D Quinn; Kurt Kroenke
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2020-09

3.  The Unique and Interactive Effects of Patient Race, Patient Socioeconomic Status, and Provider Attitudes on Chronic Pain Care Decisions.

Authors:  Tracy M Anastas; Megan M Miller; Nicole A Hollingshead; Jesse C Stewart; Kevin L Rand; Adam T Hirsh
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2020-10-01

4.  Influence of patient immigrant status on physician trainee diabetes treatment decisions: a virtual patient experimental study.

Authors:  Loretta Hsueh; Adam T Hirsh; Tamika Zapolski; Mary de Groot; Kieren J Mather; Jesse C Stewart
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2021-04-16

Review 5.  Wearable Devices: Current Status and Opportunities in Pain Assessment and Management.

Authors:  Andrew Leroux; Rachael Rzasa-Lynn; Ciprian Crainiceanu; Tushar Sharma
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2021-04-19

6.  Intergroup anxiety in pain care: impact on treatment recommendations made by white providers for black patients.

Authors:  Alexis D Grant; Megan M Miller; Nicole A Hollingshead; Tracy M Anastas; Adam T Hirsh
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 7.926

7.  Discrimination in healthcare as a barrier to care: experiences of socially disadvantaged populations in France from a nationally representative survey.

Authors:  Joshua G Rivenbark; Mathieu Ichou
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  The relationship between patients' income and education and their access to pharmacological chronic pain management: A scoping review.

Authors:  Nicole Atkins; Karim Mukhida
Journal:  Can J Pain       Date:  2022-09-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.