Literature DB >> 31568036

Simulation Training for Operative Vaginal Delivery Among Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents: A Systematic Review.

Katherine H Bligard1, Kim L Lipsey, Omar M Young.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of the literature on the effect of simulation training of operative vaginal delivery on learner technique and knowledge, operator comfort, and patient-centered outcomes. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, The Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception through April 2017. The search criteria used MeSH terms ("simulation training," "high fidelity simulation training," "teaching," "obstetrical extraction," "obstetrical forceps," "vaginal delivery," "clinical competence," and "internship and residency"). METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: A total of 30,813 articles were reviewed for inclusion. Studies detailing operative vaginal delivery simulation using forceps or vacuums and reporting health care provider or patient outcomes were eligible. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND
RESULTS: All studies were independently reviewed by two investigators for inclusion. Only eight articles assessed the effect of simulation on trainee skill and comfort or patient outcomes and were included. Four were pretest-posttest studies, two were cross-sectional studies, one was a case-control study, and one was a cohort study. No randomized trials were identified. Simulation was associated with improved forceps placement accuracy and generated force during extraction, as well as increased operator knowledge and comfort with operative vaginal delivery. Additionally, simulation had no association with forceps failure rates, but there was an association with decreased rates of maternal lacerations and neonatal injury. The quality of the included studies was assessed with the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument, with a median score of 9.75 (range 9.0-13.5), indicating low-to-moderate quality.
CONCLUSION: The available evidence suggests that improved technique, comfort, knowledge, and patient outcomes are associated with operative vaginal delivery simulation, but additional studies are required to further characterize such benefits for both forceps and vacuum. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42018087343.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31568036     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

Review 1.  Instruments for assisted vaginal birth.

Authors:  Ganga L Verma; Jessica J Spalding; Marc D Wilkinson; G Justus Hofmeyr; Valerie Vannevel; Fidelma O'Mahony
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-24

2.  Outcomes of induction versus spontaneous onset of labour at 40 and 41 GW: findings from a prospective database, Sri Lanka.

Authors:  Hemantha Senanayake; Ilaria Mariani; Emanuelle Pessa Valente; Monica Piccoli; Benedetta Armocida; Caterina Businelli; Mohamed Rishard; Benedetta Covi; Marzia Lazzerini
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.105

3.  Development of a Novel, Low-Cost, Low-Fidelity Simulation Model for Pudendal Nerve Block Application.

Authors:  Dhanalakshmi K Thiyagarajan; Catherine Wheatley; Aparna Ramanathan
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2022-04-14

4.  Complete cervical inversion and nearly inappropriate stitching with cesarean section during the second stage of labor: a case report.

Authors:  Jun Zhan; Aiyun Xing; Xi Tan
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  Factors related to the practice of vacuum-assisted birth: findings from provider interviews in Kigoma, Tanzania.

Authors:  Sunday Dominico; Mkambu Kasanga; Nguke Mwakatundu; Paul Chaote; Samantha Lobis; Patricia E Bailey
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Simulation training program for vacuum application to improve technical skills in vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Paolo Mannella; Mario Giordano; Maria Magdalena Montt Guevara; Andrea Giannini; Eleonora Russo; Federica Pancetti; Marta Caretto; Tommaso Simoncini
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Comparison of a practice-based versus theory-based training program for conducting vacuum-assisted deliveries: a randomized-controlled trial.

Authors:  Julian Marschalek; Lorenz Kuessel; Maria Stammler-Safar; Herbert Kiss; Johannes Ott; Heinrich Husslein
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 2.344

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.