Literature DB >> 3156708

Psychologic factors in low-back-pain disability.

J W Frymoyer, J C Rosen, J Clements, M H Pope.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Biomechanical tests, physical examination, spinal radiographs, a modified Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), and a psychologic health inventory derived from the Hopkins Symptom Checklist were applied in 321 randomly selected men, ages 18-55. Each subject was evaluated for prior and current low-back pain (LBP) complaints by use of a modification of the McGill pain questionnaire. Subjects were then categorized as having no LBP (n = 106, 33%), moderate LBP (n = 144, 44.8%), and severe LBP (n = 71, 22.1%). Subjects were further subcategorized as not disabled (defined as equal or less than seven days of work lost in the previous year) and disabled (work loss greater than seven days in the prior year).
RESULTS: cumulative scores of the Hopkins Checklist showed that a mean score for no LBP equaled 2.5 +/- 2.9; moderate LBP was 4.3 +/- 3.2; and severe LBP was 4.6 +/- 3 (p = .0000). The disabled group was significantly different on both MMPI and Hopkins Checklist. The 20 disabled subjects had significant elevations of hypochondriasis (p = .0006) and hysteria (p = .005) when compared with nondisabled subjects with LBP. The mean score for disabled subjects on the Hopkins Checklist was 7.35 +/- 4.49, while the score was 4.17 +/- 3.15 (p = .0001) for the nondisabled subjects with LBP. In the general male population, patients with disabling LBP conditions form a distinctive subgroup comparable to those patients seen in selected LBP clinics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3156708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  14 in total

Review 1.  Aggressive exercise as treatment for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Isaac Cohen; James Rainville
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Prediction of return to work by rehabilitation professionals.

Authors:  C A Velozo; P J Lustman; D M Cole; J A Montag; B Eubanks
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1991-12

3.  Recommendations for management of uncomplicated back pain in the workers' compensation system: a focus on functional restoration.

Authors:  Raymond P Fowler
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2004

Review 4.  Physical ergonomics in low-back pain prevention.

Authors:  T Jones; S Kumar
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2001-12

5.  Psychological profile of females with chronic pelvic pain.

Authors:  P Agarwal; U Khastgir; M S Bhatia; N Bohra; S C Malik
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.759

6.  The role of psychological distress and personality in the incidence of sciatic pain among working men.

Authors:  F Pietri-Taleb; H Riihimäki; E Viikari-Juntura; K Lindström; G B Moneta
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Short-term exercise approaches on menopausal symptoms, psychological health, and quality of life in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Ayşegül Ağıl; Faruk Abıke; Arzu Daşkapan; Rıdvan Alaca; Handan Tüzün
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-08-16

8.  A longitudinal study of back pain and radiological changes in the lumbar spines of middle aged women. I. Clinical findings.

Authors:  D P Symmons; A M van Hemert; J P Vandenbroucke; H A Valkenburg
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Back injury prevention programs: A critical review of the literature.

Authors:  P M King
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1993-09

10.  An identification of low back pain groups using biobehavioral variables.

Authors:  A Iezzi; H E Adams; G S Stokes; R N Pilon; L C Ault
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1992-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.