Literature DB >> 31566857

Real-world direct oral anticoagulant experience in atrial fibrillation: falls risk and low dose anticoagulation are predictive of both bleeding and stroke risk.

Rowena Brook1, Oranut Aswapanyawongse1, Mark Tacey2,3, Tanun Kitipornchai2, Prahlad Ho1,4, Hui Y Lim1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have demonstrated that direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are non-inferior to vitamin K antagonist for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) with comparable safety outcomes; however, real-world Australian data are limited. AIMS: To evaluate local real-world DOAC use focussing on safety, particularly in high-risk patients.
METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of 658 patients commenced or continued on DOAC between September 2013 and September 2016 for non-valvular AF at Northern Hospital, a tertiary hospital in Victoria, Australia was performed.
RESULTS: Factor Xa inhibitors were more commonly prescribed than direct thrombin inhibitors (83.3 vs 16.7%) for AF management. The median patient age was 75 years. The rate of clinically significant bleeding on anticoagulation was 3.13 per 100 person-years (including four deaths) with risk factors including history of bleeding (hazard ratio (HR) 3.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22-10.17), concurrent antiplatelet therapy (HR 2.62, 95% CI: 1.11-6.20) and high falls risk (HR 2.76, 95% CI: 1.26-6.08). Patients on low-dose DOAC had significantly higher bleeding risk compared with those on full dose (5.05 vs 1.82 per 100 person-years). The rate of thrombotic stroke despite anticoagulation was 1.34 per 100 person-years with risk factors including low dose anticoagulation (P = 0.034), high falls risk (P = 0.046) and previous stroke (P = 0.028).
CONCLUSIONS: DOAC use in real-world Australian practice is safe and effective, consistent with international data. Low dose anticoagulation and falls risk are associated with increased bleeding and thrombotic risk demonstrating overlapping risk factors. Careful individualised patient risk assessment is still required as low dose anticoagulation is not without risks.
© 2019 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anticoagulant; atrial fibrillation; frailty; haemorrhage; thrombosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31566857     DOI: 10.1111/imj.14640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Med J        ISSN: 1444-0903            Impact factor:   2.048


  4 in total

1.  Retrospective review of D-dimer testing for venous thrombosis recurrence risk stratification: is this a useful test in the real world?

Authors:  Julie Wang; Mark Tacey; Prahlad Ho
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Factors Associated with Falls During Hospitalization for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Authors:  Marcin Mikos; Błażej Szydło; Ivan Szergyuk; Maria Helena Santos de Oliveira; Michał Kuboń; Grzegorz Juszczyk; Brandon Michael Henry
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-05-27

3.  Anticoagulant Therapy for Frail Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hori; Takahiko Fukuchi; Hitoshi Sugawara
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 1.271

4.  Real-World Comparisons of Low-Dose NOACs versus Standard-Dose NOACs or Warfarin on Efficacy and Safety in Patients with AF: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ze Li; Xiaozhen Wang; Dandan Li; Aiping Wen
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 1.990

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.