| Literature DB >> 31566455 |
Jamie L Larson1, Adam B Rosen, Fernando A Wilson2.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the effect of telehealth interventions to usual care for cancer survivors' quality of life. A comprehensive search of four different databases was conducted. Manuscripts were included if they assessed telehealth interventions and usual care for adult cancer survivors and reported a measure of quality of life. Pooled random effects models were used to calculate overall mean effects for quality of life pre- and post-intervention. Eleven articles fit all systematic review and meta-analysis criteria. Initial analyses indicated that telehealth interventions demonstrated large improvements compared with usual care in quality of life measures (Δ = 0.750, p = 0.007), albeit with substantial heterogeneity. Upon further analysis and outlier removal, telehealth interventions demonstrated significant improvements in quality of life compared with usual care (Δ = 0.141-0.144, p < 0.05). The results of the systematic review with meta-analysis indicate that supplementary interventions through telehealth may have a positive impact on quality of life compared with in-person usual care.Entities:
Keywords: cancer; emotional support; oncology; quality of life; symptom management; telehealth; telepsychiatry
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31566455 DOI: 10.1177/1460458219863604
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Informatics J ISSN: 1460-4582 Impact factor: 2.681