Elizabeth K Dunford1,2, Jennifer M Poti3. 1. Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 2. Food Policy Division, The George Institute for Global Health, PO Box M201 Missenden Rd, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia. 3. Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To simulate the impact that Na reductions in food categories that are the largest contributors to dietary Na intake would have on population Na intake from packaged foods among US adults and children. DESIGN: 24 h Dietary recall data were used. For each store-bought packaged food product reported by participants, we generated sales-weighted Na content at the median and 25th percentile using Nutrition Facts Panel data from 193 195 products purchased by US households. The impact that Na reductions would have on population Na intake, overall and by sociodemographic subgroup, was examined. SETTINGS: US households. PARTICIPANTS: Children aged 2-18 years (n 2948) and adults aged >18 years (n 4878), 2011-2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. RESULTS: Na intake from packaged foods was 1258 (se 21) mg for adults and 1215 (se 35) mg for children. Top-ten packaged food group sources contributed 67 % of Na intake. For adults and children, there was a decrease of 8·7 % (109 mg) and 8·0 % (97 mg), respectively, in Na intake if the top-ten sources reduced Na from the median to the 25th percentile. Although absolute reduction in intake varied between sociodemographic subgroups, significant differences were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that if Na reduction shifted the top-ten packaged food group sources of dietary Na intake from the median to 25th percentile, population Na intake would be reduced by 9 % in US adults and children. These findings will help inform the US government's Na reduction targets, as well as policy makers' understanding of differences in intake of critical sub-populations in the USA.
OBJECTIVE: To simulate the impact that Na reductions in food categories that are the largest contributors to dietary Na intake would have on population Na intake from packaged foods among US adults and children. DESIGN: 24 h Dietary recall data were used. For each store-bought packaged food product reported by participants, we generated sales-weighted Na content at the median and 25th percentile using Nutrition Facts Panel data from 193 195 products purchased by US households. The impact that Na reductions would have on population Na intake, overall and by sociodemographic subgroup, was examined. SETTINGS: US households. PARTICIPANTS: Children aged 2-18 years (n 2948) and adults aged >18 years (n 4878), 2011-2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. RESULTS: Na intake from packaged foods was 1258 (se 21) mg for adults and 1215 (se 35) mg for children. Top-ten packaged food group sources contributed 67 % of Na intake. For adults and children, there was a decrease of 8·7 % (109 mg) and 8·0 % (97 mg), respectively, in Na intake if the top-ten sources reduced Na from the median to the 25th percentile. Although absolute reduction in intake varied between sociodemographic subgroups, significant differences were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that if Na reduction shifted the top-ten packaged food group sources of dietary Na intake from the median to 25th percentile, population Na intake would be reduced by 9 % in US adults and children. These findings will help inform the US government's Na reduction targets, as well as policy makers' understanding of differences in intake of critical sub-populations in the USA.
Entities:
Keywords:
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; Packaged foods; Reformulation; Sodium intake
Authors: Christine J Curtis; Jenifer Clapp; Sarah A Niederman; Shu Wen Ng; Sonia Y Angell Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2016-08-23 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Jennifer M Poti; Emily Yoon; Bridget Hollingsworth; Jessica Ostrowski; Julie Wandell; Donna R Miles; Barry M Popkin Journal: J Food Compost Anal Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 4.556
Authors: Zerleen S Quader; Cathleen Gillespie; Sarah A Sliwa; Jaspreet K C Ahuja; Jinee P Burdg; Alanna Moshfegh; Pamela R Pehrsson; Janelle P Gunn; Kristy Mugavero; Mary E Cogswell Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2016-11-03 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Michael Webb; Saman Fahimi; Gitanjali M Singh; Shahab Khatibzadeh; Renata Micha; John Powles; Dariush Mozaffarian Journal: BMJ Date: 2017-01-10
Authors: Viola Michael; Yee Xing You; Suzana Shahar; Zahara Abdul Manaf; Hasnah Haron; Siti Nurbaya Shahrir; Hazreen Abdul Majid; Yook Chin Chia; Mhairi Karen Brown; Feng J He; Graham A MacGregor Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-07-30 Impact factor: 3.390