| Literature DB >> 31565900 |
So Young Jeung1, Sang June Sohn1, Ju Hyun An1, Hyung Kyu Chae1, Qiang Li1, Mincheol Choi2, Junghee Yoon2, Woo Jin Song3, Hwa Young Youn4.
Abstract
Theophylline acts as a bronchodilator and has an anti-inflammatory effect. In addition, theophylline can be applied in patients where there are concerns regarding the side-effects of corticosteroids. This retrospective case series evaluated theophylline-based therapy in tracheal collapse (TC) canine patients. Forty-seven dogs with TC that received theophylline-based therapy during 2013-2017 were investigated. A fluoroscopic examination was performed to diagnose and grade TC. Theophylline was prescribed (7.5-30 mg/kg PO q12h) and the theophylline serum concentrations were measured. Coughing was assessed using a coughing scoring scale. The mean coughing score decreased after the theophylline-based therapy compared with that observed before treatment. Clinical improvements were observed in 46/47 patients (97.9%). As the intrathoracic TC grading increased, the final theophylline dosage also increased (p value 0.019). The symptom-free period (SFP) with therapy was 189.7 ± 194.45 days (range, 0-720 days) and there was no statistically significant correlation between the SFP and age, sex, or TC grade on fluoroscopy. Although theophylline has generally been used as a third-line treatment, it was used as the main treatment in this study and most patients showed improvements. Dogs have a wider therapeutic index of serum concentrations than humans, and any undesirable effects were easily overcome. With further research, this therapy may prove to be a useful approach, but its safety for long-term use in the treatment of canine TC patients needs to be established.Entities:
Keywords: Trachea collapse; fluoroscopy; small breed dogs; symptom-free period; theophylline
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31565900 PMCID: PMC6769334 DOI: 10.4142/jvs.2019.20.e57
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Sci ISSN: 1229-845X Impact factor: 1.672
Protocol for the cough scoring scale by several variables with tracheal collapse in the present study
| Variables of cough | Score | Clinical characterization | No. of dogs (Total 47 dogs) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-treatment | 2–4 treatment | 2–6 mo treatment | |||
| Duration | 1 | Less than a minute | 34 | 37 | 46 |
| 2 | 1–5 min | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5–10 min | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| 4 | 10–20 min | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 5 | Over 20 min | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 6 | Over an hour | 5 | 2 | 0 | |
| NA | No record | 4 | 3 | 0 | |
| Interval | 1 | Very rare (in weeks) | 1 | 9 | 29 |
| 2 | Only excitement (in days) | 11 | 10 | 8 | |
| 3 | Over 24 h | 3 | 10 | 6 | |
| 4 | Every 8–12 h | 2 | 1 | 0 | |
| 5 | Every 6–8 h | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 6 | Every 4–6 h | 5 | 1 | 0 | |
| 7 | Every 2–4 h | 2 | 3 | 1 | |
| 8 | Every 1–2 h | 14 | 8 | 2 | |
| NA | No record | 8 | 5 | 0 | |
| Intensity | 1 | Soft and weak | 5 | 17 | 38 |
| 2 | Mild | 14 | 14 | 6 | |
| 3 | Moderate, uncomfortable | 8 | 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | Severe and hard to sleep | 19 | 10 | 1 | |
| NA | No record | 1 | 3 | 0 | |
| Total score (Mean ± SD*, range†) | 9.69 ± 4.39, 3–18 | 7.33 ± 4.39, 3–18 | 4.27 ± 2.58, 3–15 | ||
NA, not applicable or not available; SD, standard deviation.
*{(Duration score × the number of dogs) + (Interval score × the number of dogs) + (Intensity score × the number of dogs)}/the total number of dogs; †Total score range: 3 (good)–18 (bad).
Breeds and numbers of patients with tracheal collapse in the present study
| Breeds | No. of dogs (%) |
|---|---|
| Maltese | 14 (29.8) |
| Shih-tzu | 12 (25.5) |
| Yorkshire Terrier | 7 (14.9) |
| Pomeranian | 4 (8.5) |
| Chihuahua | 2 (4.3) |
| Japanese Chin | 2 (4.3) |
| Miniature Pinscher | 2 (4.3) |
| Poodle | 2 (4.3) |
| Cocker Spaniel | 1 (2.1) |
| Mixed breed | 1 (2.1) |
| Total | 47 (100) |
Characteristics of the patients with tracheal collapse in the present study
| Signalments | Value | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (Mean ± SD yr, range) | 11.28 ± 3.14, 1–15 | |
| BW (Mean ± SD kg, range) | 4.51 ± 2.5, 1.41–16 | |
| BCS (Mean ± SD, range) | 5.87 ± 1.15, 4–8 | |
| Sex | ||
| Female (No., %) | 6, 12.8 | |
| Spayed female (No., %) | 15, 32.0 | |
| Male (No., %) | 4, 8.5 | |
| Castrated male (No., %) | 22, 46.8 | |
BW, body weight; BCS, body condition score.
Karnofsky score of the dogs with tracheal collapse in the present study
| Canine Karnofsky score* | No. of dogs (%) |
|---|---|
| 0 | 0 |
| 10 | 0 |
| 20 | 0 |
| 30 | 0 |
| 40 | 0 |
| 50 | 0 |
| 60 | 6 (12.8) |
| 70 | 3 (6.4) |
| 80 | 32 (68.1) |
| 90 | 6 (12.8) |
| 100 | 0 |
| Total | 47 (100) |
*Valladao et al. [23].
Clinical signs of the 47 dogs with tracheal collapse in the present study
| Clinical signs | No. of dogs (%) |
|---|---|
| Cough | 47 (100) |
| Chronic cough* | 30 (63.8) |
| Dyspnea | 5 (10.6) |
| Nasal discharge | 3 (6.4) |
| Syncope | 2 (4.3) |
| Tachypnea | 2 (4.3) |
| Lethargy | 1 (2.1) |
| Cyanosis | 1 (2.1) |
*Cough over 2 months.
Grades of tracheal collapse and lung herniation as fluoroscopic examination in the 47 dogs in the present study
| Region | Grade* | No. of dogs (%) | Mean grade of each region† (Mean ± SD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cervical | 0 | 21 (44.7) | |
| 1 | 1 (2.1) | ||
| 2 | 7 (14.9) | 1.64 ± 1.62 | |
| 3 | 10 (21.3) | ||
| 4 | 8 (17.0) | ||
| Thoracic inlet | 0 | 9 (19.1) | |
| 1 | 3 (6.4) | ||
| 2 | 5 (10.6) | 2.57 ± 1.53 | |
| 3 | 12 (25.5) | ||
| 4 | 18 (38.3) | ||
| Intrathoracic | 0 | 4 (8.5) | |
| 1 | 1 (2.1) | ||
| 2 | 8 (17.0) | 3.02 ± 1.24 | |
| 3 | 11 (23.4) | ||
| 4 | 23 (48.9) | ||
| Carina | 0 | 2 (4.3) | |
| 1 | 0 (0) | ||
| 2 | 6 (12.8) | 3.53 ± 1.02 | |
| 3 | 2 (4.3) | ||
| 4 | 37 (78.7) | ||
| Lung herniation | Presence | 31 (66.0) | |
| Absence | 4 (8.5) | ||
| No record | 12 (25.5) |
SD, standard deviation.
*TC grade 0 represented the normal state; †{(0 × the number of dogs with grade 0 in that region) + (1 × the number of dogs with grade 1 in that region) + (2 × the number of dogs with grade 2 in that region) + (3 × the number of dogs with grade 3 in that region) + (4 × the number of dogs with grade 4 in that region)}/the total number of dogs.
Patients' characteristics after treatment
| Variables | Mean ± SD (range) |
|---|---|
| Symptom-free period (d) | 189.7 ± 194.45 (0–720) |
| Survival time (d) | 1,028.19 ± 551.08 (127–2048) |
| Final dosage of theophylline (mg/kg) | 16.01 ± 4.34 (7.5–22) |
SD, standard deviation.
Side-effects of theophylline-based therapy in the present study
| Side-effects | No. of dogs (%) |
|---|---|
| Diarrhea | 5 (10.6) |
| Dyspnea | 3 (6.4) |
| Tremor | 3 (6.4) |
| Anorexia | 3 (6.4) |
| Vomiting | 2 (4.3) |
| Cough | 2 (4.3) |
| Excitement | 1 (2.1) |
| Nausea | 0 (0) |
| Tachycardia | 0 (0) |
| Insomnia | 0 (0) |
| Total | 14* (29.8) |
*Some subjects had more than one side-effect.
Correlation between the TC grade through a fluoroscopic examination and degree of symptom improvement
| Treatment time points | Coughing variables | Region | Coefficient | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Early stage (2–4 wk treatment) | Duration | Cervical | 0.47 | 0.139 |
| Thoracic inlet | −1.22 | 0.049* | ||
| Intrathoracic | 0.51 | 0.498 | ||
| Carina | −0.01 | 0.994 | ||
| Interval | Cervical | 0.24 | 0.266 | |
| Thoracic inlet | −0.26 | 0.283 | ||
| Intrathoracic | 0.27 | 0.440 | ||
| Carina | −0.35 | 0.353 | ||
| Intensity | Cervical | 0.22 | 0.347 | |
| Thoracic inlet | −0.19 | 0.467 | ||
| Intrathoracic | 0.79 | 0.045* | ||
| Carina | 0.23 | 0.589 | ||
| Stable stage (2–6 mo treatment) | Duration | Cervical | 3.74 | 0.994 |
| Thoracic inlet | −3.01 | 0.987 | ||
| Intrathoracic | 2.73 | 0.993 | ||
| Carina | 4.41 | 0.988 | ||
| Interval | Cervical | −0.22 | 0.329 | |
| Thoracic inlet | −0.35 | 0.244 | ||
| Intrathoracic | 0.46 | 0.224 | ||
| Carina | 0.26 | 0.449 | ||
| Intensity | Cervical | −0.02 | 0.938 | |
| Thoracic inlet | −0.14 | 0.679 | ||
| Intrathoracic | 0.11 | 0.793 | ||
| Carina | 0.45 | 0.272 |
TC, tracheal collapse.
*Statistically significant difference: p value < 0.05.
Correlation between the TC grade through a fluoroscopic examination and the final dosage of theophylline
| Factor | Region | Coefficient | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The final dosage of theophylline | Cervical | −0.51 | 0.302 |
| Thoracic inlet | −0.22 | 0.683 | |
| Intrathoracic | 1.74 | 0.019* | |
| Carina | −0.52 | 0.517 | |
| Lung herniation | −1.51 | 0.419 |
TC, tracheal collapse.
*Statistically significant difference: p value < 0.05.
Mean symptom-free period after theophylline-based therapy according to sex and fluoroscopic characteristics in 33 dogs in the present study
| Factors | Variables for SFP prediction | SFP prediction with factors using linear regression analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient | 95% CI | |||
| Sex | Male | −10.27 | −151.08 to 130.55 | 0.883 |
| Female | Reference† | |||
| Fluoroscopic imaging | TC grade of cervical | 12.71 | −47.04 to 72.46 | 0.664 |
| TC grade of thoracic inlet | 7.00 | −63.68 to 77.69 | 0.839 | |
| TC grade of intrathoracic | −52.46 | −153.58 to 48.65 | 0.294 | |
| TC grade of carina | 61.79 | −55.25 to 178.84 | 0.286 | |
| Lung herniation | 51.21 | −181.18 to 283.59 | 0.653 | |
SFP, symptom-free period; CI, confidence interval; TC, tracheal collapse.
*Statistically significant difference: p value < 0.05 (Therefore, all of the factors had no statistical significance with SFP); †In linear regression analysis, when there is no statistical significance for one variable (ex. male) for the biased variables (ex. male and female), there is no statistical significance for the other variable (ex. female). Therefore, there is no value for the other variable (ex. female).
Mean symptom-free period after theophylline-based therapy according to age in 33 dogs in the present study
| Age (yr) | Mean SFP to age (Mean ± SD day, range, No.*) | SFP prediction with age using linear regression analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < Age | Age ≤ | Coefficient | 95% CI | ||
| 10 | 258.43 ± 284.78, 30–720, n = 7 | 171.15 ± 165.08, 0–510, n = 26 | −87.27 | −255.84 to 81.29 | 0.299 |
| 11 | 237.67 ± 223.79, 30–720, n = 12 | 162.24 ± 175.43, 0–510, n = 21 | −75.43 | −218.59 to 67.74 | 0.291 |
| 12 | 235.13 ± 214.00, 30–720, n = 16 | 146.88 ± 169.34, 0–510, n = 17 | −88.24 | −224.81 to 48.33 | 0.197 |
| 13 | 209 ± 214.91, 0–720, n = 18 | 166.47 ± 171.11, 0–510, n = 15 | −42.53 | −182.53 to 97.46 | 0.540 |
| 14 | 219.81 ± 202.00, 0–720, n = 27 | 54 ± 52.99, 0–144, n = 6 | −165.81 | −337.22 to 5.59 | 0.057 |
CI, confidence interval.
*Number of dogs; †Statistically significant difference: p value < 0.05 (Therefore, age had no statistical significance with SFP).