| Literature DB >> 31565611 |
Matheus F Ballestero1, Ricardo S De Oliveira2.
Abstract
Depressed skull fracture, also referred to as a "ping-pong ball" or "pond" fracture in neonates, is a common sign of traumatic brain injury in paediatric patients. The main causes of depressed skull fractures include labour and obstetric trauma in newborns and direct head trauma in older children. Skull depression rarely resolves spontaneously, and the surgical options include open cranioplasty and percutaneous microscrew elevation, among others. The use of negative pressure as a technique for fracture reduction has been described in a few papers. Here, we present a case-based review along with an illustrative case of depressed skull fracture reduced using the suction cup method via negative pressure. In addition, a Systematic Literature Review was performed to evaluate the safety of applying this procedure. The suction cup method is a feasible method to reduce depressed skull fracture in children, with minimum complications and no apparent long-term impairments.Entities:
Keywords: breast pump; depressed skull fracture; pediatric neurosurgery; traumatic brain injury
Year: 2019 PMID: 31565611 PMCID: PMC6758970 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.5205
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Figure 1Illustrative case – Lateral head photograph showing the depressed skull fracture (black arrow).
Figure 2Illustrative case – Anteroposterior X-ray showing the bone deformity (white arrow).
Figure 3The breast milk extractor showing the vacuum connection (black arrow) and the surface used to create vacuum (green arrow).
Figure 4Illustrative case – Post-reduction anteroposterior X-ray showing no bone deformity (white arrow).
Summary of SCV technique used to reduce skull fracture in children published in the medical literature.
SCV: Suction cup vacuum; CPH: Cephalohematoma; F: Female; FO: Falling object; FT: Frontal; FTTP: Frontotemporal; L: Left; M: Male; NI: No information; PT: Peripartum trauma; R: Right; RTA: Road traffic accident; TP: Temporal.
| Study | Patients | Mean Age (mos) | Gender | Mechanism | Location | Side | Diameter (cm) | Success | Complications | Follow-up (mos) | Long-term impairment |
| Schrager, 1970 [ | 1 | 0 | 100% F | 100% PT | 100% PT | 100% L | 6.0 | 100% | None | 12 | None |
| Van Enk, 1972 [ | 1 | 5.55 | 100% M | 100% Fall | 100% PT | 100% L | 4.5 | 100% | None | 18 | None |
| Saunders et al., 1979 [ | 3 | Neonate | 100% M | 100% PT | 66.7% FT / 33.3% PT | 66.6% L / 33.3% R | 3.5 | 100% | None | NI | NI |
| Paul and Fahner, 1992 [ | 1 | 18 | NI | 100% Trauma | 100% PT | 100% R | NI | 100% | None | NI | None |
| Pollak et al., 1999 [ | 1 | Neonate | NI | 100% PT | 100% Parietal | 100% L | 4 | 100% | None | NI | NI |
| Hung et al., 2005 [ | 14 | 4.5 | 57.1% M / 42.9% F | NI | 50% PT / 28.6% TP / 14.3% FT / 7.1% FTTP | 57.1 R / 42.9 L | 3.8 | 92.9% | None | 24 | None |
| Djientcheu et al., 2006 [ | 8 | 18.4 | 62.5% M / 37.5% F | 37.5% Fall / 25% RTA / 37.5 FO | 100% PT | 50% R / 25% L / 25% NI | NI | 100% | 12.5% CPH | 3 | None |
| Kim et al., 2007 [ | 1 | 3 | 100% M | 100% RTA | 100% PT | 100% R | NI | 100% | None | NI | None |
| Mastrapa et al., 2007 [ | 5 | 1 | 60% M / 40% F | 100% PT | NI | NI | NI | 100% | None | 18 | None |
| Overall | 35 | 6.9 | 62.5% M / 37.5% F | 47.6% PT / 19% Fall / 14.3% FO / 14.3% RTA / 4.8% Other | 70% PT / 13.3% FT/ 13.3% TP / 3.3% FTTP | 42.9% Right / 37.1% Left / 20.0% NI | 4.0 | 97.2% | 2.9% CPH | 16.6 | None |