Literature DB >> 31565464

Two New Species and a New Chinese Record of Hypocreaceae as Evidenced by Morphological and Molecular Data.

Zhao Qing Zeng1, Wen Ying Zhuang1.   

Abstract

To explore species diversity of Hypocreaceae, collections from Guangdong, Hubei, and Tibet of China were examined and two new species and a new Chinese record were discovered. Morphological characteristics and DNA sequence analyses of the ITS, LSU, EF-1α, and RPB2 regions support their placements in Hypocreaceae and the establishments of the new species. Hypomyces hubeiensis sp. nov. is characterized by occurrence on fruitbody of Agaricus sp., concentric rings formed on MEA medium, verticillium-like conidiophores, subulate phialides, rod-shaped to narrowly ellipsoidal conidia, and absence of chlamydospores. Trichoderma subiculoides sp. nov. is distinguished by effuse to confluent rudimentary stromata lacking of a well-developed flank and not changing color in KOH, subcylindrical asci containing eight ascospores that disarticulate into 16 dimorphic part-ascospores, verticillium-like conidiophores, subcylindrical phialides, and subellipsoidal to rod-shaped conidia. Morphological distinctions between the new species and their close relatives are discussed. Hypomyces orthosporus is found for the first time from China.
© 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group on behalf of the Korean Society of Mycology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hypomyces hubeiensis; morphology; phylogeny; Trichoderma subiculoides

Year:  2019        PMID: 31565464      PMCID: PMC6758621          DOI: 10.1080/12298093.2019.1641062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mycobiology        ISSN: 1229-8093            Impact factor:   1.858


Introduction

The family Hypocreaceae typified by Hypocrea Fr. was established by Saccardo [1] and was redefined by Rossman et al. [2] who treated it in a narrow sense and recognized 12 genera. Approximate 17 genera are currently accepted [3-6], including Hypomyces (Fr.) Tul. & C. Tul and Trichoderma Pers., two major genera encompassing the majority of species of the family. The phylogenetic relationship among genera of the group was first revealed by Spatafora and Blackwell [7]. This study is focused on two major genera of the family. For a long time, many fungicolous fungi with light- or bright-colored perithecia produced within subiculum were described as Hypomyces which is typified by H. lactifluorum (Schwein.) Tul. & C. Tul. Morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analysis based on sequence of nuclear ribosomal large subunit (LSU) rDNA in the previous work indicated that the genus is not a monophyletic group [8-11]. After the comprehensive studies by Rogerson and Samuels [12-15] and Põldmaa and collaborators [11,16-22], the generic concept of Hypomyces became clear. Among the 212 names listed in Index Fungorum database, about 77 species are commonly accepted [11,23-29]. Twenty-seven of them have been known from China [27,29-31]. Members of the genus are mainly distributed in temperate and tropical regions and economically important in biomedicine and agriculture [32,33]. Host specificity, color of subicula and perithecia, shape, size, septation, surface ornamentation, and apiculus of ascospores, and type of asexual states are main characters used for identifications of Hypomyces species. The genus grows on Agaricales, Boletales, Helotiales, and Pezizales are highly host-specific, while those occurring on Polyporales may have a slightly wider host range [2,12-16]. For example, H. lithuanicus Heinr.-Norm. lives only on Lactariustor minosus (Schaeff.) Gray, H. hyalinus (Schwein.) Tul. & C. Tul. is restricted to Amanita Adans, and H. melanocarpus Rogerson & Mazzeris is on Tylopilus P. Karst. However, H. australis (Mont.) Höhn., H. rosellus (Alb. & Schwein.) Tul. & C. Tul. and H. tegillum Berk. & M.A. Curtis show the least specialized parasites and even being found on non-fungus substrates, like rotten bark and wood [14]. Trichoderma, the largest genus in the family Hypocreaceae, was originally established by Persoon [34] and typified with T. viride Pers. Since then, number of Trichoderma species increased dramatically. Bissett et al. [35] provided a list of 254 Trichoderma species with DNA sequences or living cultures available. There are more than 340 species currently recognized in the genus. They occur on rotten wood, bark and leaves, fruitbodies of other fungi, in soil, or within healthy plant tissues as endophytes [36-39]. They are renewable natural resources and play important roles in production of industrial enzymes and antibiotics [40], biological control of soil-borne plant pathogens [41,42], plant growth promotion [43], induction of plant resistance [44], production of bioactive secondary metabolites [36] and remediation of soil contaminated by heavy metals [45]. Taxonomy of Trichoderma species is mainly based on anatomy of stromata and perithecia, color, shape, size of ascospores, conidia and chlamydospores, type of conidiophores, colony morphology and growth rate, and DNA sequence data [46,47]. The phylogenetic analyses based on translation elongation factor 1-α encoding (EF-1α) and RNA polymerase II subunit 2 (RPB2) regions indicated that the hyaline ascospored species are divided into 11 clades and those of green ones are separated into 7 clades [48-50]. During our survey of hypocrealean species on fungi and plant debris in China, two undescribed taxa are found based on morphological characteristics and DNA sequence analyses of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS), LSU, EF-1α, and RPB2. Differences between the new species and their close relatives are discussed. Hypomyces orthosporus is reported for the first time from China.

Materials and methods

Collections and morphological study

Specimens were collected from Shennongjia Forestry District of Hubei and Chebaling National Nature Reserve of Guangdong and Mainling of Tibet, and deposited in the Herbarium Mycologicum Academiae Sinicae (HMAS). Cultures are kept in the State Key Laboratory of Mycology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Methods used by Jaklitsch [46] and Põldmaa [19] were followed. Test for color change of perithecial wall was made with 3% potassium hydroxide (KOH). To observe anatomic structures of perithecia, longitudinal sections of ascomata were made with a freezing microtome (YD-1508-III; Jinhua Yidi Medical Appliance Co., Jinhua, China) at a thickness of 6–8 µm. Microscopic examinations and measurements were taken from the sections and squash mounts in lactophenol cotton blue solution using an Olympus BH-2 microscope (Tokyo, Japan). Photographs were taken with a Leica DFC450 digital camera (Leica Camera, Wetzlar, Germany) attached to a Leica M125 stereomicroscope (Leica) for gross morphology and a Zeiss AxioCamMRc 5 digital camera (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) attached to a Zeiss Axio Imager A2 microscope (Carl Zeiss) for anatomic structures. Measurements of individual structures were based on 30 units, except when otherwise noted. Cultures were obtained from conidia on subiculum or from fresh ascomata using single ascospore isolation. To determine colony features and growth rates, strains were grown on cornmeal dextrose agar (CMD; Yuanye Bio-Technology Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China), malt extract agar (MEA; Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK), potato dextrose agar (PDA; HuiXing Biochemistry Reagent Ltd Co., Shanghai, China) and synthetic nutrient-poor agar (SNA) [51] in 90 mm plastic Petri dishes at 25 °C for 7 or 14 d. For observation of conidiophores and microconidia, cultures were grown on SNA at 25 °C with alternating periods of light and darkness (12 h/12 h).

DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing

The genomic DNA was extracted from fresh mycelium following the methods of Wang and Zhuang [52]. Primer pairs, ITS5/ITS4 [53], LR0R/LR5 [9, 54], and EF1-728F/EF1567R [55,56] were used to amplify the sequences of ITS, LSU, and EF-1α regions for Hypomyces species, while EF1-728F/TEF1LLErev [55,57] and fRPB2-5F/fRPB2-7cR [58] were applied to amplify the sequences of EF-1α and RPB2 regions for Trichoderma species. PCR reactions were performed on an ABI 2720 Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosciences, Foster City, CA) with a 25 µl reaction system consisting of 12.5 µl Taq MasterMix, 1 µl each primer (10 µM), 1 µl template DNA and 9.5 µl ddH2O, based on the procedures detailed in White et al. [53], Chaverri and Samuels [59], Rehner and Buckley [56], and Liu et al. [58]. DNA sequencing was carried out in both directions on an ABI 3730XL DNA Sequencer (Applied Biosciences).

Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analyses

Newly generated sequences and those retrieved from GenBank are listed in Table 1 (Hypomyces) and Table 2 (Trichoderma). Nectria eustromatica Jaklitsch & Voglmayr and Thyronectria berolinensis (Sacc.) Seaver were used as outgroup taxa. Sequences were assembled, aligned, and the primer sequences were trimmed with BioEdit version 7.0.5 (Ibis Biosciences, Carlsbad, CA) [60] and converted to NEXUS files by ClustalX version 1.83 (EMBL, Heidelberg, Germany) [61]. Sequences were first subjected to the BLAST searches to determine preliminarily their taxonomic positions. TrichOKEY [62] was also applied to preliminary identification of Trichoderma. Due to a low number of variable sites and long insertions in certain species of Trichoderma [63], ITS sequences were not incorporated into phylogenetic analyses. The partition homogeneity test of ITS, LSU, and EF-1α sequences of Hypomyces, EF-1α and RPB2 sequences of Trichoderma were performed with PAUP version 4.0b10 (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA) [64]. To confirm the phylogenetic positions of the new species, sequences of these regions were combined and analyzed with maximum parsimony (MP) and maximum likelihood (ML) methods. The MP analysis was performed with PAUP version 4.0b10 [64] using 1000 replicates of heuristic search with random addition of sequences and subsequent TBR (tree bisection and reconnection) branch swapping. Topological confidence of resulted trees was tested by maximum parsimony bootstrap proportion (MPBP) with 1000 replications, each with 10 replicates of random addition of taxa. Four Markov chains were run simultaneously for 1,000,000 generations with the trees sampled every 100 generations. A 50% majority rule consensus tree was computed after excluding the first 2500 trees as “burn-in.” The ML analysis was conducted with IQ-Tree version 1.6.10 (University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria) [65] using the best model for each locus chose by ModelFinder [66]. Branch support measures were calculated with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Trees were examined via TreeView version 1.6.6 (University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK) [67]. Maximum likelihood bootstrap (MLBP) and MPBP greater than 50% are shown at the nodes.
Table 1.

List of Hypomyces species, herbarium/strain numbers and GenBank accession numbers of materials used in this study.

SpeciesHerbarium/strain numbersGenBank accession numbers
ITSLSUEF-1α
Hypomyces aconidialisTFC 201215FN859456FN859456FN868774
Hypomyces albidusCBS 46071MH860220MH871987
Hypomyces armeniacusTFC 02862FN859424FN859424FN868742
Hypomyces aurantiusTFC 95171FN859425FN859425FN868743
Hypomyces australasiaticusTTFC 038NR121428FN859428FN868746
Hypomyces australisTFC 0718AM779860AM779860FN868747
Hypomyces chlorinigenusKSH 511KT946843AF213027KU041505
Hypomyces completusKSH 411KT946842AF213028KU041504
Hypomyces corticiicolaCBS 13771MH860037MH871817
Hypomyces dactylarioidesTCBS 14178NR111430MH872879FN868748
Hypomyces ellipsosporusTCBS 69686NR_155168
Hypomyces gabonensisTTFC 201156NR121429FN859430FN868749
Hypomyces hubeiensisTHMAS 254597MK478467aMN044762MK484608
Hypomyces khaoyaiensisGJS 01304FN859431AJ583483FN868750
Hypomyces lactifluorumTAAM 170476FN859432EU710768FN868751
Hypomyces laeticolorTJCM 10758NR_155202NG_059815
Hypomyces luteovirensCBS 128483MH864958MH876402
Hypomyces mycophilusCBS 17556MH857567MH869110
Hypomyces odoratusGAm 329FN859434FN859434FN868753
Hypomyces orthosporusTFC 97130AF160241
 HMAS 279649MK478468MN044763MK484609
Hypomyces peltigericolaTCBS 141848NR_148180
Hypomyces pseudocorticiicolaTJCM 12654NR_155203NG_059820
Hypomyces robledoiTTFC200717NR_145022AM779859
Hypomyces rosellusTFC 201071FN859443FN859443FN868762
Hypomyces samuelsiiTFC 2007-23FN859451FN859451FN868769
Hypomyces semicircularisTCBS 70588NR_121425MH873843FN868735
Hypomyces semitranslucensCBS 82170/TFC 0323MH859960AJ459303
Hypomyces sibirinaeCBS 74488MH862151AJ459304
Hypomyces sinicusTHMAS 251317NR156252MN044986MK484610
Hypomyces stephanomatisCBS 44664/GJS 8850MH858481AF160243AF534632
Hypomyces subglobosusTCBS 54386NR_155169
Hypomyces subiculosusTFC 97166FN859452AJ459309FN868770
Hypomyces tremellicolaCBS 44165/TFC 9750KU382166U17427
Hypomyces tubariicolaTCBS 11579NR_158483MH872953
Hypomyces virescensGAi 1906FN859454FN859454FN868772
Hypomyces xyloboliTCBS 110280NR_160212AJ459299
Nectria eustromaticaTCBS 121896NR137579HM534896HM534875
Thyronectria berolinensisCBS 127382MH864554MH875990HM534872

Numbers in bold indicate the newly provided sequences.

Species labeled as T indicate the sequences from ex-type strains.

Table 2.

List of Hypocreaceae species, herbarium/strain numbers and GenBank accession numbers of materials used in this study.

SpeciesHerbarium/strain numbersGenBank accession numbers
EF-1αRPB2
Arachnocrea scabridaBEO 0201DQ834457DQ834458
Arachnocrea stipataTFC 9743EU710770
Hypomyces lactifluorumTAAM 170476FN868751EU710773
Hypomyces rosellusTFC 201071FN868762FN868697
Hypomyces samuelsiiTFC 200723FN868769FN868705
Nectria eustromaticaTCBS 121896HM534875HM534886
Protocrea farinosaTCBS 121551EU703889EU703935
Protocrea illinoensisTTFC 9698EU703905EU703952
Protocrea pallidaTCBS 29978EU703900EU703948
Thyronectria berolinensisCBS 127382HM534872HM534883
Trichoderma aggressivumTDAOM 222156AF348098FJ442752
Trichoderma alutaceumTCBS 120535FJ179567FJ179600
Trichoderma asterineumTHMAS 271353KT224465KT224469
Trichoderma brevicompactumTRS 859KP008906KP009162
Trichoderma ceramicumTCBS 114576FJ860628FJ860531
Trichoderma confluensTHMAS 244993KT001959KT001964
Trichoderma danicumTCBS 121273FJ860634FJ860534
Trichoderma chlorosporumTGJS 981AY391968AY391906
Trichoderma deliquescensGJS 89129AF534581AF545517
Trichoderma estonicumGJS 96129AF534604AF545514
Trichoderma foliicolaTHypo 645JQ685862JQ685876
Trichoderma hainanenseTHMAS 248837KY688033KY687976
Trichoderma henanenseTHMAS 252889KT224464KT224467
Trichoderma hongkongensisTHMAS 273832KX495364KX980154
Trichoderma hunanenseTHMAS 248841KY688039KY687980
Trichoderma junciTCBS 120926FJ860641FJ860540
Trichoderma leguminosarumTCBS 130014KJ665551KJ665288
Trichoderma longibrachiatumTCBS 816.68AY865640DQ087242
Trichoderma longipileTDAOM 177227AF534622AF545550
Trichoderma luteocrystallinumTCBS 123828FJ860646FJ860544
Trichoderma moravicumCPK 2489/CBS 120539FJ860651FJ860549
Trichoderma odoratumTHMAS 271354KT224463KT224468
Trichoderma orientaleCBS 131488JQ685868JQ685884
Trichoderma pseudolacteumTUFC 61490JX238478
Trichoderma psychrophilumCPK 2435/HY 8FJ860682FJ860576
Trichoderma rhododendriTCBS 119288FJ860685FJ860578
Trichoderma rodmaniiTGJS 9188EU338286EU338324
Trichoderma rossicumTDAOM 230011AY937441HQ342288
Trichoderma semiorbisTGJS 99108JN133576JN133567
Trichoderma sinuosumTDAOM:232839KJ871139KJ842198
Trichoderma spinulosumTCBS 31150FJ860701FJ860591
Trichoderma spiraleTDAOM 183974EU280049AF545553
Trichoderma stercorariumATCC 62321FJ860607EF469103
Trichoderma strictipileTDAOM 172827AF534628KJ842162
Trichoderma stromaticumTGJS 97183AF534613AF545539
Trichoderma tomentosumTDAOM 178713aEU279969AF545557
Trichoderma subiculoidesTHMAS 254600MK484604aMK484607
Trichoderma undatipileTHMAS 248854KY688056KY687993
Trichoderma virideTCBS 119325DQ672615EU711362

Numbers in bold indicate the newly provided sequences.

Species labeled as T indicate the sequences from ex-type strains.

List of Hypomyces species, herbarium/strain numbers and GenBank accession numbers of materials used in this study. Numbers in bold indicate the newly provided sequences. Species labeled as T indicate the sequences from ex-type strains. List of Hypocreaceae species, herbarium/strain numbers and GenBank accession numbers of materials used in this study. Numbers in bold indicate the newly provided sequences. Species labeled as T indicate the sequences from ex-type strains.

Results

Phylogenetic analyses

To determine the positions of the Hypomyces collections, the sequences of ITS, LSU, and EF-1α regions of 36 Hypomyces species were analyzed. The PHT (p=.01) indicated that the individual partitions were not highly incongruent [68], thus the three loci were thus combined for phylogenetic analyses. The combined datasets include 2440 characters, of which 1704 were constant, 233 variable and parsimony-uninformative and 503 parsimony-informative. The MP analysis resulted in a single most parsimonious tree (tree length = 2459, CI = 0.4429, HI = 0.5571, RI = 0.5287, RCI = 0.2342). The final matrix was deposited in TreeBASE with accession No. S23771. The MP tree generated is shown in Figure 1. The topology of the ML tree is similar to that of the MP tree. HMAS 254597 clustered with representative species of Hypomyces (MLBP/MPBP = 79%/98%), which confirmed its taxonomic position in the genus.
Figure 1.

A MP tree generated based on the combined datasets of ITS, LSU and EF-1α sequences of Hypomyces species. Supporting values showing at branches: MLBP (left) and MPBP (right). MLBP and MPBP greater than 50% are shown at the nodes. The branch support values ≥90 are indicated by thicker lines. Genbank accession numbers in bold indicate the sequences from ex-type strains. The scale bars indicate number of nucleotide substitutions per site.

A MP tree generated based on the combined datasets of ITS, LSU and EF-1α sequences of Hypomyces species. Supporting values showing at branches: MLBP (left) and MPBP (right). MLBP and MPBP greater than 50% are shown at the nodes. The branch support values ≥90 are indicated by thicker lines. Genbank accession numbers in bold indicate the sequences from ex-type strains. The scale bars indicate number of nucleotide substitutions per site. To place the Trichoderma collection, the sequences of EF-1α and RPB2 regions from 38 species representing 18 clades of Trichoderma, three species of Protocrea, three of Hypomyces and two of Arachnocrea were analyzed by the methods of ML and MP. The PHT (p=.01) indicated that the individual partitions were not highly incongruent [68], the two loci were thus combined for phylogenetic analyses. The combined datasets include 1698 characters, of which 1027 were constant, 118 variable and parsimony-uninformative and 553 parsimony-informative. The MP analysis resulted in three most parsimonious trees (tree length = 3602, CI = 0.2984, HI = 0.7016, RI = 0.5171, RCI = 0.1543). The final matrix was deposited in TreeBASE with accession No. S23772. One of the three MP trees generated is shown in Figure 2. The ML tree is of a similar tree topology. HMAS 254600 was shown as a separate lineage associated with Asterineum, Longibrachiatum, and Virgineum clades of Trichoderma, and further clustered with other species of the genus forming a highly supported monophyletic group (MLBP/MPBP = 100%/98%), which confirmed its taxonomic position in the genus.
Figure 2.

A MP tree generated based on the combined datasets of EF-1α and RPB2 sequences of Trichoderma species and relatives. Supporting values showing at branches: MLBP (left) and MPBP (right). MLBP and MPBP greater than 50% are shown at the nodes. The branch support values ≥90 are indicated by thicker lines. Genbank accession numbers in bold indicate the sequences from ex-type strains. The scale bars indicate number of nucleotide substitutions per site.

A MP tree generated based on the combined datasets of EF-1α and RPB2 sequences of Trichoderma species and relatives. Supporting values showing at branches: MLBP (left) and MPBP (right). MLBP and MPBP greater than 50% are shown at the nodes. The branch support values ≥90 are indicated by thicker lines. Genbank accession numbers in bold indicate the sequences from ex-type strains. The scale bars indicate number of nucleotide substitutions per site.

Taxonomy

Hypomyces hubeiensis Z.Q. Zeng & W.Y. Zhuang, sp. nov.

Fungal Names: FN570597. Description: On CMD, colony radius 14 mm after 7 d at 25 °C, velvet, producing yellowish green pigment in medium, reverse yellowish green; aerial hyphae white, scarce. On MEA, colony radius 13 mm after 7 d at 25 °C, velvet, surface white, reverse white; aerial hyphae white, scarce, forming concentric rings. On PDA, colony radius 13 mm after 7 d at 25 °C, floccose, surface grey white, reverse light sienna; aerial hyphae white, dense, floccose. Conidiophores arising from aerial hyphae, branched, septate, 1–2-verticillate, with terminal whorl of 2–6 phialides. Phialides subulate, tapering toward apex, smooth, 8–20 × 2–3 µm. Conidia rod-shaped to narrowly ellipsoidal, aseptate, hyaline, smooth, 3–6 × 1–2.3 µm. Etymology: The specific epithet refers to the type locality. Holotype: China, Hubei Province, Shennongjia Forestry District, Dajiuhu, on Agaricus sp., September 17 2014, Z.Q. Zeng, W.T. Qin, K. Chen & H.D. Zheng 9791 (HMAS 254597) (Figure 3).
Figure 3.

Hypomyces hubeiensis (HMAS 254597). (A−C) Cultures after 14 d at 25 °C (A: on CMD, B: on MEA, C: on PDA); (D–I) Conidiophores, phialides, and conidia; (J) Phialides and conidia; (K–M) onidia. Scale bar = 10 μm.

Hypomyces hubeiensis (HMAS 254597). (A−C) Cultures after 14 d at 25 °C (A: on CMD, B: on MEA, C: on PDA); (D–I) Conidiophores, phialides, and conidia; (J) Phialides and conidia; (K–M) onidia. Scale bar = 10 μm. Notes: The new species grows on fruitbodies of Agaricus sp. containing only the asexual state. Among the known agaricicolous species of Hypomyces, H. hubeiensis is morphologically similar to H. succineus Rogerson & Samuels and H. tremellicola (Ellis & Everh.) Rogerson in forming verticillium-like conidiophores. But H. succineus differs in occurring on Pholiota sp. rather than Agaricus sp. and having much larger conidia [(7–)8.8–13.3(–16)×(2.4–)3.3–4.2(–5) µm vs. 3–6 × 1–2.3 µm] [15]. H. tremellicola grows on Crepidotus spp. and has larger conidia [5–9 × 3–4(–5) µm vs. 3–6 × 1–2.3 µm] [15].

Hypomyces orthosporus K. Põldmaa

Mycotaxon 59: 390 (1996) = Cladobotryum orthosporum (W. Gams) K. Põldmaa, Mycotaxon 59: 390 (1996) ≡ Sibirina orthospora W. Gams, Persoonia 7: 163 (1973) On CMD, colony radius 46 mm after 7 d at 25 °C, floccose, producing light yellowish brown pigment, reverse brown; aerial hyphae white, scarce. On MEA, colony radius 40 mm after 7 d at 25 °C, floccose, producing light yellowish brown pigment, reverse brown; aerial hyphae white, scarce. On PDA, colony radius 42 mm after 7 d at 25 °C, floccose, producing light yellowish brown pigment; aerial hyphae white, scarce. Conidiophores arising from aerial mycelium, indefinite in length, 1–2-verticillate, with terminal whorl of 3–10 phialides. Phialides subulate, tapering toward apex, hyaline, smooth, 10–35 µm long, 1–1.8 µm at the base. Conidia subcylindrical, sometimes subfusiod, rarely narrowly ellipsoidal (0–)1(–2)-septate, hyaline, smooth, with a rounded tip and a basal hilum, 10–18 × 2.5–5 µm. Specimen examined: China, Tibet, Nyingchi, Mainling, alt. 2800 m, on fruiting body of a polypore, September 12 2016, H.D. Zheng, Z.Q. Zeng, X.C. Wang, K. Chen & Y.B. Zhang 10736 (HMAS 279649) (Figure 4).
Figure 4.

Hypomyces orthosporus (HMAS 279649). (A−C) Cultures after 7 d at 25 °C (A: on CMD, B: on MEA, C: on PDA); (D) Conidiophores and phialides; (E−G) Phialides and conidia; (H−L) onidia. Scale bar: D−G = 10 μm; H−L = 5 μm.

Hypomyces orthosporus (HMAS 279649). (A−C) Cultures after 7 d at 25 °C (A: on CMD, B: on MEA, C: on PDA); (D) Conidiophores and phialides; (E−G) Phialides and conidia; (H−L) onidia. Scale bar: D−G = 10 μm; H−L = 5 μm. Known distribution: China, Estonia, Finland, and The Netherlands. Notes: Sibirina orthospora was described by Gams [69] based on the specimen on decaying wood from The Netherlands with only asexual state described. The sexual and asexual stage connection of the fungus was established by Poldmaa [16] based on the materials collected from Estonia. The phylogenetic tree based on LSU sequences showed that the Chinese collection (HMAS 279649) associated with that from Estonia (TFC 97-130) receiving high support values (MLBP/MPBP = 83%/90%).

Trichoderma subiculoides Z.Q. Zeng & W.Y. Zhuang, sp. nov

Fungal Names: FN570596. Description: Stromata broadly attached on natural substratum, widely effuse to confluent, rudimentary and somewhat subiculum-like, lacking of a defined margin or flank, whitish to beige when dry, cinnamon brown after rehydration, not changing color in 3% KOH, 3–7 × 2–5 mm, 0.4 mm thick. Ostiolar dots distinct, dirty brownish to light brown when dry, brown to dark brown when rehydrated. In section, cortical tissue of textura globulosa, 5–25 µm thick, cells light yellow, 1.5–5 × 1.5–4.5 µm; subcortical tissue of textura intricata, hyphae hyaline to pale brown, 2–3.5 µm thick; subperithecial tissue of textura epidermoidea, cells hyaline, thin-walled, 5–10 × 3–5 µm. Perithecia globose, subglobose to pyriform, 138–193 × 105–150 µm; peridium 6–12 µm thick at flanks, 15–30 µm thick at the base. Papilla prominent, blunt or truncate, brown, 18–63 µm high, 35–58 µm wide at the base. Asci subcylindrical, 78–115 × 2.8–5 µm. Part-ascospores hyaline, smooth, dimorphic, distal cells broadly ellipsoidal to globose, 3.5–5 × 2–4 µm, l/w 1–2; proximal cells ellipsoidal, 4–5 × 2–4 µm, l/w 1.3–2. On CMD, colony radius 10 mm after 7 d at 20 °C, 41 mm at 25 °C, no growth at 30 and 35 °C, white, velvet; aerial hyphae scarce, hyaline. On PDA, colony radius 10 mm after 7 d at 20 °C, 26 mm at 25 °C, 8 mm at 30 °C, no growth at 35 °C, white, velvet; aerial hyphae dense, hyaline. On SNA, colony radius 9 mm after 7 d at 20 °C, 5 mm at 25 °C, no growth at 30 and 35 °C, producing cream to pale yellow pigment; aerial hyphae hyaline, scarce. Conidiophores arising from aerial mycelium, branched, branches septate, 1–2-verticillate, with the terminal whorl of 2–4 phialides, 15–55 × 2–3.5 µm. Phialides subcylindrical, tapering toward apex, smooth, 5–25 × 1.5–3 µm. Conidia subellipsoidal to rod-shaped, hyaline, smooth, 3–9 × 1.5–3 µm. No distinct odor detected. Etymology: The specific epithet refers to the subiculum-like and rudimentary stromata. Holotype: China, Guangdong Province, Shixing County, Chebaling National Nature Reserve, on rotten branch, 2 November 2015, Z.Q. Zeng, X.C. Wang, K. Chen & Y.B. Zhang 10623 (HMAS 254600) (Figure 5).
Figure 5.

Trichoderma subiculoides (HMAS 254600). (A,B) Stroma on nature substrate; (C) Color of stroma after rehydration; (D) Color of rehydrated stroma in 3% KOH; (E−G) Cultures after 14 d at 25 °C (E: on CMD, F: on SNA, G: on PDA); (H) Perithecium in section; (I) Structure of perithecial at upper portion; (J) Ascus with ascospores; (K−O) Part-ascospores; (P) Phialides and conidia; (Q) Cortical and subcortical tissues in section; (R) Subperithecial tissue in section; (S−W) Conidia. Scale bars: A = 1 cm; B−D = 1 mm; H, I = 50 μm; J−P = 10 μm; Q, R = 20 μm; S−W = 10 μm.

Trichoderma subiculoides (HMAS 254600). (A,B) Stroma on nature substrate; (C) Color of stroma after rehydration; (D) Color of rehydrated stroma in 3% KOH; (E−G) Cultures after 14 d at 25 °C (E: on CMD, F: on SNA, G: on PDA); (H) Perithecium in section; (I) Structure of perithecial at upper portion; (J) Ascus with ascospores; (K−O) Part-ascospores; (P) Phialides and conidia; (Q) Cortical and subcortical tissues in section; (R) Subperithecial tissue in section; (S−W) Conidia. Scale bars: A = 1 cm; B−D = 1 mm; H, I = 50 μm; J−P = 10 μm; Q, R = 20 μm; S−W = 10 μm. Notes: Among the known species of Trichoderma, T. subiculoides is morphologically similar to T. confluens W.T. Qin & W.Y. Zhuang and T. pseudolacteum C.S. Kim & N. Maek. in having effuse to confluent stromata which are broadly attached to substrates [70,71]. However, T. subiculoides differs from T. confluens in stromatal gross morphology and perithecia not changing color in 3% KOH, smaller perithecia (138–193 × 105–150 µm vs. 180–268 × 123–185 µm), ellipsoidal instead of globose, subglobose to nearly wedge-shaped proximal part-ascospores, and the absence of chlamydospores [70]. The RPB2 sequence of T. subiculoides differs from that of T. confluens by 64 bp divergences in a total length of 751 bp. Trichoderma subiculoides can be easily distinguished from T. pseudolacteum by narrower asci (2.8–5 µm vs. 5.9–7.1 µm wide), smaller part-ascospores (distal 3.5–5 × 2–4 µm vs. 5.4–6.5 × 5.0–5.9 µm, proximal 4–5 × 2–4 µm vs. 5.3–6.9 × 4.3–5.2 µm), ellipsoidal to rod-shaped rather than globose to subglobose conidia [71]. Sequence comparisons revealed that there are 62 bp unmatched loci among 452 bp for partial RPB2 region between the type strains (HMAS 254600 and TUFC 61490).

Discussion

Hypomyces is connected with diverse asexual states, such as mycogone-like, stephanoma-like, papulaspora-like, sepedonium-like, verticillium-like, acremonium-like, and cladobotryum-like [2]. Host fungi in combination with types of asexual states are regarded as important taxonomic criteria for species identifications [17]. Asexual states are sometimes even critical to distinguish genera in Hypocreaceae. Due to that H. berkeleyanus Plowr. & Cooke and H. broomeanus Tul. & C. Tul. are of gliocladium-like asexual states, Rehner and Samuels [9] and Põldmaa et al. [11] excluded them from Hypomyces and transferred these two species to another genus Sphaerostilbella (Henn.) Sacc. & D. Sacc. The taxonomic position of H. hubeiensis is revealed based on the sequence analyses of ITS, LSU, and EF-1α regions (Figure 1) as well as the morphological characters such as the substrate and verticillate conidiophores. However, its complete life cycle and infra-specific variation await future investigation. Some Hypomyces species with asexual states unknown due to their ascospores not germinating in laboratory condition [27]. Establishment of asexual and sexual state connections for these fungi will provide essential information about life cycle of the whole fungus. Stroma is a vegetative tissue that subtends or surrounds the ascomata [2]. Tissues of the stromata of Trichoderma are composed of textura angularis, textura globulosa, textura intricata, textura prismatica, and textura epidermoidea depending on locations of the tissues. Stromatal anatomy is considered as one of the important morphological characters at generic and species levels for taxonomy of Hypocreaceae [2]. Most species of Trichoderma have pulvinate, disciform, flat, peltate, turbinate, hemisphericalor or clavate stromata which are usually of a well-defined margin and flanks [2,59,72], while very few species possess rudimentary or subiculum-like stromata, such as T. alcalifuscescens (Overton) Jaklitsch & Voglmayr, T. delicatulum Jaklitsch and T. parmastoi (Overton) Jaklitsch & Voglmayr [47]. In Hypocreaceae the genera Arachnocrea Z. Moravec and Protocrea Petch produce subiculum surrounding their perithecia. However, the anatomic structure of T. subiculoides reveals that the fungus has a subiculum-like stroma instead of true subiculum that a cortical layer is present on the stromatal upper surface and the individual stromata lack of well-developed margin and flanks. Sequence analyses indicated that T. subiculoides clustered with other Trichoderma species receiving high bootstrap supports (MLBP/MPBP = 100%/98%) as a separate lineage and does not belong to any existing clades.
  25 in total

1.  An oligonucleotide barcode for species identification in Trichoderma and Hypocrea.

Authors:  Irina S Druzhinina; Alexei G Kopchinskiy; Monika Komoń; John Bissett; George Szakacs; Christian P Kubicek
Journal:  Fungal Genet Biol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.495

2.  Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined?

Authors:  C W Cunningham
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Biodiversity of Trichoderma (Hypocreaceae) in Southern Europe and Macaronesia.

Authors:  W M Jaklitsch; H Voglmayr
Journal:  Stud Mycol       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 16.097

4.  Bioremediation of heavy metals in liquid media through fungi isolated from contaminated sources.

Authors:  P K Joshi; Anand Swarup; Sonu Maheshwari; Raman Kumar; Namita Singh
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 2.461

5.  A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-alpha sequences: evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs.

Authors:  Stephen A Rehner; Ellen Buckley
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.696

6.  Tropical species of Cladobotryum and Hypomyces producing red pigments.

Authors:  Kadri Põldmaa
Journal:  Stud Mycol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 16.097

7.  Trichoderma martiale sp. nov., a new endophyte from sapwood of Theobroma cacao with a potential for biological control.

Authors:  Rogério E Hanada; T de Jorge Souza; Alan W V Pomella; K Prakash Hebbar; José O Pereira; Adnan Ismaiel; Gary J Samuels
Journal:  Mycol Res       Date:  2008-07-11

8.  Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species.

Authors:  R Vilgalys; M Hester
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  European species of Hypocrea part II: species with hyaline ascospores.

Authors:  Walter M Jaklitsch
Journal:  Fungal Divers       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 20.372

10.  Accepted Trichoderma names in the year 2015.

Authors:  John Bissett; Walter Gams; Walter Jaklitsch; Gary J Samuels
Journal:  IMA Fungus       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 3.515

View more
  3 in total

1.  MIST: a Multilocus Identification System for Trichoderma.

Authors:  Kai Dou; Zhixiang Lu; Qiong Wu; Mi Ni; Chuanjin Yu; Meng Wang; Yaqian Li; Xinhua Wang; Huilan Xie; Jie Chen; Chulong Zhang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Hypomyces pseudolactifluorum sp. nov. (Hypocreales: Hypocreaceae) on Russula sp. from Yunnan, PR China.

Authors:  Feng-Ming Yu; Ruvishika S Jayawardena; Jianwei Liu; Kevin D Hyde; Qi Zhao
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2020-09-28

3.  Five new species of Trichoderma from moist soils in China.

Authors:  Guang-Zhi Zhang; He-Tong Yang; Xin-Jian Zhang; Fang-Yuan Zhou; Xiao-Qing Wu; Xue-Ying Xie; Xiao-Yan Zhao; Hong-Zi Zhou
Journal:  MycoKeys       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.984

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.