| Literature DB >> 31565296 |
Parul Sharma1, Adikshita Sharma2, Monica Sharma2, Nikhil Bhalla3,4, Pedro Estrela3, Aditya Jain5, Preeti Thakur6, Atul Thakur7.
Abstract
Recent advances in engineering lead to the fabrication of nanomaterials with unique properties targeted toward specific applications. The use of nanotechnology in agriculture, in particular for plant protection and production, is an under-explored area in the research community. Fungal diseases are one of the leading causes of crop destruction and, in this context, the antifungal effect of nanoparticles of cobalt and nickel ferrite against phytopathogenic fungi is reported here. As a proof of concept, it is also shown how such nanoparticles can be used as fungicides in plants. The developed cobalt and nickel ferrite nanoparticles (CoFe2O4 and NiFe2O4) are successfully tested for antimycotic activity against three plant-pathogenic fungi: Fusarium oxysporum, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, and Dematophora necatrix. In addition, it is also observed that these ferrite nanoparticles reduce the incidence of Fusarium wilt in capsicum. The study suggests that nanoparticles of CoFe2O4 and NiFe2O4 can be used as an effective fungicide in plant disease management.Entities:
Keywords: antifungal; nanoagriculture; nanoferrite; nanofertilizers
Year: 2017 PMID: 31565296 PMCID: PMC6607179 DOI: 10.1002/gch2.201700041
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glob Chall ISSN: 2056-6646
Figure 1TEM images of a) CoFe2O4 and b) NiFe2O4. Both nanoferrites show spherical nanostructures with an average size of 25 nm.
Figure 2XRD images of a) CoFe2O4 and b) NiFe2O4.
Figure 3Raman active modes of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles as a function of temperature (1100–700 °C).
Figure 4FTIR Transmission of a) CoFe2O4 and b) NiFe2O4 nanoparticles.
In vitro efficacy of nanoparticles of a) CoFe2O4 and b) NiFe2O4 against mycelial growth of three different plant pathogenic fungi. (Figures in parentheses are arcsine‐transformed values)
| Plant pathogenic fungi | Mycelial growth inhibition [%] | CD0.01 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 ppm | 200 ppm | 300 ppm | 400 ppm | 500 ppm | Mean | ||
| In vitro efficacy of nanoparticles of CoFe2O4 | |||||||
|
| 39.45 (38.89) | 46.39 (42.91) | 56.67 (48.82) | 77.23 (61.48) | 78.91 (62.63) | 59.73 | 1.03 |
|
| 39.44 (38.88) | 50.00 (44.98) | 59.45 (59.44) | 75.56 (60.35) | 88.90 (70.51) | 62.67 | 1.10 |
|
| 41.10 (39.77) | 50.28 (45.14) | 63.64 (52.92) | 75.84 (60.54) | 87.62 (69.37) | 63.70 | 4.29 |
| In vitro efficacy of nanoparticles of NiFe2O4 | |||||||
|
| 43.25 (41.10) | 54.06 (47.31) | 61.94 (51.89) | 78.06 (62.05) | 81.39 (64.42) | 63.74 | 1.04 |
|
| 43.61 (41.31) | 52.78 (46.57) | 61.39 (51.57) | 78.89 (62.64) | 93.33 (75.00) | 66.00 | 1.75 |
|
| 58.06 (49.63) | 60.28 (50.92) | 68.61 (55.92) | 83.33 (65.94) | 89.45 (71.02) | 71.95 | 2.35 |
Figure 5a) Induction of microcycle conidiation in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides at (1) 500 ppm of nickel nanoparticles compared to (2) untreated control. b) Inhibitory effect of (1) nickel nanoparticles at 500 ppm compared to (2) untreated control on mycelia growth of Dematophora necatrix. c) Inhibitory effect of nickel nanoparticles at 500 ppm (1) compared to untreated control (2) on mycelia growth of Fusarium oxysoprum.
Evaluation of CoFe2O4 and NiFe2O4 nanoparticles under pot culture conditions against Fusarium wilt of capsicum. (Figures in the parentheses are arc sine transformed values)
| Ferrite nanoparticles | Concentration [ppm] | Disease incidence [%] | Disease reduction [%] |
|---|---|---|---|
| CoFe2O4 | 100 | 90.47 (75.18) | 9.54 |
| 200 | 76.18 (61.54) | 23.83 | |
| 300 | 38.09 (37.39) | 61.92 | |
| 400 | 28.57 (32.57) | 71.43 | |
| 500 | 9.52 (10.77) | 90.49 | |
| NiFe2O4 | 100 | 80.95 (68.95) | 19.07 |
| 200 | 57.12 (49.07) | 42.88 | |
| 300 | 23.80 (28.94) | 76.21 | |
| 400 | 9.52 (10.77) | 90.49 | |
| 500 | 0.00 (0.00) | 100.00 | |
| Control | – | 100.00 (90.00) | – |
| CD(0.05) | 20.56 |
Figure 6Effect of a) CoFe2O4 and b) NiFe2O4 ferrite nanoparticles against Fusarium wilt of capsicum under pot culture conditions compared to c) control.