| Literature DB >> 31565037 |
Mourouge Saadi Alwash1, Hawraa Mohammed Al-Rafyai1.
Abstract
Surface water contamination remains a major worldwide public health concern and may contribute to the dissemination of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. The Al-Hillah River in the city of Babylon Province, Iraq, diverts flows from the Euphrates River. Because of its importance in irrigation and population density, it faces several forced and unforced changes due to anthropogenic activities. To evaluate water quality, water samples were collected from three sites with different anthropogenic pressures along the Al-Hillah River. These samples were subjected to bacteriological analyses, i.e., total coliforms, Escherichia coli, and faecal enterococci. The phylogenetic groups of the E. coli isolates (n = 61) were typed by rapid PCR-based analyses. Representatives of each isolate were tested phenotypically for resistance to six classes of antibiotics and characterized according to their phylogenetic groups. The results demonstrated the highest resistance levels were to β-lactam antibiotics, followed by fosfomycin and aminoglycosides. Escherichia coli isolates belonging to phylogenetic groups A and B2 were the most common and were characterized by a higher prevalence of antibiotic resistance. This study is important for understanding the current conditions of the Al-Hillah River, as the data reveal a high prevalence of multiresistance among E. coli isolates circulating at the three sampling sites.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31565037 PMCID: PMC6745164 DOI: 10.1155/2019/5927059
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1Locations of three sampling sites (S1–S3) along the Al-Hillah River, Babylon province, Iraq.
Bacteriological parameters of the Al-Hillah River in three sampling sites.
| Sites | BOD (mg/L) | TC | EC | E CFU/100 mL (CFU × 103) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 4.15 ± 0.03 | 3.6 ± 0–4.7 ± 0 | 3 ± 0–3.5 ± 0 | 0–1.9 ± 0 |
| S2 | 3.7 ± 0 | 3.4 ± 0–4.6 ± 0 | 2.9 ± 0–3.4 ± 0 | 0–1.6 ± 0 |
| S3 | 3.14 ± 0 | 3 ± 0–4.6 ± 0 | 2.8 ± 0–3.3 ± 0 | 0–1.3 ± 0 |
| Standard limits |
|
|
|
|
TC, total coliform; EC, Escherichia coli; E, Enterococci. Maxima and minima bacterial counts obtained from three sampling sites. Statistically significant correlation coefficients with p ≤ 0.05. All analyses from the three sampling sites were performed in triplicate and the standard deviations were less than 1.5% of averages.
Figure 2Distribution of the E. coli phylogenetic groups among the three sampling sites located along the Al-Hillah River. Distribution of E. coli (a) according to the phylogenetic groups (A, B1, B2, D) and (b) according to phylogenetic groups subtyping (A0/A1, B22/B23, and D1/D2).
Figure 3Distribution of antibiotic resistance prevalence among the three sampling sites.
Figure 4Principal component analysis biplot of the AR patterns of the E. coli phylogenetic groups from the three sampling sites along the Al-Hillah River. The red arrows indicate E. coli isolates resistant to 15 antibiotics with respect to their phylogenetic groups. Class I, CN, aminoglycosidase: gentamicin; AK: amikacin; S: streptomycin, Class II, TE, tetracyclines: tetracycline; DO: doxycycline, Class III, AMP, β-lactams: ampicillin; IMP: imipenem; KF: cephalothin; FOX: cefoxitin; CTX: cefotaxime; FEP: cefepime, Class IV, NOR, fluoroquinolone: norfloxacin; CIP: ciprofloxacin, Class V, FF: fosfomycin, Class VI, C, phenicol: chloramphenicol.
Figure 5Distribution of the phylogenetic groups based on the number of antibiotic resistance patterns in E. coli.