| Literature DB >> 31564932 |
Jingfang Liu1, Chenge Wang1, Xulei Tang1, Songbo Fu1, Gaojing Jing1, Lihua Ma1, Weiming Sun1, Yujuan Li1, Dan Wu1, Ying Niu1, Qianglong Niu1, Huiping Guo1, Pei Song1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the relationship between the metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components with the occurrence of thyroid nodules.Entities:
Keywords: metabolic syndrome; risk factors; thyroid nodules; waist circumference
Year: 2019 PMID: 31564932 PMCID: PMC6724178 DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S219019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes ISSN: 1178-7007 Impact factor: 3.168
Comparison between the MetS (+) group and MetS (-) group
| Parameters | MetS (+) | MetS (-) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (Year) | 52.57±14.66 | 40.72±14.27 | <0.0001 |
| WC (cm) | 91.99±8.62 | 82.61±9.52 | <0.0001 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 2.55±1.77 | 1.41±1.00 | <0.0001 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.35±0.38 | 1.52±0.38 | <0.0001 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 148.89±19.85 | 123.71±16.44 | <0.0001 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 87.99±13.09 | 77.11±22.25 | <0.0001 |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 6.58±2.41 | 5.25±1.12 | <0.0001 |
| 2hPG (mmol/L) | 10.24±5.00 | 6.45±2.90 | <0.0001 |
Abbreviations: WC, waist circumference; TG, triglycerides; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; 2hPG, 2h postprandial plasma glucose; MetS (+), metabolic syndrome group; MetS (-), non-metabolic syndrome group.
Comparation of related parameters between TN (+) group and TN (-) group
| TN (+) | TN (-) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (Year) | 53.23±15.64 | 40.33±13.80 | <0.0001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.28±3.09 | 23.60±5.88 | 0.016 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 134.59±21.45 | 124.46±17.21 | <0.0001 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 79.42±12.37 | 77.93±23.23 | 0.179 |
| WC (cm) | 85.22±9.94 | 83.19±9.78 | <0.0001 |
| Heart rate (Times/Min) | 80.20±12.52 | 80.08±11.91 | 0.849 |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 5.83±1.83 | 5.29±1.22 | <0.0001 |
| 2hPG (mmol/L) | 7.96±4.33 | 6.59±3.08 | <0.0001 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.67±1.12 | 1.50±1.16 | 0.003 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.62±1.05 | 4.36±0.93 | <0.0001 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.54±0.40 | 1.51±0.38 | 0.109 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 2.77±0.77 | 2.55±0.72 | 0.241 |
| HbA1C (%) | 5.69±1.09 | 5.61±0.91 | 0.818 |
| TSH (mIU/L) | 3.58±3.58 | 3.34±3.20 | <0.0001 |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; WC, waist circumference; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; 2hPG, 2h postprandial plasma glucose; TG, triglycerides; TC, cholesterol; HDL – C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HbA1C, glycosylated hemoglobin; TSH, thyroid stimulating hormone; TN (+), Thyroid nodule group; TN (-), Non-Thyroid nodule group.
Correlation between the degrees of metabolic disorder and thyroid nodules
| Model-1 | Model-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
| Sex | - | - | 1.540 | (1.241 1.910) ** |
| Age | - | - | 1.054 | (1.046 1.062) ** |
| 5 | - | - | - | - |
| 1 | 1.721 | (1.308 2.266) ** | 1.187 | (0.885 1.592) |
| 2 | 2.776 | (2.082 3.701) ** | 1.516 | (1.105 2.080) * |
| 3 | 3.108 | (2.234 4.323) ** | 1.464 | (1.010 2.122) * |
| 4 | 3.818 | (2.515 5.797) ** | 1.710 | (1.241 1.910) * |
Notes: Group 1: subjects with one component of MetS; group 2: subjects with two components of MetS; group 3: subjects with three components of MetS; group 4: subjects with four components of MetS, group 5: subjects without any component of MetS (control group). Model-1: not adjusting any confounding factors. Model-2 adjust gender and age based on model-1. *P<0.05; **P<0.0001.
Single factor regression analysis of each component of MetS and thyroid nodules
| OR | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| WC | 1.021 | (1.011, 1.032) | |
| SBP | 1.027 | (1.022, 1.032) | |
| DBP | 1.004 | 0.121 | (0.999, 1.010) |
| FPG | 1.240 | (1.164, 1.321) | |
| 2hPG | 1.098 | (1.071, 1.125) | |
| TG | 1.133 | (1.047, 1.226) | |
| HDL-C | 0.993 | 0.648 | (0.963, 1.024) |
Note: The bold font highlights the statistical differences.
Multiple factors regression analysis of the components of MetS and thyroid nodules
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | OR | OR | ||||
| Sex | – | – | – | – | 1.015 | |
| Age | – | – | – | – | 1.054 | |
| TSH | 1.031 | 1.027 | 1.007 | 0.638 | ||
| WC | 1.009 | 0.104 | 1.013 | 1.015 | ||
| SBP | 1.029 | 1.028 | 1.005 | 0.233 | ||
| DBP | 0.980 | 0.979 | 0.996 | 0.460 | ||
| FPG | 1.056 | 0.306 | 1.069 | 0.222 | 1.067 | 0.160 |
| 2hPG | 1.058 | 1.054 | 0.974 | 0.270 | ||
| TG | 1.015 | 0.553 | 1.067 | 0.190 | 1.062 | 0.249 |
| HDL-C | 0.994 | 0.712 | 1.414 | 1.281 | 0.188 | |
| TC | – | 0.849 | 0.699 | 1.062 | 0.308 | |
| LDL-C | – | – | 1.196 | 1.119 | 0.375 | |
| HbA1C | – | – | 0.989 | 0.459 | 0.990 | 0.373 |
Notes: Model-1: including each component of MetS, and not adjusting any confounding factors; Model-2: adjusting TC、LDL-C、HbA1C levels based on Model-1; Model 3: adjusting age, sex levels based on Model-2. The bold font highlights the statistical differences.
Correlation between the group of the WC and thyroid nodules
| Model-1 | Model-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
| Sex | – | – | 1.665 | (1.323, 2.093) ** |
| Age | – | – | 1.057 | (1.049, 1.064) ** |
| <80 cm | – | – | – | – |
| 80~89 cm | 1.155 | (0.904, 1.475) | 1.072 | (0.823, 1.097) |
| 90~99 cm | 1.598 | (1.225, 2.085) * | 1.409 | (1.041, 1.908) * |
| >100 cm | 1.919 | (1.277, 2.883) * | 1.747 | (1.099, 2.775) * |
Notes: Model-1: WC<80cm as control group according to WC levels, not adjusting any confounding factors; Model-2: adjusting age, and sex levels based on Model-1. *P<0.05, **P<0.0001.