| Literature DB >> 31564909 |
Kun Zuo1, Youhong Zhao1, Yukun Zheng2, Xiaoli Liu1, Song Du1, Qing Liu1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate the functional role of long non-coding RNA XIST in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).Entities:
Keywords: EOC; XIST; invasion; migration; prognosis; proliferation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31564909 PMCID: PMC6733346 DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S204369
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Onco Targets Ther ISSN: 1178-6930 Impact factor: 4.147
Figure 1Expression of lncRNA XIST was associated with poor survival in EOC patients. (A) The qRT-PCR analysis of XIST expression in 98 pairs EOC tissues and adjacent tissues; (B) The qRT-PCR analysis of XIST expression in different EOC cell lines (OVCAR3, OV90, A2780, and SKOV3) and human ovarian surface epithelial cell line (HOSE); (C) Kaplan-Meier analysis of the correlation of XIST expression with PFS in EOC patients; (D) Kaplan-Meier analysis of the correlation of XIST expression with OS in EOC patients.
Notes: *P<0.05, **P<0.01.
Abbreviations: XIST, X-inactive specific transcript; EOC, epithelial ovarian cancer; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival.
Correlations between XIST expression and clinicopathological parameters in EOC patients
| Parameter | Total | XIST expression | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low ( | High (n=52) | ||||
| Age (years) | 2.481 | 0.173 | |||
| <55 | 44 | 24 (52.2%) | 20 (38.5%) | ||
| ≥55 | 54 | 22 (47.8%) | 32 (61.5%) | ||
| Tumor grade | 5.544 | 0.019 | |||
| G1 | 39 | 24 (52.2%) | 15 (28.8%) | ||
| G2+G3 | 59 | 22 (47.8%) | 37 (71.2%) | ||
| Tumor size (cm) | 0.179 | 0.672 | |||
| <10 | 66 | 30 (65.2%) | 36 (69.2%) | ||
| ≥10 | 32 | 16 (34.8%) | 16 (30.8%) | ||
| Distant metastasis | 5.292 | 0.021 | |||
| No | 54 | 31 (67.4%) | 23 (44.2%) | ||
| Yes | 44 | 15 (32.6%) | 29 (55.8%) | ||
| FIGO stage | 6.599 | 0.010 | |||
| I+II | 34 | 22 (47.8%) | 12 (23.1%) | ||
| III+IV | 64 | 24 (52.2%) | 40 (76.9%) | ||
Abbreviations: XIST, X-inactive specific transcript; EOC, epithelial ovarian cancer.
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of prognostic factors in EOC patients
| Variable | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% Cl) | HR (95% Cl) | |||
| Age (years) (<55 vs ≥55) | 0.836 (0.548–1.278) | 0.409 | ||
| Tumor size (cm) (<10 vs ≥10) | 1.157 (0.736–1.818) | 0.527 | ||
| Distant metastasis (no vs yes) | 2.803 (1.799–4.368) | <0.001 | 2.568 (1.454–4.536) | 0.001 |
| Tumor grade (G1 vs G2+G3) | 2.421 (1.546–3.791) | <0.001 | 1.734 (1.365–3.027) | 0.047 |
| FIGO stage (I+II vs III+IV) | 2.738 (1.716–4.367) | <0.001 | 2.500 (1.465–3.980) | 0.003 |
| XIST expression level (low vs high) | 1.744 (1.133–2.683) | 0.011 | 1.924 (1.275–3.382) | 0.035 |
Abbreviations: EOC, epithelial ovarian cancer; XIST, X-inactive specific transcript.
Figure 2Knockdown of XIST inhibited malignant behavior of EOC cell. (A) qRT-PCR analysis of the transfection efficiency of si-XIST in SKOV3 and OVCAR3 cell line; (B) CCK-8 assay was performed to investigate the proliferation ability of SKOV3 and OVCAR3 cell; (C) Invasion and migration ability of SKOV3 and OVCAR3 cell was evaluated by Transwell assay; (D) Analysis of migration capacity of SKOV3 and OVCAR3 cell by wound healing assay.
Notes: *P>0.05, **P<0.05; ***P<0.01.
Abbreviations: XIST, X-inactive specific transcript; EOC, epithelial ovarian cancer.