Literature DB >> 31564582

Validation of randomized controlled trial-derived models for the prediction of postintervention outcomes in chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

Joep G J Wijnand1, Ian D van Koeverden2, Martin Teraa1, Marlon I Spreen3, Willem P T M Mali4, Hans van Overhagen3, Gerard Pasterkamp5, Gert J de Borst6, Michael S Conte7, Hendrik Gremmels8, Marianne C Verhaar9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) represents the most severe form of peripheral artery disease and has a large impact on quality of life, morbidity, and mortality. Interventions are aimed at improving tissue perfusion and averting amputation and secondary cardiovascular complications with an optimal risk-benefit ratio. Several prediction models regarding postprocedural outcomes in CLTI patients have been developed on the basis of randomized controlled trials to improve clinical decision-making. We aimed to determine model performance in predicting clinical outcomes in selected CLTI cohorts.
METHODS: This study validated the Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL), Finland National Vascular registry (FINNVASC), and Prevention of Infrainguinal Vein Graft Failure (PREVENT III) models in data sets from a peripheral artery disease registry study (Athero-Express) and two randomized controlled trials of CLTI in The Netherlands, Rejuvenating Endothelial Progenitor Cells via Transcutaneous Intra-arterial Supplementation (JUVENTAS) and Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty and Drug-eluting Stents for Infrapopliteal Lesions in Critical Limb Ischemia (PADI). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to calculate their predictive capacity. The primary outcome was amputation-free survival (AFS); secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and amputation at 12 months after intervention.
RESULTS: The BASIL and PREVENT III models showed predictive values regarding postintervention mortality in the JUVENTAS cohort with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 81% and 70%, respectively. Prediction of AFS was poor to fair (AUC, 0.60-0.71) for all models in each population, with the highest predictive value of 71% for the BASIL model in the JUVENTAS population. The FINNVASC model showed the highest predictive value regarding amputation risk in the PADI population with AUC of 78% at 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: In general, all models performed poor to fair in predicting mortality and amputation. Because the BASIL model performed best in predicting AFS, we propose use of the BASIL model to aid in the clinical decision-making process in CLTI. However, improvements in performance have to be made for any of these models to be of real additional value in clinical practice.
Copyright © 2019 Society for Vascular Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amputation-free survival; Critical limb-threatening ischemia; Prediction models; Validation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31564582     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.06.195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  2 in total

1.  One-year mortality rates after minor and major amputations of the lower limbs.

Authors:  Jose M Pereira de Godoy; Germano Giroldo Tazinaffo; Barbara Lasmine Gomes Abreu Christo; Maria de Fátima Guerreiro Godoy
Journal:  Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis       Date:  2021-12-07

Review 2.  A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

Authors:  Philip Goodney; Samir Shah; Yiyuan David Hu; Bjoern Suckow; Scott Kinlay; David G Armstrong; Patrick Geraghty; Megan Patterson; Matthew Menard; Manesh R Patel; Michael S Conte
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.860

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.