Salina Teja1, Lauren Sawatzky2, Theresa Wiens2, David Maberley2, Patrick Ma2. 1. Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C.. Electronic address: salinazteja@gmail.com. 2. Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the functional and morphological effects of the intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex, Allergan) on patients with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO), diabetic retinopathy (DME), posterior noninfectious uveitis (NIU), or pseudophakic Irvine-Gass syndrome (IGS). METHODS: 144 charts were retrospectively reviewed; 100 eyes met inclusion criteria for analysis: at least one intravitreal dexamethasone implant injection, refractory to antivascular endothelial growth factor, and had ≥6 months of follow-up postinsertion. The primary outcome was the efficacy of the dexamethasone implant in reducing macular edema as measured by reduction in central retinal thickness (CRT). Secondary outcomes included visual acuity (VA), duration of treatment efficacy (measured by time to next treatment), and safety. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare values from baseline, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to analyze time to retreatment. RESULTS: There were 28 patients with RVO, 30 with DME, 24 with posterior NIU, and 18 with IGS. VA improved from baseline to month 6 in all groups, but was not statistically significant. CRT improved in all 4 groups, and was statistically significant for DME (p = 0.008) and NIU (p = 0.05). At 3 months, 34 patients (41.5%) required retreatment; by month 6, 46 patients (56.1%) required retreatment. There was a large variation between the groups in number of patients requiring intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medications. Two patients needed IOP-lowering surgery. One patient developed endophthalmitis. CONCLUSION: The use of intravitreal dexamethasone implants in patients with refractory retinal diseases is well tolerated and results in consistently improved anatomic outcomes, but the positive anatomic outcomes are not necessarily correlated to improvements in visual function. Patients who are treated earlier in the disease process will had better outcomes. This patient population were refractory to treatment and, therefore, have less-predictable functional outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the functional and morphological effects of the intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex, Allergan) on patients with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO), diabetic retinopathy (DME), posterior noninfectious uveitis (NIU), or pseudophakic Irvine-Gass syndrome (IGS). METHODS: 144 charts were retrospectively reviewed; 100 eyes met inclusion criteria for analysis: at least one intravitreal dexamethasone implant injection, refractory to antivascular endothelial growth factor, and had ≥6 months of follow-up postinsertion. The primary outcome was the efficacy of the dexamethasone implant in reducing macular edema as measured by reduction in central retinal thickness (CRT). Secondary outcomes included visual acuity (VA), duration of treatment efficacy (measured by time to next treatment), and safety. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare values from baseline, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to analyze time to retreatment. RESULTS: There were 28 patients with RVO, 30 with DME, 24 with posterior NIU, and 18 with IGS. VA improved from baseline to month 6 in all groups, but was not statistically significant. CRT improved in all 4 groups, and was statistically significant for DME (p = 0.008) and NIU (p = 0.05). At 3 months, 34 patients (41.5%) required retreatment; by month 6, 46 patients (56.1%) required retreatment. There was a large variation between the groups in number of patients requiring intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medications. Two patients needed IOP-lowering surgery. One patient developed endophthalmitis. CONCLUSION: The use of intravitreal dexamethasone implants in patients with refractory retinal diseases is well tolerated and results in consistently improved anatomic outcomes, but the positive anatomic outcomes are not necessarily correlated to improvements in visual function. Patients who are treated earlier in the disease process will had better outcomes. This patient population were refractory to treatment and, therefore, have less-predictable functional outcomes.