Literature DB >> 31563537

Ejaculatory Preserving Middle Lobe Onl-Transurethral Resection and Vaporization of the Prostate: 12-Year Experience.

Zeynep Gul1, Bilal Chughtai2, Alexis E Te2, Dominique Thomas2, Steven A Kaplan3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report long-term safety and efficacy data on middle lobe only-transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) (MLO-TURP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated: (1) efficacy: International Prostate Symptom Score, Quality of Life, peak flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual urine, International Index of Erectile Function and ejaculatory function, which was assessed by the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire. Men were evaluated at 1 month, 6 months, and yearly thereafter.
RESULTS: A total 312 men (mean age 61.3 ± 8.6) with significant lower urinary tract symptoms (n = 147) or urinary retention (n = 175 were treated with MLO-TURP from 2005 to 2017. Mean baseline prostate volume was 79.8 g (30-178 g); mean baseline intravesical-prostatic protrusion was 13.6. Improvements in International Prostate Symptom Score, Quality of Life, Qmax and postvoid residual urine were durable throughout the study period. There was no difference in outcomes between monopolar and bipolar MLO-TURPs. Postoperatively, the incidence of ejaculatory dysfunction was 2.6% (N = 8) and there was 1 case of new onset ED (0.3%). There were modest improvement in bother due to ejaculatory function (baseline: 2.4 and at 5 years: 1.27).
CONCLUSION: MLO-TURP is a safe and effective treatment for men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Patients experience long-term improvement of symptoms and preserve antegrade ejaculation. In select men with prominent middle lobes, MLO-- should be considered a therapeutic, ejaculation-sparing option.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31563537     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.07.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  3 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacological and interventional treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: An evidence-based comparative review.

Authors:  Sachin Malde; Wayne Lam; Zainal Adwin; Hashim Hashim
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2021-02-03

2.  Meta-analysis with individual data of functional outcomes following Aquablation for lower urinary tract symptoms due to BPH in various prostate anatomies.

Authors:  Dean Elterman; Peter Gilling; Claus Roehrborn; Neil Barber; Vincent Misrai; Kevin C Zorn; Naeem Bhojani; Alexis Te; Mitch Humphreys; Steven Kaplan; Mihir Desai; Thorsten Bach
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2021-06-23

Review 3.  Electrosurgery or laser for benign prostatic enlargement: trumpcard or pitfalls.

Authors:  Maximilian Pallauf; Thomas Herrmann; David Oswald; Peter Törzsök; Susanne Deininger; Lukas Lusuardi
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.309

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.