Literature DB >> 31563194

Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Surgery.

Neeraj Panchal1, Laith Mahmood2, Armando Retana3, Robert Emery3.   

Abstract

Dynamic navigation (DN) has been used by many fields previously and recently applied to dental implant surgery. DN allows the implant surgeon to evaluate a patient, scan the patient, plan the implant position, and perform the implant surgery in the same day without the delay or cost of fabrication of a static surgical guide stent. The current DN workflow requires (1) cone-beam computed tomography with fiducials, (2) virtual implant planning, (3) calibration, and (4) implant placement in accordance to the 3-D image on the navigation screen. This technology allows for improved precision and accuracy in the placement of dental implants.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cone-beam computer tomography; Dental implant navigation; Dental implant surgery; Dental navigation

Year:  2019        PMID： 31563194     DOI： 10.1016/j.coms.2019.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am        ISSN： 1042-3699            Impact factor:   2.802


  10 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adrià Jorba-García; Albert González-Barnadas; Octavi Camps-Font; Rui Figueiredo; Eduard Valmaseda-Castellón
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation for Non-Surgical Endodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Egle Marija Jonaityte; Goda Bilvinaite; Saulius Drukteinis; Andres Torres
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Role of Navigation in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Surgeon's Perspectives.

Authors:  Manish Anand; Shreya Panwar
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2021-04-15

4.  Comparison of implant placement accuracy in two different preoperative digital workflows: navigated vs. pilot-drill-guided surgery.

Authors:  Johannes Spille; Feilu Jin; Christian Flörke; Jörg Wiltfang; Eleonore Behrens; Yahya Açil; Jürgen Lichtenstein; Hendrik Naujokat; Aydin Gülses
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-04-30

5.  A novel application of dynamic guided navigation system in immediate implant placement.

Authors:  Po-Jan Kuo; Chi-Yu Lin; Tsung-Fu Hung; Hsien-Chung Chiu; Hsin-Yu Kuo
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 2.080

6.  The influence of cone beam computed tomography on IRIS-100 implant navigation system.

Authors:  Pei-Ling Lai; Meng-Chen Lee; Chih-Te Liu; Po-Sung Fu; Ting-Hsun Lan; Jen-Chyan Wang; Chun-Cheng Hung
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.719

7.  Accuracy of intraoral real-time navigation versus static, CAD/CAM-manufactured pilot drilling guides in dental implant surgery: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Robert Stünkel; Alexander-Nicolai Zeller; Thomas Bohne; Florian Böhrnsen; Edris Wedi; David Raschke; Philipp Kauffmann
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-10-06

8.  Influence of experience on dental implant placement: an in vitro comparison of freehand, static guided and dynamic navigation approaches.

Authors:  Xiaotong Wang; Eman Shaheen; Sohaib Shujaat; Jan Meeus; Paul Legrand; Pierre Lahoud; Maurício do Nascimento Gerhardt; Constantinus Politis; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-10-10

9.  Registration-free workflow for electromagnetic and optical navigation in orbital and craniofacial surgery.

Authors:  R Schreurs; F Baan; C Klop; L Dubois; L F M Beenen; P E M H Habets; A G Becking; T J J Maal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Reliability and accuracy of dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement.

Authors:  Yiqun Wu; Baoxin Tao; Kengliang Lan; Yihan Shen; Wei Huang; Feng Wang
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 5.021
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.