Literature DB >> 31562999

Mechanisms of arsenic assimilation by plants and countermeasures to attenuate its accumulation in crops other than rice.

Enrica Allevato1, Silvia Rita Stazi2, Rosita Marabottini1, Alessandro D'Annibale1.   

Abstract

Arsenic is a ubiquitous metalloid in the biosphere, and its origin can be either geogenic or anthropic. Four oxidation states (-3, 0, +3 and + 5) characterize organic and inorganic As- compounds. Although arsenic is reportedly a toxicant, its harmful effects are closely related to its chemical form: inorganic compounds are most toxic, followed by organic ones and finally by arsine gas. Although drinking water is the primary source of arsenic exposure to humans, the metalloid enters the food chain through its uptake by crops, the extent of which is tightly dependent on its phytoavailability. Arsenate is taken up by roots via phosphate carriers, while arsenite is taken up by a subclass of aquaporins (NIP), some of which involved in silicon (Si) transport. NIP and Si transporters are also involved in the uptake of methylated forms of As. Once taken up, its distribution is regulated by the same type of transporters albeit with mobility efficiencies depending on As forms and its accumulation generally occurs in the following decreasing order: roots > stems > leaves > fruits (seeds). Besides providing a survey on the uptake and transport mechanisms in higher plants, this review reports on measures able to reducing plant uptake and the ensuing transfer into edible parts. On the one hand, these measures include a variety of plant-based approaches including breeding, genetic engineering of transport systems, graft/rootstock combinations, and mycorrhization. On the other hand, they include agronomic practices with a particular focus on the use of inorganic and organic amendments, treatment of irrigation water, and fertilization.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arsenic; Bioaccessibility; Bioavailability; Food contamination; Mitigation strategies; Plant uptake

Year:  2019        PMID: 31562999     DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf        ISSN: 0147-6513            Impact factor:   6.291


  3 in total

Review 1.  From classic methodologies to application of nanomaterials for soil remediation: an integrated view of methods for decontamination of toxic metal(oid)s.

Authors:  Lilian Rodrigues Rosa Souza; Luiza Carolina Pomarolli; Márcia Andreia Mesquita Silva da Veiga
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Toxic Metals (As, Cd, Ni, Pb) Impact in the Most Common Medicinal Plant (Mentha piperita).

Authors:  Cristina Dinu; Stefania Gheorghe; Anda Gabriela Tenea; Catalina Stoica; Gabriela-Geanina Vasile; Roxana Luisa Popescu; Ecaterina Anca Serban; Luoana Florentina Pascu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  Water and soil contaminated by arsenic: the use of microorganisms and plants in bioremediation.

Authors:  Philippe N Bertin; Simona Crognale; Frédéric Plewniak; Fabienne Battaglia-Brunet; Simona Rossetti; Michel Mench
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.223

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.