Literature DB >> 31562143

Prevalence of overweight and obesity and associated risk factors among adult residents of northwest China: a cross-sectional study.

Ning Song1,2, Fen Liu1,2, Min Han1,2, Qiang Zhao1,2, Qian Zhao1,2, Hui Zhai1,2, Xiang-Mei Li1,2, Guo-Li Du1,2, Xiao-Mei Li3,2, Yi-Ning Yang3,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Overweight and obesity have been shown to be related to multiple chronic conditions, leading to a heavy economic burden on society throughout the world. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of overweight and obesity and determine potential influencing factors among adults in Xinjiang, northwest China.
DESIGN: A community-based observational study.
SETTING: The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University.
METHODS: In total, 14 618 adult participants (7799 males; 6819 females) aged over 35 years were recruited from the Cardiovascular Risk Survey conducted in 2010. Data were obtained from face-to-face interviews and physical examinations. The sample was used to estimate the prevalence of overweight (body mass index (BMI) 24-28 kg/m2) and obesity (BMI ≥28 kg/m2) in Xinjiang Province. Influencing factors were analysed based on statistical methods.
RESULTS: In Xinjiang Province, the overall prevalence of overweight was 36.5% (male 40.1%; female 33.4%), and the prevalence of obesity was 26.5% (male 27.2%; female 25.8%). The prevalence of both overweight and obesity were higher in women than in men (p<0.001). The main influencing factors for overweight and obesity were sex, age, race, marital status, education level, occupation, smoking, drinking, hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidaemia (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: This study estimated that the prevalence of overweight and obesity among adult residents of Xinjiang Province, northwest China, was high. These data suggest that efforts related to the prevention and control of overweight and obesity should be a public health priority in northwest China. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cross-sectional survey; obesity; overweight; risk factors

Year:  2019        PMID: 31562143      PMCID: PMC6773337          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


The survey sample was demographically representative of Uyghur adults with obesity who are aged 35–80 years and reside in Xinjiang. The main strengths of our study are its large sample size and precise physical measurements, which increase the validity of our results. Due to the cross-sectional nature of the study and the self-designed questionnaire, indicators and experience could have been affected by bias. Moreover, other indicators of adiposity, such as body-fat percentage and waist circumference, were not obtained in our study. The results were from Xinjiang only and therefore cannot be generalised to all of China.

Introduction

Obesity is a complex chronic global disease affecting people worldwide across all ages, sexes, ethnicities and nationalities, and it is the fifth leading cause of mortality globally.1 2 According to WHO, the prevalence of worldwide obesity has doubled in >70 countries since 1980.3 Moreover, this trend has continuously increased in most other countries. In 2013, in order to draw physicians’ attention to the condition, the American Medical Association classified obesity as a disease.4 Body mass index (BMI), which is calculated as weight/height squared (kg/m2), is a common and accepted measure that is used to report obesity rates. While BMI is not a true measure of adiposity, it is simple to use in health screenings and epidemiological surveys.5 According to WHO, obesity is defined as a BMI ≥30 kg/m2, and overweight as a BMI of 25–30 kg/m2.6 For Chinese people, a BMI ≥28 kg/m2 suggests obesity and a BMI of 24–28 kg/m2 indicates overweight.7 China is the largest low-income and middle-income country and has the largest population in the world. With rapid economic growth and changes in lifestyle, such as dietary habits and physical activity,8 the epidemiological data indicate that individuals with overweight and obesity have a higher prevalence of traditional diseases, including dyslipidaemia, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, insulin resistance or diabetes, fatty liver disease and psychosocial complications and some cancers.5 9 Located in northwest China, Xinjiang is an autonomous minority ethnic region within the People’s Republic of China, and one of the fastest developing regions in China. It is the largest Chinese administrative division and spans over 1.66 million km2, which represents approximately one-sixth of the country’s territory. A few studies had reported the prevalence of overweight among adults in Xinjiang.10 Nevertheless, the samples in the above-mentioned studies were small, and those results cannot accurately represent the status of overweight and obesity in the whole region of Xinjiang. In the present study, we estimated the prevalence of overweight and obesity in Xinjiang, northwestern part of China. Furthermore, we investigated the associated factors of overweight and obesity, which will be regarded as a reference for policy makers to make informed decisions.

Materials and methods

Ethics approval

Written informed consent was acquired from each participant prior to enrolment.

Study design and population

This survey is a population-based cross-sectional programme and the Cardiovascular Risk Survey (CRS) study was conducted in Xinjiang Province of China in 2010. Previously, several studies had described in details.11–14 The CRS was a prospective, multiple-ethnicity and community-based observational study designed to investigate the prevalence and risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the Han, Uygur and Kazakh populations in Xinjiang Province.11 All participants we recruited had lived in Xinjiang for >1 year. In short, a total of 16 460 adults aged ≥35 years joined the CRS, 14 618 subjects (5757 Han, 4767 Uygur and 4094 Kazakh Chinese) of them completed the investigation. We adopt the method of multistage stratified sampling to randomly select the representative sample from six different administrative regions, including Urumqi, Yili, Hetian, Kelamayi, Fukang and Turpan.

Data collection

The standard survey mainly consisted of two aspects,15 one is the face-to-face interview, the other is the physical examination. Before launching the regular survey, it is necessary to carry out a presurvey to ensure the accuracy and feasibility of the questionnaire. At the investigation stage, two independent investigators ensured the validity of every survey questionnaire. In the questionnaire processing stage, we used parallel double method to handle data, and carried out three validations to verify the self-contradictory responses. The questionnaire provided demographics, general personal information and medical histories.16 Height and weight were measured adopting the standards. Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm, and weight was measured with a standard scale in the upright position to the nearest 0.1 kg.15 Smoking and drinking habits were self-reported. Blood samples were collected in examination centres at local hospitals in the participants’ residential area. The collected and detected methods have also been described in detail previously.13 14 At the time of the in-person interview, a 5 mL fasting venous blood was collected into EDTA tubes and separated to acquire plasma within 4 hours. Finally, all samples after processing were stored at −80℃ immediately. We measured the biochemical markers in plasma using the equipment for chemical analysis (Dimension AR/AVL Clinical Chemistry System, Newark, New Jersey, USA), operated by the Clinical Laboratory Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University. Relevant markers in plasma, which contained total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), were measured.

Definition of variables

Overweight and obesity were defined by the Chinese standards mentioned in the ‘Introduction’ section. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥28 kg/m2 and overweight was defined as a BMI of 24–28 kg/m2. Education was classified into four levels: primary school and below (including never having attended school and elementary schooling only); junior middle school; senior middle school (including secondary vocational schooling); undergraduate and above (including postsecondary vocational schooling, master’s degree and doctoral degree). The occupations consist of three parts: manual labour (including farmers, production and service workers), white-collar occupations (including office and other technical employment) and other occupations (including unemployed, retiree, student and full-time homemaker).17 Smoking-status classifications included current smokers (who had smoked at least one cigarette a day over the past 30 days) and never-smokers. Drinking-status classifications included current drinkers (who had consumed more than one alcoholic drink a week) and never-drinkers. Hypertension was defined as mean systolic blood pressure (BP) ≥140 mm Hg, mean diastolic BP ≥90 mm Hg and/or current use of antihypertensive medications.14 18 Diabetes was defined as fasting plasma glucose ≥126 mg/dL (≥7.0 mmol/L), self-reported history of diabetes and/or current use of insulin or antidiabetic medications.14 19 Hypercholesterolaemia was defined as serum TC level >6.22 mmol/L (240 mg/dL) and hypertriglyceridaemia was defined as serum TG level >2.26 mmol/L (200 mg/dL). A serum LDL-C level of >4.14 mmol/L (160 mg/dL) was defined as high LDL-C, and a serum HDL-C level of <1.04 mmol/L (40 mg/dL) was defined as low HDL-C. In total, dyslipidaemia was defined as the existence of at least one of the four abnormal lipid concentrations mentioned above or self-reported use of lipid-lowering drugs.13 20

Statistical analysis

Data were entered and corrected by two staff members using EpiData 3.02 software (EpiData, Association, Odense, Denmark). The subjects’ continuous variables were expressed by frequency distributions, meanwhile, the prevalence rates were shown through the percentage; χ2 test was used to compare the prevalence of overweight and obesity in different groups. To analyse the factors associated with obesity and adjust for potential confounding effects, multivariable logistic regression analyses were carried out to explain independent factors associated with overweight and obesity. ORs with 95% CIs were used for the risk analysis. All statistical analyses were conducted using the complex sampling function of Social Sciences SPSS for Windows V.22.0 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA), with a p<0.05 indicating statistical significance.

Patient and public involvement

This survey is a population-based cross-sectional programme and the CRS study was conducted in Xinjiang Province of China in 2010. The study was designed to investigate the prevalence of overweight and obesity among adult residents in Xinjiang in northwest China. However, no patients or members of the public were included in the design, recruitment or conduct of the study. The results were to be disseminated to participants after the study was completed by the study team. The burden of intervention would not be assessed by the patients themselves.

Results

In this survey, we interviewed 14 618 residents aged 35–101 years (mean age: 50.8±12.6 years), including 6819 (46.6%) men and 7799 (53.4%) women. Among these participants, 5757 (39.4%) were Han, with a mean age of 52.5±12.7 years; 4767 (32.6%) were Uygur, with a mean age of 50.7±13.0 years and 4094 (28.0%) were Kazakh, with a mean age of 48.6±11.7 years. According to the BMI classification for Chinese people, the overall prevalence of overweight was 36.5% (male 40.1%; female 33.4%), and the prevalence of obesity was 26.5% (male 27.2%; female 25.8%) in Xinjiang Province (table 1). There were differences in age, area, race, occupation, education, marriage, drinking habits, hypertension history and plasma levels of TG and TC between the overweight and obesity groups, while there were no significant differences in sex, smoking, diabetes history and the level of LDL-C and HDL-C between the two groups.
Table 1

Prevalence of overweight and obesity according to demographic characteristics

CharacteristicNOverweightObesity
n (%)χ2 P valuen (%)χ2 P value
Sex
 Male68192735 (40.1)71.1<0.001*1856 (27.2)3.70.05
 Female77992603 (33.4)2013 (25.8)
Age (years)
 35–4454251866 (34.4)20.3<0.001*1146 (21.1)149.8<0.001*
 45–5437591441 (38.3)1153 (30.7)
 55–6429321067 (36.4)919 (31.3)
 ≥652502964 (38.5)651 (26.0)
Area
 Urban79743163 (39.7)75.1<0.001*1956 (24.5)33.9<0.001*
 Rural66442175 (32.7)1913 (28.8)
Ethnicity
 Han57572380 (16.3)99.1<0.001*1082 (7.4)331.9<0.001*
 Uygur47671635 (11.2)1361 (9.3)
 Kazakh40941323 (9.1)1426 (9.8)
Occupation
 Manual labour45831760 (12.0)12.10.002*1095 (7.5)32.1<0.001*
 White collar77512736 (18.7)2086 (14.3)
 Other2284842 (5.8)688 (4.7)
Education
 Primary school and below58051993 (13.6)26.9<0.001*1589 (10.87)21.2<0.001*
 Junior middle school30941196 (8.2)844 (5.8)
 Senior middle school45561676 (11.5)1191 (8.2)
 Undergraduate and above1163473 (3.2)245 (1.7)
Marriage
 Unmarried19259 (0.4)14.1<0.001*27 (0.2)23.1<0.001*
 Married12 9884795 (32.8)3427 (23.4)
 Divorced20153 (0.4)47 (0.2)
 Widowed1237431 (3.0)368 (2.5)
Drinking
 Yes4169923 (6.3)44.5<0.001*663 (4.5)24.6<0.001*
 No10 4494415 (30.2)3206 (21.9)
Smoking
 Yes21511688 (11.6)39.7<0.001*1101 (7.5)0.010.92
 No12 4673650 (25.0)2768 (18.9)
Hypertension
 Yes57012138 (14.6)3.90.052155 (14.7)616.8<0.001*
 No89173200 (21.9)1714 (11.7)
Diabetes
 Yes859335 (2.3)2.40.1317 (2.2)51.0<0.001*
 No13 7595003 (34.2)3552 (24.3)
Dyslipidaemia
 Hypertriglyceridaemia
  Yes41131724 (11.8)72.0<0.001*1497 (10.2)289.9<0.001*
  No10 5053614 (24.7)2372 (16.2)
 Hypercholesterolaemia
  Yes37871469 (10.1)11.40.001*1267 (8.7)128.3<0.001*
  No10 8313869 (26.5)2602 (17.8)
High LDL-C
 Yes52511921 (13.1)0.020.91334 (9.1)4.80.03*
 No93673417 (23.4)2535 (17.3)
Low HDL-C
 Yes44371704 (11.7)9.80.002*1215 (8.3)2.80.09
 No10 8313634 (24.9)2654 (18.2)

Categorical variables are presented as counts and percentages. Data were compared by χ2 tests.

*P<0.05, statistically significant.

HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol.

Prevalence of overweight and obesity according to demographic characteristics Categorical variables are presented as counts and percentages. Data were compared by χ2 tests. *P<0.05, statistically significant. HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol. From the age-stratified and gender-stratified results in table 2, for men, the prevalence of both overweight and obesity peaked at 45–54 years, while a significant trend indicating an increase in the prevalence of overweight with age was not demonstrated. For women, the prevalence of overweight and obesity increased with age, peaking at 55–64 years, although there was a slight decrease at ≥65 years. In addition, a higher proportion of enrolled males were overweight than females. Interestingly, the proportion of females who were obese was higher than that of males.
Table 2

Prevalence of overweight and obesity in men and women according to age group

Age(years)OverweightP valueObesityP value
Male (%)Female (%)Male (%)Female (%)
35–44994 (40.2)872 (29.5)<0.001631 (25.5)515 (17.4)<0.001
45–54735 (43.1)706 (34.4)517 (30.3)636 (31.0)
55–64476 (35.8)591 (36.8)389 (29.3)531 (33.0)
≥65530 (40.3)434 (36.5)319 (24.3)332 (27.9)

Date were compared by χ2 tests.

*P<0.05, statistically significant.

Prevalence of overweight and obesity in men and women according to age group Date were compared by χ2 tests. *P<0.05, statistically significant. From the age-stratified and race-stratified results in table 3, as a whole, obesity prevalence was found to be the highest among the Kazakh participants and the lowest among Han participants. The differences among the three ethnic groups were statistically significant (p<0.001). Furthermore, overweight prevalence was also significantly different among the three ethnicities, with the highest rate among Han participants and the lowest among Kazakh participants.
Table 3

Prevalence of overweight and obesity in Han, Uyghur and Kazakh according to age group

Age(years)OverweightP valueObesityP value
Han (%)Uygur (%)Kazakh (%)Han (%)Uygur (%)Kazakh (%)
35–44712 (35.0)573 (34.6)581 (33.6)<0.001273 (13.4)422 (25.5)451 (26.1)<0.001
45–54599 (43.9)481 (38.1)361 (31.9)246 (18.0)436 (34.5)471 (41.6)
55–64497 (45.9)354 (32.6)216 (28.3)268 (24.7)318 (29.3)333 (43.6)
≥65572 (45.0)227 (29.9)165 (35.1)295 (23.2)185 (24.3)171 (36.4)

Date were compared by χ2 tests.

*P<0.05, statistically significant.

Prevalence of overweight and obesity in Han, Uyghur and Kazakh according to age group Date were compared by χ2 tests. *P<0.05, statistically significant. We divided the participants into two groups: normal weight and overweight/obese. Table 1 shows that the following factors all had a significant effect on overweight/obese: age, area, race, education, marital status, occupation, drinking, hypertension and dyslipidaemia (p<0.05). We applied multivariable unconditional logistic regression analysis to all of the identified risk factors and attempted to identify any existing differences in these risk factors that could explain the difference in overweight and obesity prevalence. Table 4 shows the results of logistic regression models comparing the prevalence of the potential risk factors: sex, age, area, marriage status, occupation, smoking, drinking, hypertension, diabetes and level of dyslipidaemia, including hypercholesterolaemia, hypertriglyceridaemia and low HDL-C. The multivariable logistic regression results reveal that female adults were more likely to become overweight and obese than male adults (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7 to 0.8). We categorised age into four groups, which clearly showed that increasing age was a risk factor for overweight/obesity, especially age 45–54 years (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.6). Among the three ethnic groups, the Kazakh participants (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.5 to 1.8) and Uygur participants (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.6) were at higher risk of becoming overweight and obese. Participants who were married (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.5) or widowed (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.5) were more likely to be overweight/obese than those who were unmarried. In addition, smokers (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.8 to 0.9) were less likely to become overweight and obese than non-smokers. Participants who drank were more likely to become overweight or obese than those who never or rarely drank (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.6). Overweight and obesity were more common among those who had hypertension (OR 2.1, 95% CI 2.0 to 2.3) and diabetes (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.6) compared with those who had no hypertension and diabetes history. In the overweight and obese group, hypertriglyceridaemia (OR 2.4, 95% CI 2.2 to 2.7), hypercholesterolaemia (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.3) and low HDL-C (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.2) remained risk factors.
Table 4

Multivariable regression analysis of correlates of overweight and obesity in residents of Xinjiang Province

CharacteristicBSEWalddfP valueOR95% CI
Area−0.10.0410.410.001*0.90.8 to 0.9
Sex−0.30.0532.51<0.001*0.80.7 to 0.8
Ethnicity94.42<0.001*
 Han1
 Uygur0.40.0550.01<0.001*1.41.3 to 1.6
 Kazakh0.500.0586.21<0.001*1.71.5 to 1.8
Age (years)71.23<0.001*
 35–441
 45–540.40.0562.81<0.001*1.51.3 to 1.6
 55–640.30.0524.61<0.001*1.31.2 to 1.5
 ≥650.10.063.110.081.111.0 to 1.3
Education17.93<0.001*
 Primary school and below1
 Junior middle school0.20.0515.61<0.001*1.21.1 to 1.4
 Senior middle school0.20.067.010.008*1.21.0 to 1.3
 Undergraduate and above0.20.086.810.009*1.31.1 to 1.5
Occupation10.420.006*
 Manual labour1
 White collar0.010.050.0410.81.00.9 to 1.1
 Other0.20.067.910.005*1.21.1 to 1.4
Marriage26.53<0.001
 Unmarried1
 Married0.60.215.51<0.001*1.81.4 to 2.5
 Divorced0.10.20.210.71.10.7 to 1.7
 Widowed0.60.212.41<0.001*1.81.3 to 2.5
Smoking−0.20.059.010.003*0.90.8 to 0.9
Drinking0.40.0634.81<0.001*1.51.3 to 1.6
Hypertension0.80.04340.41<0.001*2.12.0 to 2.3
Diabetes0.30.0910.410.001*1.31.1 to 1.6
Dyslipidaemia
 Hypertriglyceridaemia0.90.05371.41<0.001*2.42.2 to 2.7
 Hypercholesterolaemia0.20.0520.91<0.001*1.21.1 to 1.3
 Low HDL-C0.10.046.410.01*1.11.0 to 1.2
 High LDL-C0.020.040.1610.691.00.9 to 1.1
Constant−1.00.235.31<0.001

*P<0.05, statistically significant.

Multivariable regression analysis of correlates of overweight and obesity in residents of Xinjiang Province *P<0.05, statistically significant.

Discussion

The epidemic of obesity is one of the most important health problems worldwide and is estimated to be the second leading cause of preventable death in high-income countries, behind cigarette smoking.21 22 The prevalence of overweight and obesity continues to increase around the world, as have associated comorbidities and healthcare costs.23 In the USA, the prevalence of obesity accounts for one-third of the general population, and another one-third is overweight.24 The China Chronic Disease Survey conducted by the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention demonstrated that the prevalence of overweight among Chinese adults (aged 18–64 years) in 2007 and 2010 was 26.6% and 30.6%, respectively (males, 27.4% and 32.1%; females, 25.7% and 29.1%), and the prevalence of obesity was 7.7% and 12.1%, respectively (males, 6.7% and 12.5%; females, 8.7% and 11.1%).15 We found that the prevalence of both overweight and obesity was high. Our cross-sectional study indicates that the prevalence of overweight and obesity among adults in northwest China was 36.5% (males, 40.1%; females, 33.4%) and 26.5% (males, 27.2%; females, 25.8%), respectively. In the Russian population,25 the prevalence of overweight was 64.6% (males, 42.3%; females, 28.7%), and approximately one-third of the participants (30.3%) were obese (males, 27.5%; females, 31.4%). Contrary to what was observed in our research, the prevalence of overweight was higher than obesity in that study. This implies that overweight and obesity have a higher prevalence in both sexes and are more common in northwest China and Russia than in other areas, although effective actions might have been taken to control the upward trend.26 The prevalence of underweight (according to Chinese standards, underweight reflects <18.5 kg/m2) was significantly different among the ethnic groups (p<0.05) (online supplementary table 1). However, due to the special dietary habits (high-sugar and high-fat diet) and living habits in Xinjiang, the number of low-weight people was too small to reliably detect differences. In this study, we found that the prevalence of both overweight and obesity was high in middle age (45–64 years). Similarly, age gradients in the prevalence of obesity have been found in Russia.26 It is worth noting that more than half of all women aged 55–64 years were obese, and nearly 80% of men in the group aged 45–54 years were overweight or obese, which is consistent with our age gradients. Chinese people are more likely to have positive perceptions of obesity because it is considered good fortune to become fat during middle age in traditional Chinese culture.27 Moreover, a large segment of the middle-aged and older adult population will be living with overweight and obesity, which is associated with additional health impairments.28 Through the present study, we found a very high prevalence of overweight and obesity in three ethnicities in Xinjiang, and there is no doubt that this result is similar to those observed in the previous study conducted in Xinjiang.10 In addition, the prevalence rate of obesity was significantly different among Han, Uygur and Kazakh groups, as the prevalence in the Kazakh group was significantly higher compared with the Han and Uygur groups. Overall, our findings indicate that 16.3% of Han, 11.2% of Uygur and 9.1% of Kazakh people >35 years of age in Xinjiang were overweight and that 7.4% of Han, 9.3% of Uygur and 9.8% of Kazakh people were obese. Xinjiang is a multiethnic co-populated area in China. The national census showed that there are 47 ethnicities in Xinjiang, and 13 of them are confirmed to be native ethnicities, such as the Uygur and Kazakh. Explanations for this increase in prevalence are as follows: first, Kazakh people live in the grasslands and forests, and their dietary habits are characterised by eating more animals and consuming fewer fresh vegetables. Second, the Kazakh group is a nomadic ethnicity, the members of which usually live in hypoxic areas and at high altitude where the climate is cold and dry. Third, differences in genetic background may be an important factor underlying the differences in the prevalence of obesity.29 Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the prevalence of overweight and obesity was related to several factors. A previous review revealed that various marital transitions are related with changes in body weight: transition into marriage appears to be associated with weight gain, whereas transition out of marriage is associated with weight loss.30 Our study found a similar result, namely, that marriage-related transitions, including marrying, divorcing and being widowed, are risk factors for becoming overweight and obese. A plausible explanation is that behaviours and lifestyles differ among married and unmarried individuals, but the exact mechanism underlying this association with marriage status is not clear. In our study, we also found that different educational levels, occupations and areas of residence are closely related to body weight. We observed that a low education level is a risk factor because of insufficient levels of cognition. Urban populations, especially the unemployed, retirees, students and full-time housewives, are more likely to become overweight and obese, which may be attributable to urban working conditions, for example, sitting in an office and living a fast-paced life as well as supermarket or fast-food restaurant availability.31 The 2015 Global Burden of Disease Study, representing 195 countries and territories, estimated that 25.0% of men and 5.4% of women worldwide smoked daily, which is the leading preventable cause of death worldwide.32 In this study, we found a lower prevalence of overweight and obesity in smokers than in non-smokers, which is consistent with studies conducted in Switzerland, India and Jilin, China.15 33 34 In addition, reasonable explanations illustrate the issue based on two different criteria. Using tobacco is associated with the function of multiple systems, especially that of cardiovascular and digestive systems.35 In terms of the organism itself, smoking has been considered to be a method of relieving stress and anxiety. In northwest China in particular, it is generally believed that the more you drink, the more weight you gain. Wang et al 15 found results consistent with this belief. To the best of our knowledge, obesity is an independent risk factor for both CVD and death.36–38 We explored whether the prevalence of overweight and obesity is higher among subjects with hypertension or diabetes or dyslipidaemia. The results provide a compelling reason why the occurrence of obesity is combined with cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidaemia. Previous studies reported that the benefits of weight loss are well established, with a 5%–10% reduction in weight associated with improvements in health and quality of life and a 3% reduction being positive for health improvement when maintained.39 Relevant departments should heed the high prevalence of overweight and obesity in Xinjiang Province and provide effective guidelines to help to reverse the trend. The main strengths of our study are its large sample size and precise physical measurements, which increase the validity of our results. However, the present study has several limitations. First, the main limitation is the cross-sectional design, which prohibits inferring a causal link between overweight and obesity and risk factors. As in cross-sectional studies, data on exposure and outcome are gathered simultaneously at a specific time point. Prospective studies are necessary to confirm our findings. In addition, self-reported data and the nature of cross-sectional data may lead to recall and reporting biases, which may be the reason for the non-significant difference in the causes of obesity. Finally, other indicators of adiposity, such as body-fat percentage and waist circumference, which many studies have noted reflect the prevalence of overweight, obesity and body-fat distribution, were not obtained in our study.40 41

Conclusions

In conclusion, the present study indicates that the prevalence of overweight and obesity among adult residents in Xinjiang in northwest China has been very high during the past years. Furthermore, the main influencing factors for overweight and obesity are sex, age, race, marital status, education level, occupation, smoking, drinking, hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidaemia. These data suggest that efforts related to the prevention and control of overweight and obesity should be a public health priority in the northwest of China. These findings will be submitted to relevant departments as a reference for efforts to reverse these trends.
  41 in total

1.  NICE hypertension guideline 2011: evidence based evolution.

Authors:  Richard J McManus; Mark Caulfield; Bryan Williams
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-01-13

2.  Comparison of the association of predicted fat mass, body mass index, and other obesity indicators with type 2 diabetes risk: two large prospective studies in US men and women.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Lee; NaNa Keum; Frank B Hu; E John Orav; Eric B Rimm; Walter C Willett; Edward L Giovannucci
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Two-Year Changes in Child Weight Status, Diet, and Activity by Neighborhood Nutrition and Physical Activity Environment.

Authors:  Brian E Saelens; Karen Glanz; Lawrence D Frank; Sarah C Couch; Chuan Zhou; Trina Colburn; James F Sallis
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.002

4.  The Association between Marital Transitions, Body Mass Index, and Weight: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Lauren Dinour; May May Leung; Gina Tripicchio; Sahar Khan; Ming-Chin Yeh
Journal:  J Obes       Date:  2012-09-20

5.  Impact of an intensive lifestyle intervention on use and cost of medical services among overweight and obese adults with type 2 diabetes: the action for health in diabetes.

Authors:  Mark A Espeland; Henry A Glick; Alain Bertoni; Frederick L Brancati; George A Bray; Jeanne M Clark; Jeffrey M Curtis; Caitlin Egan; Mary Evans; John P Foreyt; Siran Ghazarian; Edward W Gregg; Helen P Hazuda; James O Hill; Don Hire; Edward S Horton; Van S Hubbard; John M Jakicic; Robert W Jeffery; Karen C Johnson; Steven E Kahn; Tina Killean; Abbas E Kitabchi; William C Knowler; Andrea Kriska; Cora E Lewis; Marsha Miller; Maria G Montez; Anne Murillo; David M Nathan; Ebenezer Nyenwe; Jennifer Patricio; Anne L Peters; Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Henry Pownall; J Bruce Redmon; Julia Rushing; Donna H Ryan; Monika Safford; Adam G Tsai; Thomas A Wadden; Rena R Wing; Susan Z Yanovski; Ping Zhang
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 6.  Association of all-cause mortality with overweight and obesity using standard body mass index categories: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Katherine M Flegal; Brian K Kit; Heather Orpana; Barry I Graubard
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Prevalence of obesity and abdominal obesity in the Lausanne population.

Authors:  Pedro Marques-Vidal; Murielle Bochud; Vincent Mooser; Fred Paccaud; Gérard Waeber; Peter Vollenweider
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Prevalence of obesity and overweight and associated factors among financial institution workers in Accra Metropolis, Ghana: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Prince N O Addo; Kofi M Nyarko; Samuel O Sackey; Patricia Akweongo; Bismark Sarfo
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-10-23

9.  Simple vs. Complex Carbohydrate Dietary Patterns and the Global Overweight and Obesity Pandemic.

Authors:  Fabrizio Ferretti; Michele Mariani
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).

Authors:  Melanie J Davies; David A D'Alessio; Judith Fradkin; Walter N Kernan; Chantal Mathieu; Geltrude Mingrone; Peter Rossing; Apostolos Tsapas; Deborah J Wexler; John B Buse
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  5 in total

1.  MALAT1 gene rs600231 polymorphism positively associated with acute coronary syndrome in Chinese population: a case-control study.

Authors:  Ning Song; Jun-Yi Luo; Qian Zhao; Jin-Yu Zhang; Fen Liu; Xiao-Mei Li; Yi-Ning Yang
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-04

2.  Effectiveness of a Program Based on Telehealth in Nutritional Knowledge and Body Mass Index in Peruvian University Teachers.

Authors:  Jacksaint Saintila; Saulo A Salinas Arias; Yaquelin E Calizaya-Milla; Roussel Dávila Villavicencio; Antonio J Castellanos-Vazquez; Joel Turpo-Chaparro; Junior I Pacheco-Espinoza; Ana K Apaéstegui-Huamán; Salomón Huancahuire-Vega; Percy G Ruiz Mamani
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

3.  Influence of Obesity on Heart Rate Variability in Nurses with Age and Shift Type as Moderators.

Authors:  Wen-Pei Chang; Chia-Hui Wang; Yen-Kuang Lin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Heat maps of cardiovascular disease risk factor clustering among community-dwelling older people in Xinjiang: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Wenwen Xiao; Aishanjiang Wumaer; Zhuoya Maimaitiwusiman; Jinling Liu; Saiyare Xuekelati; Hongmei Wang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  Obesity and Heath-Carter Somatotyping of 3438 Adults in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China by Multivariate Analysis.

Authors:  Guochang Xu; Guojian Zhou; Quanying Qu; Ying Hu; Yueriguli Saitierding; Maierdanjang Mohetaer; Yeerkenbieke Buerlan; Xuejun Zhong; Huanjiu Xi; Xiaoyuan Liu; Wenhui Li; Youfeng Wen
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 3.168

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.