| Literature DB >> 31561551 |
Xue Jun Li1, Peter Han Joo Chong2.
Abstract
Smart cities require interactive management of water supply networks and water meters play an important role in such a task. As compared to fully mechanical water meters, electromechanical water meters or fully electronic water meters can collect real-time information through automatic meter reading (AMR), which makes them more suitable for smart cities applications. In this paper, we first study the design principles of existing water meters, and then present our design and implementation of a self-powered smart water meter. The proposed water meter is based on a water turbine generator, which serves for two purposes: (i) to sense the water flow through adaptive signal processing performed on the generated voltage; and (ii) to produce electricity to charge batteries for the smart meter to function properly. In particular, we present the design considerations and implementation details. The wireless transceiver is integrated in the proposed water meter so that it can provide real-time water flow information. In addition, a mobile phone application is designed to provide a user with a convenient tool for water usage monitoring.Entities:
Keywords: automatic meter reading; energy harvesting; flow measurement; smart city; water meter
Year: 2019 PMID: 31561551 PMCID: PMC6806621 DOI: 10.3390/s19194177
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Comparison of water meters.
| Types | Advantages | Drawbacks |
|---|---|---|
| Fully Mechanical | simple design, low cost | narrow measurement range, reduced accuracy at low flow rates |
| Electromechanical | real-time information | requires extra protection for the electronic component |
| Fully Electronic | high accuracy, | requires extra waterproof protection and power supply |
Figure 1(a) single jet meters; (b) multiple jet meters.
Figure 2(a) electromagnetic meters; (b) fluidic effect meters.
Figure 3Block diagram of the smart meter.
Figure 4(a) outlook of the water turbine generator; (b) rotor; (c) stator and its corresponding wire windings as nine coils; (d) rotor bearing.
Figure 5(a) magnet layout of water turbine generator; (b) block magnet model.
Figure 6Water flow.
Water usage profile in Auckland, New Zealand.
| Summer | Winter | |
|---|---|---|
| Average | 179 lpd | 174 lpd |
| Median | 143 lpd | 130 lpd |
| Washing machine | 21% | 24% |
| Shower | 24% | 30% |
| Toilet | 18% | 19% |
| Tap | 11% | 16% |
| Leak | 4% | 2% |
| Outdoor | 17% | 6% |
| Bathtub | 2% | 1% |
| Dishwasher | 1% | 1% |
| Misc | 0% | 1% |
* lpd denotes litres per day.
Water daily usage time for different features (seconds).
| Feature | Summer | Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Bath | 11.93 | 34.8 |
| Shower | 429.6 | 261 |
| Sink | 98.5 | 92.8 |
| Laundry tub | 35.8 | 17.4 |
| Wishing Machine | 187.95 | 208.8 |
| Dishwasher | 8.95 | 8.7 |
| Toilet | 161.1 | 165.3 |
Available power from household water usage.
| Feature | Summer | Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 32.87 W | 37.92 W |
| Energy | 30,698.5 J | 29,841 J |
Figure 7Average daily household water usage profile [27] (Copyright 2010, BRANZ).
Figure 8Printed circuit board schematics.
Figure 9Voltage and frequency behavior of generated voltage.
Figure 10Voltage and flowrate relationships.
Figure 11Tacho meter measuring RPM of a turbine spun by a DC motor.
Figure 12Test results for voltage and RPM.
Figure 13Smart meter algorithm flowchart.
Comparison of smart water meters.
| Types | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| [ | simple design, reliable operation | customized design, external power supply |
| [ | self-powered, light-weight | indoor use only, small pipes |
| [ | self-powered, hybrid energy harvesting | complex design, large pipes only |
| [ | self-powered, simple design | requires pipe holes, limited reliability |
| [ | self-powered, IoT connectivity | requires pipe holes, large pipes only |
| [ | self-powered, realiable operation | complex design, separate energy harvesting unit |
| This Work | self-powered, scalable design | requires water proof, customized design |
Comparison of the proposed smart meter and traditional mechanical water meter.
| Types | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical Water Meter | simple design, reliable operation | requires manual reading |
| This Work | self-powered, scalable design | requires moisture protection |