| Literature DB >> 31561467 |
Tong Wang1, Xuan Zhang2, Zichao Wang3, Xiuzhong Zhu4,5, Jie Liu6, Xin Min7, Tao Cao8, Xiaodong Fan9.
Abstract
Stimuli-responsive conductive hydrogels have a wide range of applications due to their intelligent sensing of external environmental changes, which are important for smart switches, soft robotics, and flexible sensors. However, designing stimuli-responsive conductive hydrogels with logical operation, such as smart switches, remains a challenge. In this study, we synthesized pH-responsive conductive hydrogels, based on the copolymer network of acrylic acid and hydroxyethyl acrylate doped with graphene oxide. Using the good flexibility and conductivity of these hydrogels, we prepared a flexible sensor that can realize the intelligent analysis of human body motion signals. Moreover, the pH-responsive conductive hydrogels were integrated with temperature-responsive conductive hydrogels to develop logic gates with sensing, analysis, and driving functions, which realized the intellectualization of conductive hydrogels.Entities:
Keywords: composite hydrogels; flexible sensors; logic gates; pH-responsive; stimuli-responsive conductive hydrogels
Year: 2019 PMID: 31561467 PMCID: PMC6836247 DOI: 10.3390/polym11101564
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Schematic of Poly(acrylic acid-co-2-hydroxyethyl acrylate)/graphene oxide (P(AA-HEMA)/GO) hydrogels: the red segments are Poly(2-hydroxyethyl acrylate) (PHEMA), the green segments are Poly(acrylic acid)(PAA), and the blue segments are chemical crosslinking points.
Figure 2FTIR spectra of P(AA-HEMA)/GO hydrogels (black) and PAA hydrogels (red).
Figure 3SEM images of (a) PAA hydrogels and (b) P(AA-HEMA)/GO hydrogels.
Figure 4(a) The diameter of the hydrogels varies with an increase in pH from 2 to 8 (0.15 M Na2HPO4 and citric acid buffer solution). The yellow circles represent the coin and the black circles represent the hydrogel; (b) pH-dependent conducting properties for P(AA-HEMA)/GO and P(AA-HEMA) hydrogels; (c) electrical conductivity of the hydrogels with different GO ratios; (d) pH-dependent conducting properties for PHEMA/GO hydrogels without AA.
Figure 5Wearable flexible sensors based on P(AA-HEMA)/GO hydrogels. (a) the sensor for monitoring the motion of the fingers, the (related original resistance of the sensor) R0 was 1155 Ω; (b) the hydrogel sensors adhered to the gloves with the finger bending at different angles, the R0 was 1115 Ω; (c) the sensor for monitoring the motion of the wrist, the R0 was 1092 Ω; (d) pressing the hydrogel sensor to detect its sensitivity, the R0 was 6300 Ω; (e) stretching, the R0 was 3968 Ω; (f) twisting, the R0 was 5134 Ω. The size of the hydrogels in (a–c) were different from the size of the hydrogels in (d–f).
Figure 6The design of logic gates. Schemes illustrating (a) preparation of molds using polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS); (b) using power, a bulb, PDMS molds, and stimuli-responsive conductive hydrogels to form logic gates. The red rectangles represent temperature-responsive conductive hydrogels and the blue rectangles represent pH-responsive conductive hydrogels; (c) thedifferent states of the YES gates and the truth tables; (d) the different states of the AND gates and the truth tables; (e) the different states of the OR gates and the truth tables.