| Literature DB >> 31560825 |
Yonghong Yu1,2, Jianrong Ma1, Qiaoqiao Guo2, Jincheng Ma2, Haihong Wang2.
Abstract
Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc), the causal agent of black rot in crucifers, produces a membrane-bound yellow pigment called xanthomonadin to protect against photobiological and peroxidative damage, and uses a quorum-sensing mechanism mediated by the diffusible signal factor (DSF) family signals to regulate virulence factors production. The Xcc gene XCC4003, annotated as Xcc fabG3, is located in the pig cluster, which may be responsible for xanthomonadin synthesis. We report that fabG3 expression restored the growth of the Escherichia coli fabG temperature-sensitive mutant CL104 under non-permissive conditions. In vitro assays demonstrated that FabG3 catalyses the reduction of 3-oxoacyl-acyl carrier protein (ACP) intermediates in fatty acid synthetic reactions, although FabG3 had a lower activity than FabG1. Moreover, the fabG3 deletion did not affect growth or fatty acid composition. These results indicate that Xcc fabG3 encodes a 3-oxoacyl-ACP reductase, but is not essential for growth or fatty acid synthesis. However, the Xcc fabG3 knock-out mutant abolished xanthomonadin production, which could be only restored by wild-type fabG3, but not by other 3-oxoacyl-ACP reductase-encoding genes, indicating that Xcc FabG3 is specifically involved in xanthomonadin biosynthesis. Additionally, our study also shows that the Xcc fabG3-disrupted mutant affects Xcc virulence in host plants.Entities:
Keywords: 3-ketoacyl-acyl carrier protein reductase; Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris; xanthomonadin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31560825 PMCID: PMC6859482 DOI: 10.1111/mpp.12871
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Plant Pathol ISSN: 1364-3703 Impact factor: 5.663
Figure 1The reduced xanthomonadin production and H2O2 resistance of the Xcc YH1 (ΔfabG3) strain and restoration by Xcc fabG3. (A) Quantitative analysis of xanthomonadin production in Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc) strains. wt, wild‐type; fabG3, complemented with plasmid pSRK‐Km harbouring the gene Xcc fabG3; Xcc fabG1, complemented with plasmid pSRK‐Km harbouring the gene Xcc fabG1; Xcc fabG2, complemented with plasmid pSRK‐Km harbouring the gene Xcc fabG2; EcfabG, complemented with plasmid pSRK‐Km harbouring the gene Escherichia coli fabG; 3‐HBA, 3‐hydroxybenzoic acid. (B) Xcc cells with an optical density of 1.0 when measured at 600 nm were collected for H2O2 treatment. After 30 min of H2O2 treatment, the CFU value of each strain was determined on NYG plates. Values shown are the means ± standard deviations from three independent experiments. Different letters indicate significant difference between treatments based on the least significant difference at P = 0.05. (C) Diffusion plate assay showing the restoration of xanthomonadin production in ΔxanB2 following exposure to Xcc YH1(ΔfabG3) or 3‐HBA, and showing the failure to restore xanthomonadin production in Xcc YH1(ΔfabG3) following exposure to wide‐type, ΔxanB2 or 3‐HBA.
Figure 2Alignment of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc) FabG3 with Escherichia coli FabG (EcFabG) and Xcc FabG1. The two arginine residues thought to bind the acyl carrier protein (ACP) moiety are indicated by arrows and the catalytic triad residues are indicated by asterisks. The alignment was performed with ClustalW based on identical residues.
Figure 3Growth of Escherichia coli fabG (ts) mutant CL104 transformants containing plasmids carrying Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc) fabG3, Xcc fabG1 and E. coli fabG. (A) E. coli CL104 derivatives, carrying the pBAD24M‐derived plasmids pHWG (pBAD‐EcfabG), pYYH‐1 (pBAD‐Xcc fabG1) and pYYH‐2 (pBAD‐Xcc fabG3), were grown at 30 °C or 42 °C on LB plates in the presence of 0.01% arabinose. (B) Transformants of E. coli fabG (ts) mutant CL104 with pBAD24M‐derived plasmids grown in LB liquid containing 0.01% arabinose. Squares, CL104/pHWG (pBAD‐EcfabG); diamonds, CL104/pYYH‐1 (pBAD‐XccfabG1); triangles, CL104/pYYH‐2 (pBAD‐Xcc fabG3); empty circles, CL104/pBAD24M. Data are means ± standard deviations of three independent assays.
Figure 4Assay of the in vitro fatty acid synthesis abilities of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc) FabG3. (A) Function of Xcc FabG3 in the initial cycle of fatty acid synthesis. Lane 1, holo‐ACP; lane 2, reaction product containing E. coli FabG; lane 3, reaction product containing Xcc FabG3; lane 4, reaction product without 3‐ketoacyl‐ACP reductase. (B) Functions of Xcc XabG in the elongation cycle of fatty acid synthesis. Lane 1, product of octanoyl‐ACP synthesized by Vibrio harveyi AasS; lane 2, reaction product catalysed by E. coli FabG; lane 3, reaction product catalysed by Xcc FabG3; lane 4, product of decanoyl‐ACP synthesized by V. harveyi AasS. EcG, E. coli FabG; OAR, 3‐oxoacyl‐ACP reductase; EcFabH, E. coli 3‐ketoacyl‐ACP synthase III; EcFabZ, E. coli 3‐hydroxyacyl‐ACP dehydrase; EcFabI, E. coli enoyl‐ACP reductase.
Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc) FabG1 and Xcc FabG3 activities with various 3‐oxoacyl‐APCs*
| Substrate |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 3‐oxobutyryl ACP | 14.69 ± 0.75 c | 4.65 ± 0.44 c |
| 3‐oxohexanoyl ACP | 24.15 ± 2.06 a | 8.10 ± 0.89 a |
| 3‐oxoctanoyl ACP | 22.31 ± 1.91 a | 7.76 ± 0.97 b |
| 3‐oxodecanoyl ACP | 17.94 ± 1.68 b | 8.53 ± 1.06 a |
| 3‐oxododecanoyl ACP | 17.21 ± 2.10 b | 1.74 ± 0.11 d |
The values are the means ± standard deviations of three independent experiments. The statistical analyses were performed in Microsoft Excel with P values between each pairwise comparison calculated by two‐tailed Student’s t‐tests. Significant differences are indicated by different letters (P < 0.05).
Figure 5The effects of the Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc) fabG3 deletion on the virulence of Xcc. (A) Pathogenicity test on Chinese radish with the Xcc wild‐type (wt) strain, Xcc fabG3‐deletion mutant strain Xcc YH1 and complementary strain Xcc YH2. (B) Test of the virulence of the Xcc strains by measuring lesion length after introducing bacteria into the vascular system of Chinese radish by leaf clipping. Values are expressed as the means and standard deviations of triplicate measurements, each comprising ten leaves. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (P = 0.05).
Figure 6The effects of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc) fabG3 deletion on the production of DSF family signals. (A) DSF family signal bioassay of Xcc strains. The formation of a blue halo owing to hydrolysis of 5‐bromo‐4‐chloro‐3‐indolyl‐β‐d‐glucuronic acid around the site of inoculation indicates the presence of DSF‐like activity. (B) DSF family signals produced by Xcc fabG3 deletion and complemented strains. Supernatants of 20 mL of Xcc strains grown in NA medium for 24 h were collected, and DSF family signals were detected with the liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry (LC‐MS) method. In strain Xcc YH1 the Xcc fabG3 gene was deleted in the wild‐type strain; strain Xcc YH2 has Xcc fabG3 being complemented by the plasmid pSRK‐Km in Xcc YH2. The relative amounts of signal molecules were calculated on the basis of their peak areas. The data shown are the means of the results of three repeats and error bars indicate standard deviations. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments based on the least significant difference at P = 0.05.
Figure 7The proposed biosynthetic pathway for xanthomonadins in Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris. The precursor 3‐hydroxylbenzoic acid is ligated to ACP (or CoA) by XanA2. Xcc3998 and Xcc4004 in the pig cluster are proposed to encode the keto synthase and dehydratase, respectively, involved in xanthomonadin biosynthesis.
Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
| Bacterial strain | Relevant characteristics | Source |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| DH‐5α | F‐ | Laboratory stock |
| BL21(DE3) | F‐ | Laboratory stock |
| S17‐1 | Tpr Smr | Laboratory stock |
| CL104 |
| Laboratory stock |
| MG1655 | Wild‐type | Laboratory stock |
|
| ||
| XC1 | Rifr, wild‐type | Qian |
| FE58 | Rifr, Tcr, | Wang |
| YH1 | Rifr, Δ | This study |
| YH2 | Rifr, Kmr, | This study |
| XC1(Δ | Rifr, XC1Δ | Zhou |
| YH3 | Rifr, XC1Δ | This study |
| YH4 | Rifr, Kmr, | This study |
| YH5 | Rifr, Kmr, XC1Δ | This study |
| YH6 | Rifr, Kmr, | This study |
| YH7 | Rifr, Kmr, | This study |
| YH8 | Rifr, | This study |
| YH9 | Rifr, | This study |
| YH10 | Rifr, Kmr, | This study |
| Plasmids | ||
| pET‐28b | Kmr, T7 promoter‐based expression vector | Novagen |
| pMD19‐T | Ampr, TA cloning vector | Takara |
| pSRK‐Km | Kmr, broad‐host‐range expression vector containing | Khan |
| pK18mobscaB | Kmr, | Schafer |
| pBAD24M | Ampr; pBAD24 | Zhu |
| pHWG | Ampr, | Lab stock |
| pYYH‐1 | Ampr, | This study |
| pYYH‐2 | Ampr, | This study |
| pYYH‐3 | Kmr, | This study |
| pYYH‐4 |
Kmr, about 1000 bp | This study |
| pYYH‐5 | Kmr, | This study |
| pYYH‐6 | Kmr, | This study |
| pYYH‐7 | Kmr, | This study |
| pYYH‐8 | Ampr, | This study |
| pYYH‐9 |
Kmr, about 1000 bp | This study |
| pYYH‐10 | Kmr, | This study |
Rifr, Tc r, Kmr and Ampr indicate resistance to rifampicin, tetracycline, kanamycin and ampicillin, respectively.