Literature DB >> 31560788

Tumour budding/T cell infiltrates in colorectal cancer: proposal of a novel combined score.

Heather Dawson1, Lucine Christe1, Micha Eichmann1, Stefan Reinhard1, Inti Zlobec1, Annika Blank1, Alessandro Lugli1.   

Abstract

AIMS: The tumour-node-metastasis classification system is used for prognostication purposes and to guide patient management. However, in colorectal cancer (CRC), additional markers are needed to stratify prognostic subgroups. Two promising markers have emerged from large bodies of research: tumour budding and T cell host response (CD3, CD8 and CD45RO infiltrates). However, attempts to combine these two parameters have been sparse. The aim of this study was to perform an assessment of potential protagonists that could be used in a combined score (budding/T cell score, BTS). METHODS AND
RESULTS: This descriptive, retrospective study was performed on a multipunch tissue microarray containing material from 345 patients with stages I-IV CRC. Areas from tumour centre, front and microenvironment were stained for pancytokeratin/CD3, pancytokeratin/CD8 and pancytokeratin/CD45RO. Tumour buds were scored manually and T cell infiltrates digitally using open-source software. Tumour buds, T cell counts and combined BTS were associated with clinicopathological features and overall survival (OS). A higher combined BTS score (buds/CD8, tumour centre) performed better than budding or CD8/CD3 alone in predicting nodal metastases (P < 0.0001, OR = 1.466, 95% CI = 1.115-1.928). Only higher BTS (buds/CD3) were significantly associated with poorer OS on multivariate analysis (P = 0.012, hazard ratio = 1.218, 95% confidence interval = 1.044-1.419).
CONCLUSIONS: Although CD8+ /CD3+ T cells are predictive of tumour biology in CRC, we found a combined BTS to be stronger in predicting survival and certain features with high clinical relevance, such as nodal metastases, in comparison to budding or T cells alone. Further studies combining T cell infiltrates and tumour budding are necessary to optimise risk assessment of CRC.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immunoscore; colorectal cancer; host response; tumour budding

Year:  2020        PMID: 31560788     DOI: 10.1111/his.14006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histopathology        ISSN: 0309-0167            Impact factor:   5.087


  4 in total

1.  Tumor budding as a prognostic indicator in colorectal carcinoma: a retrospective study of primary colorectal carcinoma cases in a tertiary care center.

Authors:  Ashini H Shah; Amisha J Gami; Neetal H Desai; Jahnavi S Gandhi; Priti P Trivedi
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-18

2.  A combined spatial score of granzyme B and CD68 surpasses CD8 as an independent prognostic factor in TNM stage II colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Luca Noti; José A Galván; Heather Dawson; Alessandro Lugli; Richard Kirsch; Naziheh Assarzadegan; David Messenger; Philippe Krebs; Martin D Berger; Inti Zlobec
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Transcriptomic Immune Profiles Can Represent the Tumor Immune Microenvironment Related to the Tumor Budding Histology in Uterine Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Tan Minh Le; Hong Duc Thi Nguyen; Eunmi Lee; Donghyeon Lee; Ye Seul Choi; Junghwan Cho; Nora Jee-Young Park; Hyung Soo Han; Gun Oh Chong
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-07       Impact factor: 4.141

4.  Tumour budding, poorly differentiated clusters, and T-cell response in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kenji Fujiyoshi; Juha P Väyrynen; Jennifer Borowsky; David J Papke; Kota Arima; Koichiro Haruki; Junko Kishikawa; Naohiko Akimoto; Tomotaka Ugai; Mai Chan Lau; Simeng Gu; Shanshan Shi; Melissa Zhao; Annacarolina Fabiana Lucia Da Silva; Tyler S Twombly; Hongmei Nan; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Mingyang Song; Xuehong Zhang; Kana Wu; Andrew T Chan; Charles S Fuchs; Jochen K Lennerz; Marios Giannakis; Jonathan A Nowak; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 8.143

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.