Literature DB >> 31560757

Developmental constraints and resource environment shape early emergence and investment in spines in saplings.

Mohammed Armani1,2, Tristan Charles-Dominique3, Kasey E Barton4, Kyle W Tomlinson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Herbivory by large mammals imposes a critical recruitment bottleneck on plants in many systems. Spines defend plants against large herbivores, and how early they emerge in saplings may be one of the strongest predictors of sapling survival in herbivore-rich environments. Yet little effort has been directed at understanding the variability in spine emergence across saplings.
METHODS: We present a multispecies study examining whether and how sapling size, spine type and species' environmental niche (light and precipitation environment) influence early emergence and biomass investment in spines. A phylogenetically diverse pool of 45 species possessing different spine types (spines, prickles and thorns; that are derived from distinct plant organs: leaf, epidermis or cortex, and branch, respectively), were grown under common-garden conditions, and patterns of spine emergence and biomass allocation to spines at 5 and 15 weeks after transplanting were characterized. KEY
RESULTS: Spine type and species' resource niche were the main factors driving early emergence and investment patterns. Spines emerged earliest in leaf spine-bearing species, and latest in thorn-bearing species. The probability of early spine emergence increased with decreasing precipitation, and was greater in species from open than from closed habitats. Sapling investment in spines changed with plant mass but was contingent on spine type and habitat type.
CONCLUSIONS: Different spine types have strikingly different timing of expression, suggesting that developmental origins of spines play a critical role in sapling defences. Furthermore, species from different precipitation and light environments (open vs. closed habitats) showed contrasting patterns of early spine expression, suggesting that resource limitation in their native range may have driven divergent evolution of early defence expression.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  Developmental constraints; early emergence; large herbivore; prickle; resource environment; sapling; spine; spinescence; thorn

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31560757      PMCID: PMC6943690          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcz152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  26 in total

Review 1.  Out of the quagmire of plant defense hypotheses.

Authors:  Nancy Stamp
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.875

2.  Plant defence as a complex and changing phenotype throughout ontogeny.

Authors:  Sofía Ochoa-López; Nora Villamil; Paulina Zedillo-Avelleyra; Karina Boege
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 3.  Seduced by the dark side: integrating molecular and ecological perspectives on the influence of light on plant defence against pests and pathogens.

Authors:  Michael R Roberts; Nigel D Paul
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 4.  Plant architecture: a dynamic, multilevel and comprehensive approach to plant form, structure and ontogeny.

Authors:  Daniel Barthélémy; Yves Caraglio
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 5.  Seedling-herbivore interactions: insights into plant defence and regeneration patterns.

Authors:  Kasey E Barton; Mick E Hanley
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Does investment in leaf defenses drive changes in leaf economic strategy? A focus on whole-plant ontogeny.

Authors:  Chase M Mason; Lisa A Donovan
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Correlations between physical and chemical defences in plants: tradeoffs, syndromes, or just many different ways to skin a herbivorous cat?

Authors:  Angela T Moles; Begoña Peco; Ian R Wallis; William J Foley; Alistair G B Poore; Eric W Seabloom; Peter A Vesk; Alejandro J Bisigato; Lucrecia Cella-Pizarro; Connie J Clark; Philippe S Cohen; William K Cornwell; Will Edwards; Rasmus Ejrnaes; Therany Gonzales-Ojeda; Bente J Graae; Gregory Hay; Fainess C Lumbwe; Benjamín Magaña-Rodríguez; Ben D Moore; Pablo L Peri; John R Poulsen; James C Stegen; Ruan Veldtman; Hugo von Zeipel; Nigel R Andrew; Sarah L Boulter; Elizabeth T Borer; Johannes H C Cornelissen; Alejandro G Farji-Brener; Jane L DeGabriel; Enrique Jurado; Line A Kyhn; Bill Low; Christa P H Mulder; Kathryn Reardon-Smith; Jorge Rodríguez-Velázquez; An De Fortier; Zheng Zheng; Pedro G Blendinger; Brian J Enquist; Jose M Facelli; Tiffany Knight; Jonathan D Majer; Miguel Martínez-Ramos; Peter McQuillan; Francis K C Hui
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 10.151

8.  Dihydroflavonol Reductase Activity in Relation to Differential Anthocyanin Accumulation in Juvenile and Mature Phase Hedera helix L.

Authors:  J R Murray; W P Hackett
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Prickles, latex, and tolerance in the endemic Hawaiian prickly poppy (Argemone glauca): variation between populations, across ontogeny, and in response to abiotic factors.

Authors:  Kasey E Barton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Rose Prickles and Asparagus Spines--Different Hook Structures as Attachment Devices in Climbing Plants.

Authors:  Friederike Gallenmüller; Amélie Feus; Kathrin Fiedler; Thomas Speck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Defence emergence during early ontogeny reveals important differences between spines, thorns and prickles.

Authors:  Tyler C Coverdale
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Trunk spines of trees: a physical defence against bark removal and climbing by mammals?

Authors:  Théodore Lefebvre; Tristan Charles-Dominique; Kyle W Tomlinson
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 5.040

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.