Literature DB >> 31560454

Associations Between Classification Criteria Items in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Zahi Touma1, Ricard Cervera2, Ralph Brinks3, Valentina Lorenzoni4, Chiara Tani5, Bimba F Hoyer6, Karen H Costenbader7, Gian Domenico Sebastiani8, Sandra V Navarra9, Eloisa Bonfa10, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman11, Sara K Tedeschi7, Thomas Dörner12, Sindhu R Johnson13, Martin Aringer14, Marta Mosca5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A project aimed at developing new classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is based on weighted criteria that include both laboratory and clinical items. Combinations of certain symptoms may occur commonly in SLE, which provides an argument against independently counting these items. The current study was undertaken to evaluate the interrelationship between candidate criteria items in the International Early SLE cohort and in the Euro-Lupus cohort.
METHODS: The International Early SLE cohort included 389 patients, who were diagnosed within 3 years prior to the study. Data on the ACR's 1997 update of the SLE revised criteria, the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics 2012 criteria, and on 30 additional items were collected. To evaluate the interrelationship of the criteria, a tetrachoric correlation was used to assess the degree of association between different manifestations in the same organ system. The correlations identified in the International Early SLE cohort were validated in the Euro-Lupus cohort.
RESULTS: A few relevant correlations were observed among specific clinical cutaneous manifestations (in particular, malar rash correlated with photosensitivity, alopecia, and oral ulcers) and serologic manifestations (anti-Sm and anti-double-stranded DNA and anti-RNA polymerase, anti-Ro and anti-La, and antiphospholipid antibodies), and these results were validated in the Euro-Lupus cohort. The associations within the mucocutaneous domain, hematologic and the specific autoantibodies suggest that within a single domain only the highest ranking item should be counted to avoid overrepresentation.
CONCLUSION: Some of the candidate SLE criteria cluster within domains. Given these interrelationships, multiple criteria within a domain should not be independently counted. These results are important to consider for the structure of new SLE classification criteria.
© 2020, American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31560454     DOI: 10.1002/acr.24078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)        ISSN: 2151-464X            Impact factor:   4.794


  7 in total

Review 1.  Neuropsychiatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Older Adults: Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Oshrat E Tayer-Shifman; Kathleen S Bingham; Zahi Touma
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  New classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Martin Aringer; Michelle Petri
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 3.  A glimpse into the future of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Martin Aringer; Marta E Alarcón-Riquelme; Megan Clowse; Guillermo J Pons-Estel; Edward M Vital; Maria Dall'Era
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 5.346

4.  SLE classification criteria: Science-based icons or algorithmic distractions - an intellectually demanding dilemma.

Authors:  Ole Petter Rekvig
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 8.786

5.  Mapping Salivary Proteases in Sjögren's Syndrome Patients Reveals Overexpression of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4/CD26.

Authors:  Laís Garreto; Sébastien Charneau; Samuel Coelho Mandacaru; Otávio T Nóbrega; Flávia N Motta; Carla N de Araújo; Audrey C Tonet; Flávia M B Modesto; Lilian M Paula; Marcelo Valle de Sousa; Jaime M Santana; Ana Carolina Acevedo; Izabela M D Bastos
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Authors:  Martin Aringer; Karen Costenbader; David Daikh; Ralph Brinks; Marta Mosca; Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman; Josef S Smolen; David Wofsy; Dimitrios T Boumpas; Diane L Kamen; David Jayne; Ricard Cervera; Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau; Betty Diamond; Dafna D Gladman; Bevra Hahn; Falk Hiepe; Søren Jacobsen; Dinesh Khanna; Kirsten Lerstrøm; Elena Massarotti; Joseph McCune; Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza; Jorge Sanchez-Guerrero; Matthias Schneider; Murray Urowitz; George Bertsias; Bimba F Hoyer; Nicolai Leuchten; Chiara Tani; Sara K Tedeschi; Zahi Touma; Gabriela Schmajuk; Branimir Anic; Florence Assan; Tak Mao Chan; Ann Elaine Clarke; Mary K Crow; László Czirják; Andrea Doria; Winfried Graninger; Bernadett Halda-Kiss; Sarfaraz Hasni; Peter M Izmirly; Michelle Jung; Gábor Kumánovics; Xavier Mariette; Ivan Padjen; José M Pego-Reigosa; Juanita Romero-Diaz; Íñigo Rúa-Figueroa Fernández; Raphaèle Seror; Georg H Stummvoll; Yoshiya Tanaka; Maria G Tektonidou; Carlos Vasconcelos; Edward M Vital; Daniel J Wallace; Sule Yavuz; Pier Luigi Meroni; Marvin J Fritzler; Ray Naden; Thomas Dörner; Sindhu R Johnson
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 15.483

7.  Autoimmunity and SLE: Factual and Semantic Evidence-Based Critical Analyses of Definitions, Etiology, and Pathogenesis.

Authors:  Ole Petter Rekvig
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 7.561

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.