Literature DB >> 31560126

Recovery of thermophilic Campylobacter by three sampling methods from river sites in Northeast Georgia, USA, and their antimicrobial resistance genes.

R J Meinersmann1, M E Berrang1, J K Bradshaw2,3, M Molina2, D E Cosby1, L L Genzlinger1, B J Snyder2.   

Abstract

Sixteen sites in the watershed of the South Fork of the Broad River (SFBR) in Northeastern Georgia, USA, were sampled in two seasons to detect Campylobacter. Sites were classified as mostly influenced by forest, pasture, wastewater pollution control plants (WPC) or mixed use. Sampling was repeated in the late spring and late fall for 2 years for a total of 126 samples. Free-catch water and sediment grab samples were taken at each site; Moore's swabs were placed for up to 3 days at most sites. A total of 56 isolates of thermophilic Campylobacter were recovered. Thirteen samplings were positive by two or three methods, and 26 samplings were positive by only one method; once by Moore's swab only and 25 times by free-catch water only. Campylobacter was detected at 58% of cattle pasture sites, 30% of forested sites and 81% of WPC sites. Twenty-one of the isolates carried antimicrobial resistance genes, mostly blaOXA-61. Free-catch water samples were more efficient than Moore's swabs or sediment samples for recovery of Campylobacter, which was more likely to be detected in streams near cattle pastures and human communities than in forested land. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The role of environmental water in transmitting Campylobacter was investigated, and methods for recovery of the organism were compared. The sequence types of recovered Campylobacter correlated with adjacent land use without regard to the method used to isolate the organisms. Sequence types and antimicrobial resistance genes associated with cattle were most prevalent near pastures. Even though types were recurrent at a given site, types appeared to be lost or replaced as the water flowed downstream. Published 2019. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Campylobacter sp.; antimicrobial resistance gene; multilocus sequence typing; population comparisons; watershed

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31560126      PMCID: PMC9109067          DOI: 10.1111/lam.13224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 0266-8254            Impact factor:   2.813


  15 in total

1.  Factors associated with increased and decreased risk of Campylobacter infection: a prospective case-control study in Norway.

Authors:  Georg Kapperud; Gyrid Espeland; Erik Wahl; Anna Walde; Hallgeir Herikstad; Stein Gustavsen; Ingvar Tveit; Olav Natås; Lars Bevanger; Asbjørn Digranes
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Risk factors for domestic sporadic campylobacteriosis among young children in Sweden.

Authors:  Juan Carrique-Mas; Yvonne Andersson; Marika Hjertqvist; Ake Svensson; Anna Torner; Johan Giesecke
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis       Date:  2005

3.  Multilocus sequence typing system for Campylobacter jejuni.

Authors:  K E Dingle; F M Colles; D R Wareing; R Ure; A J Fox; F E Bolton; H J Bootsma; R J Willems; R Urwin; M C Maiden
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  A national investigation of the prevalence and diversity of thermophilic Campylobacter species in agricultural watersheds in Canada.

Authors:  Izhar U H Khan; Vic Gannon; Cassandra C Jokinen; Rob Kent; Wendell Koning; David R Lapen; Diane Medeiros; Jim Miller; Norman F Neumann; Rob Phillips; Hans Schreier; Edward Topp; Eric van Bochove; Graham Wilkes; Thomas A Edge
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes.

Authors:  Ea Zankari; Henrik Hasman; Salvatore Cosentino; Martin Vestergaard; Simon Rasmussen; Ole Lund; Frank M Aarestrup; Mette Voldby Larsen
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Closely related Campylobacter jejuni strains from different sources reveal a generalist rather than a specialist lifestyle.

Authors:  Eugenia Gripp; Daniela Hlahla; Xavier Didelot; Friederike Kops; Sven Maurischat; Karsten Tedin; Thomas Alter; Lüppo Ellerbroek; Kerstin Schreiber; Dietmar Schomburg; Traute Janssen; Patrick Bartholomäus; Dirk Hofreuter; Sabrina Woltemate; Markus Uhr; Birgit Brenneke; Petra Grüning; Gerald Gerlach; Lothar Wieler; Sebastian Suerbaum; Christine Josenhans
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis.

Authors:  Laurent Excoffier; Guillaume Laval; Stefan Schneider
Journal:  Evol Bioinform Online       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 1.625

8.  Risk Factors for Sporadic Domestically Acquired Campylobacter Infections in Norway 2010-2011: A National Prospective Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Emily MacDonald; Richard White; Ricardo Mexia; Tone Bruun; Georg Kapperud; Heidi Lange; Karin Nygård; Line Vold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The CJIE1 prophage of Campylobacter jejuni affects protein expression in growth media with and without bile salts.

Authors:  Clifford G Clark; Patrick M Chong; Stuart J McCorrister; Philippe Simon; Matthew Walker; David M Lee; Kimberly Nguy; Keding Cheng; Matthew W Gilmour; Garrett R Westmacott
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Survival with a Helping Hand: Campylobacter and Microbiota.

Authors:  Ivana Indikova; Tom J Humphrey; Friederike Hilbert
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 5.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) for simulating E. coli concentrations at the watershed-scale.

Authors:  Robert A Sowah; Kenneth Bradshaw; Blake Snyder; David Spidle; Marirosa Molina
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 7.963

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.