Literature DB >> 3156011

Follow-up clinical results in patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

T A Mabin, D R Holmes, H C Smith, R E Vlietstra, G S Reeder, J F Bresnahan, A A Bove, L N Hammes, L R Elveback, T A Orszulak.   

Abstract

Complete follow-up data were obtained from 229 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) between 1979 and 1982 (mean follow-up 14 months, range 6 to 37). Single-vessel disease was present in 143 and multivessel disease in 86. PTCA was successful in 153 patients (67%). Failure was followed initially by bypass surgery in 59 and by continued medical therapy in 17. After successful PTCA, 90% of patients were improved subjectively and 74% were asymptomatic at follow-up. After unsuccessful PTCA but prompt bypass, 90% were improved subjectively and 85% were asymptomatic. Among the 229 patients, 39 (17%) required an additional intervention because of angina during follow-up; 15 of these had repeat PTCA and 18 had bypass surgery. Among patients with successful PTCA, revascularization was complete in 77% and partial in 23%. The completeness of revascularization with PTCA had a significant impact on follow-up. The follow-up data of patients with successful single-vessel PTCA and of those with multivessel disease with complete revascularization were similar. When the patients with complete revascularization were compared with those with multivessel disease but incomplete revascularization, the follow-up data were characterized by a higher incidence of angina or need for bypass surgery in the latter group (63%) than in the former group (29%); those with incomplete revascularization also had a significantly reduced event-free survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3156011     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.71.4.754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  17 in total

1.  The Strecker stent: indications and results in iliac and femoropopliteal arteries.

Authors:  D Liermann; E P Strecker; J Peters
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 2.  Restenosis after angioplasty.

Authors:  A H Gershlick; D P de Bono
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1990-12

3.  Long-term angiographic follow up, cardiac events, and survival in patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  S M Ernst; T A van der Feltz; E T Bal; L van Bogerijen; E van den Berg; C A Ascoop; H W Plokker
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1987-03

4.  Assessing the success of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  P D Bourdillon
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1987-09

Review 5.  Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: state of the art and future directions.

Authors:  G S Roubin; A R Gruentzig
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1985

Review 6.  Coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  I C Cooper; M Signy; M M Webb-Peploe; D J Coltart
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  Percutaneous coronary angioplasty: technique, indications, and results.

Authors:  G S Roubin; A R Gruentzig; W J Casarella
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 8.  Indications for routine heart-catheterization after CABG and PTCA.

Authors:  A Breeman; P W Serruys
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1993

Review 9.  Revascularization therapy for coronary artery disease. Coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  J M Wilson; J J Ferguson
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1995

10.  Rates of cardiac catheterization, coronary angioplasty and open-heart surgery in adults in Canada.

Authors:  L A Higginson; J A Cairns; W J Keon; E R Smith
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.