Literature DB >> 31559923

Endothelial/Mesenchymal Stem Cell Crosstalk Within Bioprinted Cocultures.

Marco Santoro1,2, Tolulope O Awosika1,2, Kirstie L Snodderly1,2, Amelia C Hurley-Novatny1,2, Max J Lerman2,3, John P Fisher1,2.   

Abstract

The development of viable tissue surrogates requires a vascular network that sustains cell metabolism and tissue development. The coculture of endothelial cells (ECs) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), the two key players involved in blood vessel formation, has been heralded in tissue engineering (TE) as one of the most promising approaches for scaffold vascularization. However, MSCs may exert both proangiogenic and antiangiogenic role. Furthermore, it is unclear which cell type is responsible for the upregulation of angiogenic pathways observed in EC:MSC cocultures. There is disagreement on the proangiogenic action of MSCs, as they have also been shown to negatively affect the formation of capillary networks. To address these issues, we investigated the regulation of key angiogenic pathways in scaffolds hosting different EC:MSC ratios fabricated through extrusion-based bioprinting. Human ECs were cocultured with either rat or human MSCs, and the regulation of fundamental angiogenic and arteriogenic pathways was analyzed through DNA, gene, and protein expression. The use of a hybrid human/rat coculture system facilitated pinpointing each cell type role in the regulation of specific genes and showed that MSCs exert a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on the EC expression of angiogenic factors within the first 24 h. Within a week of coculture, MSCs exert a proangiogenic effect, as corroborated in human/human bioprinted cocultures. Interestingly, juxtacrine signaling promoted secretion of the angiogenic factor vascular endothelial growth factor in direct cocultures (EC and MSC co-encapsulated), while paracrine signaling encouraged secretion of the arteriogenic factor platelet-derived growth factor in indirect cocultures (adjacent bioprinting of EC-laden and MSC-laden scaffolds). Overall, the use of a bioprinted system to elucidate EC:MSC interplay allows rapid leveraging of the data for novel vascular TE applications. Despite the transitory negative effect early in the culture, MSC presence is necessary for the regulation of pathways involved in arteriogenesis. With further validation in vivo, this study provides a possible explanation to the controversial findings present in literature and shows how MSC effect on angiogenic pathway regulation mimics the dynamics of blood vessel formation reported in literature and normally occurring in vivo. Impact Statement The coculturing of endothelial cells (ECs) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) holds great promise in tissue engineering for the development of prevascularized tissue constructs. Yet, different studies report conflicting results on the role of MSCs, which can either support or inhibit vasculature formation. Furthermore, it is unclear how each cell type modulates distinct pathways involved in angiogenesis when cocultured. Using bioprinted hybrid coculture systems, we show that MSCs have both a time- and dose-dependent effect on the gene and protein expression of key angiogenic and arteriogenic factors by ECs. These findings, obtained in translationally relevant setup, can readily inform the design of vascularized scaffolds.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioprinting; coculture models; endothelial cells; mesenchymal stem cells

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31559923      PMCID: PMC8851226          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2019.0175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  35 in total

Review 1.  Engineering principles of clinical cell-based tissue engineering.

Authors:  George F Muschler; Chizu Nakamoto; Linda G Griffith
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Regulation of mesenchymal stem cell activity by endothelial cells.

Authors:  Fatima A Saleh; Muna Whyte; Peter Ashton; Paul G Genever
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 3.  Vascularization is the key challenge in tissue engineering.

Authors:  Esther C Novosel; Claudia Kleinhans; Petra J Kluger
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 15.470

4.  Bioprinted Osteogenic and Vasculogenic Patterns for Engineering 3D Bone Tissue.

Authors:  Batzaya Byambaa; Nasim Annabi; Kan Yue; Grissel Trujillo-de Santiago; Mario Moisés Alvarez; Weitao Jia; Mehdi Kazemzadeh-Narbat; Su Ryon Shin; Ali Tamayol; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 5.  The pivotal role of vascularization in tissue engineering.

Authors:  François A Auger; Laure Gibot; Dan Lacroix
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 9.590

6.  Direct 3D bioprinting of perfusable vascular constructs using a blend bioink.

Authors:  Weitao Jia; P Selcan Gungor-Ozkerim; Yu Shrike Zhang; Kan Yue; Kai Zhu; Wanjun Liu; Qingment Pi; Batzaya Byambaa; Mehmet Remzi Dokmeci; Su Ryon Shin; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Repair of Tympanic Membrane Perforations with Customized Bioprinted Ear Grafts Using Chinchilla Models.

Authors:  Che-Ying Kuo; Emmanuel Wilson; Andrew Fuson; Nidhi Gandhi; Reza Monfaredi; Audrey Jenkins; Maria Romero; Marco Santoro; John P Fisher; Kevin Cleary; Brian Reilly
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 8.  Building vascular networks.

Authors:  Hojae Bae; Amey S Puranik; Robert Gauvin; Faramarz Edalat; Brenda Carrillo-Conde; Nicholas A Peppas; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  In vivo imaging demonstrates a time-line for new vessel formation in islet transplantation.

Authors:  Eba Hathout; Nathaniel K Chan; Annie Tan; Naoaki Sakata; John Mace; William Pearce; Ricardo Peverini; Richard Chinnock; Lawrence Sowers; Andre Obenaus
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2008-10-31

10.  A method for estimating the oxygen consumption rate in multicellular tumour spheroids.

Authors:  David Robert Grimes; Catherine Kelly; Katarzyna Bloch; Mike Partridge
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.118

View more
  5 in total

1.  Vascularization in tissue engineering: fundamentals and state-of-art.

Authors:  Guang Yang; Bhushan Mahadik; Ji Young Choi; John P Fisher
Journal:  Prog Biomed Eng (Bristol)       Date:  2020-01-09

Review 2.  Mesenchymal Stem/Progenitor Cells: The Prospect of Human Clinical Translation.

Authors:  Dina Rady; Marwa M S Abbass; Aiah A El-Rashidy; Sara El Moshy; Israa Ahmed Radwan; Christof E Dörfer; Karim M Fawzy El-Sayed
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 5.443

3.  Controlled growth factor delivery system with osteogenic-angiogenic coupling effect for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Fei Kang; Qiying Yi; Pengcheng Gu; Yuhan Dong; Ziyang Zhang; Lijuan Zhang; Yan Bai
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Endothelial Cells Promote Migration of Mesenchymal Stem Cells via PDGF-BB/PDGFRβ-Src-Akt in the Context of Inflammatory Microenvironment upon Bone Defect.

Authors:  Sihao He; Tianyong Hou; Jiangling Zhou; Qiuchi Ai; Ce Dou; Fei Luo; Jianzhong Xu; Junchao Xing
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 5.131

Review 5.  Mesenchymal Stem Cells as a Promising Cell Source for Integration in Novel In Vitro Models.

Authors:  Ann-Kristin Afflerbach; Mark D Kiri; Tahir Detinis; Ben M Maoz
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-09-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.