Literature DB >> 31559334

Extractions of Medical Cannabis Cultivars and the Role of Decarboxylation in Optimal Receptor Responses.

Melissa M Lewis-Bakker1, Yi Yang1,2, Rupali Vyawahare1, Lakshmi P Kotra1,2,3.   

Abstract

Introduction: Phytocannabinoids, characteristic compounds produced by medical cannabis, interact with cannabinoid (CB) receptors (CB1 and CB2) as well as other receptor systems to exhibit their corresponding pharmacological effects. In their natural form, CBs such as Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid and cannabidiolic acid are inactive at these receptors, while their decarboxylated forms (Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol, respectively) are potent ligands at CB receptors. Thus, extraction and processing of medical cannabis for active constituents are important. Purpose and
Methods: Patients consuming medical cannabis often have limited alternative treatment options and in recent years, medical cannabis extracts have been popular as a substitute for dried cannabis plants, despite limited studies on these derivatives. We investigated three disparate cannabis cultivars and compared four chemical extraction methods head to head, viz. Soxhlet, ultrasound-assisted supercritical fluid, and microwave-assisted extractions, for their efficiency. We further characterized the chemical compositions of these extracts.
Results: Microwave extraction consistently produced completely decarboxylated phytocannabinoid extracts. Factors such as temperature and exposure time play important roles in the decarboxylation of phytocannabinoids, thereby generating pharmacologically active CBs, and these conditions may differ for each cannabis cultivar.
Conclusion: Chemical consistency and potency due to active compounds are in turn important in producing consistent and reliable medical cannabis extracts and their derivatives. These processes must be subject to higher levels of scientific rigor as the patient population around the world are seeking the help of such extracts for various clinical conditions, and as medical cannabis industry is receiving acceptance in various countries.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cannabinoid receptors; decarboxylation; extraction; medical cannabis; phytocannabinoids

Year:  2019        PMID: 31559334      PMCID: PMC6757234          DOI: 10.1089/can.2018.0067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cannabis Cannabinoid Res        ISSN: 2378-8763


  6 in total

Review 1.  Acidic Cannabinoid Decarboxylation.

Authors:  Crist N Filer
Journal:  Cannabis Cannabinoid Res       Date:  2021-09-22

Review 2.  A Comprehensive Review on the Techniques for Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Medicinal Cannabis.

Authors:  Hebah Muhsien Sabiah Al Ubeed; Deep Jyoti Bhuyan; Muhammad A Alsherbiny; Amrita Basu; Quan V Vuong
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 3.  The Medicinal Natural Products of Cannabis sativa Linn.: A Review.

Authors:  Anwuli Endurance Odieka; Gloria Ukalina Obuzor; Opeoluwa Oyehan Oyedeji; Mavuto Gondwe; Yiseyon Sunday Hosu; Adebola Omowunmi Oyedeji
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  Bioactive Chemical Composition of Cannabis Extracts and Cannabinoid Receptors.

Authors:  Yi Yang; Rupali Vyawahare; Melissa Lewis-Bakker; Hance A Clarke; Albert H C Wong; Lakshmi P Kotra
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 5.  Understanding the Medical Chemistry of the Cannabis Plant is Critical to Guiding Real World Clinical Evidence.

Authors:  Karim S Ladha; Prabjit Ajrawat; Yi Yang; Hance Clarke
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Different Cannabis sativa Extraction Methods Result in Different Biological Activities against a Colon Cancer Cell Line and Healthy Colon Cells.

Authors:  Jan Rožanc; Petra Kotnik; Marko Milojević; Lidija Gradišnik; Maša Knez Hrnčič; Željko Knez; Uroš Maver
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.