Kimberly H McManama O'Brien1,2, Shai Fuxman1,2, Laura Humm3, Nicole Tirone1, Warren Jay Pires4, Andrea Cole4, Julie Goldstein Grumet5. 1. Education Development Center, Waltham, MA, USA. 2. Department of Health Promotion, Practice, and Innovation, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 3. SIMmersion, LLC, Columbia, MD, USA. 4. Institute for Family Health, New York, NY, USA. 5. Zero Suicide Institute, Education Development Center, Waltham, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Improving the identification of and intervention with patients at risk for suicide requires innovative training techniques that safely and effectively teach or enhance practitioners' skills. Virtual patient simulations (VPS) can be particularly effective for this purpose because they allow for repetition in skill building as well as a safe space to practice difficult interactions with patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a novel VPS that trains practitioners in suicide risk assessment, as well as to examine pre-post changes in suicide-related knowledge through a pilot of the VPS training. METHODS: Practitioners (n=20) were recruited from a Federally Qualified Health Center in the northeastern United States to test the feasibility and acceptability of a VPS suicide risk assessment training. A paired samples t-test was conducted to compare mean differences in practitioners' suicide risk assessment knowledge scores from pre- to post-training, on a scale of 0 to 10. RESULTS: The VPS was feasible to implement, with 18 of 20 participants using the VPS for an average of 21 to 95 minutes, and was acceptable to participants, with an average satisfaction rating of 5.82 out of 7. Participants' knowledge scores improved significantly by an average of 1.86 points from pre- to post-training. CONCLUSIONS: The VPS was feasible and acceptable to this sample of practitioners and significantly increased knowledge from pre- to post-training. As such, VPS holds promise as a technique to develop skills in suicide risk assessment.
BACKGROUND: Improving the identification of and intervention with patients at risk for suicide requires innovative training techniques that safely and effectively teach or enhance practitioners' skills. Virtual patient simulations (VPS) can be particularly effective for this purpose because they allow for repetition in skill building as well as a safe space to practice difficult interactions with patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a novel VPS that trains practitioners in suicide risk assessment, as well as to examine pre-post changes in suicide-related knowledge through a pilot of the VPS training. METHODS: Practitioners (n=20) were recruited from a Federally Qualified Health Center in the northeastern United States to test the feasibility and acceptability of a VPS suicide risk assessment training. A paired samples t-test was conducted to compare mean differences in practitioners' suicide risk assessment knowledge scores from pre- to post-training, on a scale of 0 to 10. RESULTS: The VPS was feasible to implement, with 18 of 20 participants using the VPS for an average of 21 to 95 minutes, and was acceptable to participants, with an average satisfaction rating of 5.82 out of 7. Participants' knowledge scores improved significantly by an average of 1.86 points from pre- to post-training. CONCLUSIONS: The VPS was feasible and acceptable to this sample of practitioners and significantly increased knowledge from pre- to post-training. As such, VPS holds promise as a technique to develop skills in suicide risk assessment.
Authors: William M Schmitz; Michael H Allen; Barry N Feldman; Nina J Gutin; Danielle R Jahn; Phillip M Kleespies; Paul Quinnett; Skip Simpson Journal: Suicide Life Threat Behav Date: 2012-04-11
Authors: J John Mann; Alan Apter; Jose Bertolote; Annette Beautrais; Dianne Currier; Ann Haas; Ulrich Hegerl; Jouko Lonnqvist; Kevin Malone; Andrej Marusic; Lars Mehlum; George Patton; Michael Phillips; Wolfgang Rutz; Zoltan Rihmer; Armin Schmidtke; David Shaffer; Morton Silverman; Yoshitomo Takahashi; Airi Varnik; Danuta Wasserman; Paul Yip; Herbert Hendin Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-10-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Barbara Stanley; Gregory Brown; David A Brent; Karen Wells; Kim Poling; John Curry; Betsy D Kennard; Ann Wagner; Mary F Cwik; Anat Brunstein Klomek; Tina Goldstein; Benedetto Vitiello; Shannon Barnett; Stephanie Daniel; Jennifer Hughes Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Michael Fleming; Dale Olsen; Hilary Stathes; Laura Boteler; Paul Grossberg; Judie Pfeifer; Stephanie Schiro; Jane Banning; Susan Skochelak Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2009 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.657