BACKGROUND: Lack of data for timely decision-making around the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) presents special challenges for policy makers, especially in resource-limited settings. New data collection methods, including pre-recorded Interactive Voice Response (IVR) phone surveys, are being developed to support rapid compilation of population-level disease risk factor information in such settings. We aimed to identify information that could be used to optimize consent approaches for future mobile phone surveys (MPS) employed in Uganda and, possibly, similar contexts. METHODS: We conducted an in-depth qualitative study with key stakeholders in Uganda about consent approaches, and potential challenges, for pre-recorded IVR NCD risk factor surveys. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 key informants. A contextualized thematic approach was used to interpret the results supported by representative quotes. RESULTS: Several potential challenges in designing consent approaches for MPS were identified, including low literacy and the lack of appropriate ways of assessing comprehension and documenting consent. Communication with potential respondents prior to the MPS and providing options for callbacks were suggested as possible strategies for improving comprehension within the consent process. "Opt-in" forms of authorization were preferred over "opt-out". There was particular concern about data security and confidentiality and how matters relating to this would be communicated to MPS respondents. CONCLUSIONS: These local insights provide important information to support optimization of consent for MPS, whose use is increasing globally to advance public health surveillance and research in constructive ways.
BACKGROUND: Lack of data for timely decision-making around the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) presents special challenges for policy makers, especially in resource-limited settings. New data collection methods, including pre-recorded Interactive Voice Response (IVR) phone surveys, are being developed to support rapid compilation of population-level disease risk factor information in such settings. We aimed to identify information that could be used to optimize consent approaches for future mobile phone surveys (MPS) employed in Uganda and, possibly, similar contexts. METHODS: We conducted an in-depth qualitative study with key stakeholders in Uganda about consent approaches, and potential challenges, for pre-recorded IVR NCD risk factor surveys. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 key informants. A contextualized thematic approach was used to interpret the results supported by representative quotes. RESULTS: Several potential challenges in designing consent approaches for MPS were identified, including low literacy and the lack of appropriate ways of assessing comprehension and documenting consent. Communication with potential respondents prior to the MPS and providing options for callbacks were suggested as possible strategies for improving comprehension within the consent process. "Opt-in" forms of authorization were preferred over "opt-out". There was particular concern about data security and confidentiality and how matters relating to this would be communicated to MPS respondents. CONCLUSIONS: These local insights provide important information to support optimization of consent for MPS, whose use is increasing globally to advance public health surveillance and research in constructive ways.
Entities:
Keywords:
Mobile phone surveys (MPS); Uganda; consent; mHealth; public health surveillance
Authors: Barbara L Filkins; Ju Young Kim; Bruce Roberts; Winston Armstrong; Mark A Miller; Michael L Hultner; Anthony P Castillo; Jean-Christophe Ducom; Eric J Topol; Steven R Steinhubl Journal: Am J Transl Res Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 4.060
Authors: Luswa Lukwago; Miriam Nanyunja; Nestor Ndayimirije; Joseph Wamala; Mugaga Malimbo; William Mbabazi; Anne Gasasira; Immaculate N Nabukenya; Monica Musenero; Wondimagegnehu Alemu; Helen Perry; Peter Nsubuga; Ambrose Talisuna Journal: Health Policy Plan Date: 2012-06-04 Impact factor: 3.344
Authors: Zana C Somda; Helen N Perry; Nancy R Messonnier; Mamadou H Djingarey; Salimata Ouedraogo Ki; Martin I Meltzer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-09-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Bette Liu; Julia M L Brotherton; David Shellard; Basil Donovan; Marion Saville; John M Kaldor Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2011-11-24 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Juliet Nabbuye Sekandi; Kenya Murray; Corinne Berryman; Paula Davis-Olwell; Caroline Hurst; Robert Kakaire; Noah Kiwanuka; Christopher C Whalen; Erisa Sabakaki Mwaka Journal: Interact J Med Res Date: 2022-06-02
Authors: Angelica Torres-Quintero; Angela Vega; Dustin G Gibson; Mariana Rodriguez-Patarroyo; Stephanie Puerto; George W Pariyo; Joseph Ali; Adnan A Hyder; Alain Labrique; Hannah Selig; Rolando Enrique Peñaloza; Andres I Vecino-Ortiz Journal: Glob Health Action Date: 2020-12-31 Impact factor: 2.640