Tierney E Wolgemuth1, Maris Cuddeback2, Lisa S Callegari3, Keri L Rodriguez4, Xinhua Zhao5, Sonya Borrero6. 1. University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: tew45@pitt.edu. 2. University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3. Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Center for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington. 4. University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Health Care System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 5. Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Health Care System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 6. University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Health Care System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Center for Research on Health Care, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although many studies evaluate factors influencing contraceptive use, little is known about barriers and facilitators that may be specific to or prevalent among women veterans using the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (VA). DESIGN: Semistructured telephone interviews with a national sample of 189 women veterans at risk for unintended pregnancy who receive care in the VA were used to explore barriers and facilitators to contraceptive use as well as elicit suggestions for improving VA contraceptive care. The sample consisted primarily of women with risk factors for adverse reproductive health outcomes, including belonging to ethnic/racial minority groups, having a medical or mental health condition(s), and/or reporting a history of military sexual trauma. Transcript narratives were analyzed using content analysis and the constant comparison method. RESULTS: Five distinct themes emerged as barriers or facilitators to contraceptive use depending on participants' VA facility and provider, and women offered concrete suggestions to address each barrier. Most participants (56%) noted poor efficiency as a barrier; others (39%) felt hindered by limited contraceptive counseling and patient education. Approximately one-third (34%) noted that low patient awareness of services impeded care and another one-third (32%) stressed poor interaction with providers as a barrier. Finally, 31% noted feeling ostracized at VA, and emphasized fostering a woman-friendly environment to remove discomfort associated with seeking contraceptive care. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that, despite widespread access to low-cost contraception, many women veterans experience barriers to accessing high-quality contraceptive care. These barriers are system and provider specific and warrant further internal evaluation.
BACKGROUND: Although many studies evaluate factors influencing contraceptive use, little is known about barriers and facilitators that may be specific to or prevalent among women veterans using the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (VA). DESIGN: Semistructured telephone interviews with a national sample of 189 women veterans at risk for unintended pregnancy who receive care in the VA were used to explore barriers and facilitators to contraceptive use as well as elicit suggestions for improving VA contraceptive care. The sample consisted primarily of women with risk factors for adverse reproductive health outcomes, including belonging to ethnic/racial minority groups, having a medical or mental health condition(s), and/or reporting a history of military sexual trauma. Transcript narratives were analyzed using content analysis and the constant comparison method. RESULTS: Five distinct themes emerged as barriers or facilitators to contraceptive use depending on participants' VA facility and provider, and women offered concrete suggestions to address each barrier. Most participants (56%) noted poor efficiency as a barrier; others (39%) felt hindered by limited contraceptive counseling and patient education. Approximately one-third (34%) noted that low patient awareness of services impeded care and another one-third (32%) stressed poor interaction with providers as a barrier. Finally, 31% noted feeling ostracized at VA, and emphasized fostering a woman-friendly environment to remove discomfort associated with seeking contraceptive care. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that, despite widespread access to low-cost contraception, many women veterans experience barriers to accessing high-quality contraceptive care. These barriers are system and provider specific and warrant further internal evaluation.
Authors: Lindsey L Monteith; Nazanin H Bahraini; Holly R Gerber; Brooke Dorsey Holliman; Alexandra L Schneider; Ryan Holliday; Bridget B Matarazzo Journal: Psychol Serv Date: 2018-09-27
Authors: Crystal P Tyler; Maura K Whiteman; Lauren B Zapata; Kathryn M Curtis; Susan D Hillis; Polly A Marchbanks Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Sonya Borrero; Cara Nikolajski; Julia R Steinberg; Lori Freedman; Aletha Y Akers; Said Ibrahim; Eleanor Bimla Schwarz Journal: Contraception Date: 2014-10-22 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Sonya Borrero; Lisa S Callegari; Xinhua Zhao; Maria K Mor; Florentina E Sileanu; Galen Switzer; Susan Zickmund; Donna L Washington; Laurie C Zephyrin; E Bimla Schwarz Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-04-21 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jodie Katon; Gayle Reiber; Danielle Rose; Bevanne Bean-Mayberry; Laurie Zephyrin; Donna L Washington; Elizabeth M Yano Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Colleen P Judge-Golden; Sonya Borrero; Xinhua Zhao; Maria K Mor; Lisa S Callegari Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Lisa S Callegari; Siobhan S Mahorter; Sam K Benson; Xinhua Zhao; Eleanor Bimla Schwarz; Sonya Borrero Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-08-30 Impact factor: 6.473