| Literature DB >> 31557923 |
Juan Xie1,2, Yueming Yang3, Songtao Lv4,5, Yongning Zhang6, Xuan Zhu7, Cece Zheng8.
Abstract
Acrylamide with a double bond and amide group can not only copolymerize with macromolecules of crumb rubber but also react with acidic groups in asphalt, so it was selected as a modifier to activate crumb rubber through chemical graft action. The purpose is to improve the compatibility between crumb rubber and asphalt and thus improve the rheological properties and storage stability of rubber asphalt. Infrared spectroscopy (IR) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used to characterize the crumb rubbers and their modified asphalt. It was found that the crumb rubber of grafting acrylamide had better compatibility in asphalt due to its larger specific surface area and chemical reaction with asphalt. In addition, the high temperature rheological test, low temperature creep test, and polymer separation test were carried out to study the effect of grafted activated crumb rubber on the properties of modified asphalt. The results showed that compared with modified asphalt with common crumb rubber (CRMA), the rheological properties and storage stability of modified asphalt with grafting activated crumb rubber (A-G-R) were improved significantly. The results of microscopic and macroscopic tests show that the activated rubber particles have a larger contact area with asphalt due to a rougher surface and the chemical cross-linking between rubber particles and asphalt further strengthens their interaction. Therefore, there is a relatively stable blend system formed in modified asphalt, and its performance of modified asphalt has been improved.Entities:
Keywords: acrylamide; chemical cross-linking; chemical grafting; compatibility; modified asphalt; rheology; storage stability
Year: 2019 PMID: 31557923 PMCID: PMC6835636 DOI: 10.3390/polym11101563
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Properties of base asphalt binder.
| Item | Units | Test Results | Standard |
|---|---|---|---|
| Penetration (25 °C, 100 g, 5 s) | 0.1 mm | 64.0 | JTG-T0604-2011 |
| Softening temperature | °C | 48.1 | JTG-T0606-2011 |
| Ductility (15 °C, 5 cm/min) | cm | >100 | JTG-T0605-2011 |
| Kinematic viscosity (135 °C) | mPa s | 158.5 | JTG-T0625-2011 |
| Density | g/cm3 | 1.034 | JTG-T0603-2011 |
| RTFO treated at 163 °C for 85 min | |||
| Quality change | % | −0.061 | JTG-T0610-1-2011 |
| Residual penetration ratio (25 °C) | % | 80.0 | JTG-T0610-2-2011 |
| Residual ductility (5 °C) | cm | 7.0 | JTG-T0605-2011 |
Properties of crumb rubber.
| Item | Result | Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Water content (%) | 0.96 | HG/TXXX-2001 7.2.2 |
| Ash content (%) | 9.3 | GB4498 |
| Acetone extract content (%) | 13.6 | GB/T3516 |
| Density (g/cm3) | 1.05 | GB/T533 |
| Tensile strength (MPa) | 6.4 | GB/T528 |
| Elongation at break (%) | 855 | GB/T52 |
Figure 1Infrared absorption spectrums of crumb rubber (CR) and activated crumb rubber (AM–CR).
Figure 2Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of CR and AM–CR. (a) The image of CR (200×); (b) The image of AM–CR (200×); (c) The image of CR (500×); (d) The image of AM–CR (500×).
Figure 3Infrared absorption spectrums of CRMA and A–G–R.
Figure 4The reaction between activated rubber and asphalt.
Figure 5The 175 °C viscosity of CRMA and A–G–R.
Figure 6The complex modulus (G*) of CRMA and A–G–R.
Figure 7The phase angle (δ) of CRMA and A–G–R.
Figure 8The rutting factor (G*/sinδ) of CRMA and A–G–R.
Creep stiffness modulus S and creep rate m value of CRMA and A–G–R.
| Simple | −12 °C | −18 °C | −24 °C | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| CRMA with 10% CR | 115.0 | 0.368 | 231.3 | 0.324 | 457.7 | 0.275 |
| CRMA with 15% CR | 82.3 | 0.389 | 182.3 | 0.333 | 386.0 | 0.282 |
| CRMA with 20% CR | 75.6 | 0.396 | 159.7 | 0.350 | 297.3 | 0.296 |
| CRMA with 25% CR | 45.2 | 0.398 | 70.4 | 0.357 | 196.0 | 0.308 |
| A–G–R with 10% AM–CR | 104.0 | 0.371 | 219.7 | 0.329 | 411.0 | 0.282 |
| A–G–R with 15% AM–CR | 72.5 | 0.383 | 178.3 | 0.341 | 344.3 | 0.295 |
| A–G–R with 20% AM–CR | 67.3 | 0.413 | 147.7 | 0.359 | 240.0 | 0.307 |
| A–G–R with 25% AM–CR | 33.5 | 0.422 | 63.4 | 0.368 | 143.3 | 0.309 |
Figure 9SEM images of CRMA and A–G–R. (a) The image of CRMA (200×); (b) The image of A–G–R (200×); (c) The image of CRMA (500×); (d) The image of A–G–R (500×).
Figure 10The softening point and softening point difference of CRMA and A–G–R.
Figure 11The rutting factor-temperature curves of CRMA and A–G–R.
Figure 12The separation index (SI) curves of CRMA and A–G–R.
Figure 13A–G–R and CRMA stored 72 h at 163 °C. (a) The image of CRMA; (b) the image of A–G–R.