| Literature DB >> 31557820 |
Xiang Li1, Rui Li2, Chunge Ju3, Bo Hou4, Qi Wei5, Bin Zhou6, Zhiyong Chen7, Rong Zhang8.
Abstract
Micromachined gyroscopes require high voltage (HV) for actuation and detection to improve its precision, but the deviation of the HV caused by temperature fluctuations will degrade the sensor's performance. In this paper, a high-voltage temperature-insensitive charge pump is proposed. Without adopting BCD (bipolar-CMOS-DMOS) technology, the output voltage can be boosted over the breakdown voltage of n-well/substrate diode using triple-well NMOS (n-type metal-oxide-semiconductor) transistors. By controlling the pumping clock's amplitude continuously, closed-loop regulation is realized to reduce the output voltage's sensitivity to temperature changes. Besides, the output level is programmable linearly in a large range by changing the reference voltage. The whole circuit has been fabricated in a 0.18- μ m standard CMOS (complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor) process with a total area of 2.53 mm 2 . Measurements indicate that its output voltage has a linear adjustable range from around 13 V to 16.95 V, and temperature tests show that the maximum variations of the output voltage at - 40 ∼ 80 ∘ C are less than 1.1%.Entities:
Keywords: high-voltage generation; regulated charge pump; standard CMOS process; temperature-insensitive; triple-well NMOS transistor
Year: 2019 PMID: 31557820 PMCID: PMC6807267 DOI: 10.3390/s19194149
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Block diagram of the proposed charge pump.
Figure 2Diode structure built with deep n-well for the Dickson charge pump II [27].
Figure 3Clocks generation for the two sub-charge pumps: (a) clocks for the Dickson charge pump I; and (b) clocks for the Dickson charge pump II.
Figure 4Linear small-signal model of the proposed charge pump.
Figure 5Block diagram of the closed-loop model. (a) P-controller, (b) linearized charge pump small-signal mode.
Figure 6Micro-photograph of the charge pump.
Figure 7Experimental setup for testing the charge pump.
Figure 8Measured output of the charge pump at 20 : (a) the tested graph of output vs. reference voltage; (b) the tested controller voltage vs. reference; and (c) regression of the linear interval in (a).
Figure 9Measured output of the charge pump under different temperature conditions: (a) the tested graph of output vs. reference voltage in the linear interval; and (b) the maximum variation of the output voltage from to .
Performance comparison with previous researches.
| Parameter | This Work | [ | [ | [ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Process | 0.18- | 0.13- | 0.35- | 0.18- |
| Supply Voltage | 5 V | 1.8 V | 3.6 V | 1.2 V |
| Maximum Output | 16.95 V | 22 V | 10.4 V | 14.8 V |
| Stage Capacitor | 72 pF | N/A | 1.6–1.1 pF | 5.4 pF |
| Closed-loop Approach | Clock Amplitude | Digital Control | Clock Frequency | Open-loop |
| Temperature Variation | 1.1% ( | N/A | N/A | 10% ( |
| Area | 2.52 mm | 0.149 mm | 0.14 mm | N/A |